The drug concentrations targeted in meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam therapy also depend on the susceptibility of the pathogen. Yet, the pathogen is often unknown, and antibiotic therapy is guided by empirical targets. To reliably achieve the targeted concentrations, dosing needs to be adjusted for renal function. We aimed to evaluate a meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam monitoring program in intensive care unit (ICU) patients by assessing (i) the adequacy of locally selected empirical targets, (ii) if dosing is adequately adjusted for renal function and individual target, and (iii) if dosing is adjusted in target attainment (TA) failure. In a prospective, observational clinical trial of drug concentrations, relevant patient characteristics and microbiological data (pathogen, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)) for patients receiving meropenem or piperacillin/tazobactam treatment were collected. If the MIC value was available, a target range of 1–5 × MIC was selected for minimum drug concentrations of both drugs. If the MIC value was not available, 8–40 mg/L and 16–80 mg/L were selected as empirical target ranges for meropenem and piperacillin, respectively. A total of 356 meropenem and 216 piperacillin samples were collected from 108 and 96 ICU patients, respectively. The vast majority of observed MIC values was lower than the empirical target (meropenem: 90.0%, piperacillin: 93.9%), suggesting empirical target value reductions. TA was found to be low (meropenem: 35.7%, piperacillin 50.5%) with the lowest TA for severely impaired renal function (meropenem: 13.9%, piperacillin: 29.2%), and observed drug concentrations did not significantly differ between patients with different targets, indicating dosing was not adequately adjusted for renal function or target. Dosing adjustments were rare for both drugs (meropenem: 6.13%, piperacillin: 4.78%) and for meropenem irrespective of TA, revealing that concentration monitoring alone was insufficient to guide dosing adjustment. Empirical targets should regularly be assessed and adjusted based on local susceptibility data. To improve TA, scientific knowledge should be translated into easy-to-use dosing strategies guiding antibiotic dosing.

The prevalence and mortality rates of severe infections are high in intensive care units (ICUs). At the same time, the high pharmacokinetic variability observed in ICU patients increases the risk of inadequate antibiotic drug exposure. Therefore, dosing tailored to specific patient characteristics has a high potential to improve outcomes in this vulnerable patient population. This study aimed to develop a tabular dosing decision tool for initial therapy of meropenem integrating hospital-specific, thus far unexploited pathogen susceptibility information. An appropriate meropenem pharmacokinetic model was selected from the literature and evaluated using clinical data. Probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis was conducted for clinically interesting dosing regimens. To inform dosing prior to pathogen identification, the local pathogen-independent mean fraction of response (LPIFR) was calculated based on the observed minimum inhibitory concentrations distribution in the hospital. A simple, tabular, model-informed dosing decision tool was developed for initial meropenem therapy. Dosing recommendations achieving PTA > 90% or LPIFR > 90% for patients with different creatinine clearances were integrated. Based on the experiences during the development process, a generalised workflow for the development of tabular dosing decision tools was derived. The proposed workflow can support the development of model-informed dosing tools for initial therapy of various drugs and hospital-specific conditions.

Introduction: The World Health Organization has declared carbapenem-resistant organisms a research and development priority. Although ceftazidime–avibactam was approved around a decade ago, there is still a lack of prospective data on the treatment of resistant pathogens with this agent. Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational, single-center, investigator-initiated study of patients treated with ceftazidime–avibactam for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms. The primary outcome was clinical cure 14 days after the initiation of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Secondary outcomes, which were assessed on day 30, included microbiological failure, development of resistance, all-cause mortality, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results: A total of 50 patients were included in the study. At baseline, the median Charlson Comorbidity Index and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score were 5.5 and 7. Approximately three-quarters of the patients were treated in an intensive care unit and had undergone mechanical ventilation within the previous 7 days prior to the commencement of ceftazidime–avibactam treatment. Half of the patients were diagnosed with nosocomial pneumonia. Most infections were caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (48%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (28%). Clinical cure at day 14 was achieved in 59% of patients. Four deaths (9%) and two cases of microbiological failure (4%) were observed. The median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 14 days. There was no emergence of resistance to ceftazidime–avibactam. Discussion: Our study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of ceftazidime–avibactam in treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms. In this cohort of critically ill patients, our results in terms of both clinical success and survival are in the upper range compared to those from mainly retrospective and some prospective studies. Although the benefits of ceftazidime–avibactam have been demonstrated in this and other studies, it must be prescribed cautiously to ensure it remains effective.