Constantine Sedikides

Prof. Constantine Sedikides


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2006 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TWTim Wildschut
Tim Wildschut
CSConstantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides
JAJamie Arndt
Jamie Arndt
CRClay Routledge
Clay Routledge
Seven methodologically diverse studies addressed 3 fundamental questions about nostalgia. Studies 1 and 2 examined the content of nostalgic experiences. Descriptions of nostalgic experiences typically featured the self as a protagonist in interactions with close others (e.g., friends) or in momentous events (e.g., weddings). Also, the descriptions contained more expressions of positive than negative affect and often depicted the redemption of negative life scenes by subsequent triumphs. Studies 3 and 4 examined triggers of nostalgia and revealed that nostalgia occurs in response to negative mood and the discrete affective state of loneliness. Studies 5, 6, and 7 investigated the functional utility of nostalgia and established that nostalgia bolsters social bonds, increases positive self-regard, and generates positive affect. These findings demarcate key landmarks in the hitherto uncharted research domain of nostalgia.

11 February 2009 in European Review of Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMark D. Alicke
Mark D. Alicke
CSConstantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides
We define self-enhancement and self-protection as interests that individuals have in advancing one or more self-domains or defending against negative self-views. We review ways in which people pursue self-enhancement and self-protection, discuss the role of these motivational constructs in scientific explanations, argue for their importance in maintaining psychological and physical well-being, and consider the conditions in which they are likely to operate. At various points, we address the perennial “cognition–motivation” debate. We argue that, despite the conceptual and practical difficulties that attend this distinction, the pervasiveness of the self-enhancement and self-protection motives makes it impossible and imprudent to ignore them in explaining self-related findings and theories.


1 March 2008 in Perspectives on Psychological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSConstantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides
AGAiden P. Gregg
Aiden P. Gregg

1 March 2002 in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WCW. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell
EREric A. Rudich
Eric A. Rudich
CSConstantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides
The authors hypothesized that both narcissism and high self-esteem are associated with positive self-views but each is associated with positivity in different domains of the self. Narcissists perceive themselves as better than average on traits reflecting an agentic orientation (e.g., intellectual skills, extraversion) but not on those reflecting a communal orientation (e.g., agreeableness, morality). In contrast, high-self-esteem individuals perceive themselves as better than average both on agentic and communal traits. Three studies confirmed the hypothesis. In Study 1, narcissists rated themselves as extraverted and open to experience but not as more agreeable or emotionally stable. High-self-esteem individuals rated themselves highly on all of these traits except openness. In Study 2, narcissists (but not high-self-esteem individuals) rated themselves as better than their romantic partners. In Study 3, narcissists rated themselves as more intelligent, but not more moral, than the average person. In contrast, high-self-esteem individuals viewed themselves as more moral and more intelligent.

1 September 2004 in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSConstantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides
EREric A. Rudich
Eric A. Rudich
AGAiden P. Gregg
Aiden P. Gregg
MKMadoka Kumashiro
Madoka Kumashiro
CRCaryl Rusbult
Caryl Rusbult
Five studies established that normal narcissism is correlated with good psychological health. Specifically, narcissism is (a) inversely related to daily sadness and dispositional depression, (b) inversely related to daily and dispositional loneliness, (c) positively related to daily and dispositional subjective well-being as well as couple well-being, (d) inversely related to daily anxiety, and (e) inversely related to dispositional neuroticism. More important, self-esteem fully accounted for the relation between narcissism and psychological health. Thus, narcissism is beneficial for psychological health only insofar as it is associated with high self-esteem. Explanations of the main and mediational findings in terms of response or social desirability biases (e.g., defensiveness, repression, impression management) were ruled out. Supplementary analysis showed that the links among narcissism, self-esteem, and psychological health were preponderantly linear.