Robert W. Holloway

Prof. Dr. Robert W. Holloway

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2017 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRobert W. Holloway
Robert W. Holloway
NANadeem R. Abu-Rustum
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
FBFloor J. Backes
Floor J. Backes
JBJohn F. Boggess
John F. Boggess
WGWalter H. Gotlieb
Walter H. Gotlieb
RWRebecca J. Wolsky
Rebecca J. Wolsky

1 July 2012 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRobert W. Holloway
Robert W. Holloway
RBRicardo A. Molero Bravo
Ricardo A. Molero Bravo
JRJoseph A. Rakowski
Joseph A. Rakowski
JJJeffrey A. James
Jeffrey A. James
CJCorinne N. Jeppson
Corinne N. Jeppson
SASarfraz Ahmad
Sarfraz Ahmad

1 December 2009 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRobert W. Holloway
Robert W. Holloway
SASarfraz Ahmad
Sarfraz Ahmad
SDSara A. DeNardis
Sara A. DeNardis
LPLorna B. Peterson
Lorna B. Peterson
NSNazia Sultana
Nazia Sultana
NFNeil J. Finkler
Neil J. Finkler

1 May 2016 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRobert W. Holloway
Robert W. Holloway
SGSarika Gupta
Sarika Gupta
NSNicole M. Stavitzski
Nicole M. Stavitzski
XZXiang Zhu
Xiang Zhu
ETErica L. Takimoto
Erica L. Takimoto
Sarfraz AhmadSarfraz Ahmad
Sarfraz Ahmad

1 June 2009 in Scandinavian Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRobert W. Holloway
Robert W. Holloway
SPS. D. Patel
S. D. Patel
SAS. Ahmad
S. Ahmad
Advanced laparoscopic procedures for gynecologic surgery have not been widely adopted in clinical practice despite nearly 20 years of improvements in laparoscopic technology. The da Vinci® robotic surgical system was cleared for use in gynecologic surgery in the U.S in 2005. Many surgeons have embraced da Vinci® technology over conventional laparoscopy because of its technologic advantages of wristed instrumentation, high definition 3-D optics, ergonomics, and autonomy of camera control. Furthermore, many surgeons with limited advanced laparoscopic skills have successfully converted their practice from primarily laparotomy to minimally invasive surgery using the da Vinci® System. The purpose of this article is to review the development of robotic procedures in gynecology through the current literature. This article reviews recent peer-reviewed literature concerning robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures including hysterectomy, myomectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy, trachelectomy, parametrectomy, tubal anastamosis, sacrocolpopexy, and others. The majority of this literature consists of descriptive retrospective case series from the investigator's early experience; in fact these early reports represent innovation of a new operative technique. Some reports compare outcomes to open and standard laparoscopic procedures. Future prospective studies comparing complications, pain, return to routine activity, and long-term clinical outcomes with open and laparoscopic procedures will be necessary to completely appreciate the impact of robotic technology.

1 September 2025 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSusana Banerjee
Susana Banerjee
ENEls Van Nieuwenhuysen
Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
CACarol Aghajanian
Carol Aghajanian
VDVéronique D’Hondt
Véronique D’Hondt
BMBradley J. Monk
Bradley J. Monk
RGRachel N. Grisham
Rachel N. Grisham
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of avutometinib (rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma/mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase [MEK] clamp) alone or in combination with defactinib (focal adhesion kinase inhibitor) in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC). METHODS: In this phase II, open-label study, patients with recurrent, measurable LGSOC after ≥1 line of platinum chemotherapy were stratified by tumor Kirsten rat sarcoma virus homolog ( KRAS ) mutation status and randomly assigned to oral avutometinib 4.0 mg two times per week monotherapy or avutometinib 3.2 mg two times per week in combination with oral defactinib 200 mg two times per day. The combination was selected as the go-forward regimen for expansion. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients received the go-forward combination regimen. Patients had a median of 3 (range, 1-9) prior lines of therapy, including hormonal (86%), bevacizumab (51%), and MEK inhibitor (22%). Confirmed ORR was 31% (95% CI, 23% to 41%) with a median duration of response of 31.1 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 31.1). ORR was 44% in KRAS- mutant and 17% in KRAS wild-type cohorts. The median progression-free survival was 12.9 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 20.2) overall and 22.0 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 36.6) and 12.8 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 18.4) in KRAS- mutant and wild-type cohorts, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were elevated creatine phosphokinase (24%), diarrhea (8%), and anemia (5%). Ten percent of patients discontinued because of AEs. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety profile of avutometinib in combination with defactinib support this combination as a potential standard of care for recurrent LGSOC. A randomized phase 3 study of avutometinib and defactinib versus investigator's choice of therapy for women with recurrent LGSOC is currently enrolling (RAMP301; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06072781 ).