Eugene van Rensburg

Prof. Eugene van Rensburg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2015 in Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RDRiaan DenHaan
Riaan DenHaan
EREugene van Rensburg
Eugene van Rensburg
SRShaunita H Rose
Shaunita H Rose
JGJohann Gorgens
Johann Gorgens
WZWillem Heber van Zyl
Willem Heber van Zyl

1 September 2016 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LGLalitha Devi Gottumukkala
Lalitha Devi Gottumukkala
KHKate Haigh
Kate Haigh
FCFrançois-Xavier Collard
François-Xavier Collard
EREugene van Rensburg
Eugene van Rensburg
JGJohann Gorgens
Johann Gorgens

5 September 2017 in Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMohsen Ali Mandegari
Mohsen Ali Mandegari
SFSomayeh Farzad
Somayeh Farzad
EREugene van Rensburg
Eugene van Rensburg
JGJohann Gorgens
Johann Gorgens

29 November 2013 in Biotechnology for Biofuels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lorenzo FavaroLorenzo Favaro
Lorenzo Favaro
MBMarina Basaglia
Marina Basaglia
ATAlberto Trento
Alberto Trento
EREugene van Rensburg
Eugene van Rensburg
MGMaria García-Aparicio
Maria García-Aparicio
SCSergio Casella
Sergio Casella
Background: Robust yeasts with high inhibitor, temperature, and osmotic tolerance remain a crucial requirement for the sustainable production of lignocellulosic bioethanol. These stress factors are known to severely hinder culture growth and fermentation performance. Results: Grape marc was selected as an extreme environment to search for innately robust yeasts because of its limited nutrients, exposure to solar radiation, temperature fluctuations, weak acid and ethanol content. Forty newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains gave high ethanol yields at 40°C when inoculated in minimal media at high sugar concentrations of up to 200 g/l glucose. In addition, the isolates displayed distinct inhibitor tolerance in defined broth supplemented with increasing levels of single inhibitors or with a cocktail containing several inhibitory compounds. Both the fermentation ability and inhibitor resistance of these strains were greater than those of established industrial and commercial S. cerevisiae yeasts used as control strains in this study. Liquor from steam-pretreated sugarcane bagasse was used as a key selective condition during the isolation of robust yeasts for industrial ethanol production, thus simulating the industrial environment. The isolate Fm17 produced the highest ethanol concentration (43.4 g/l) from the hydrolysate, despite relatively high concentrations of weak acids, furans, and phenolics. This strain also exhibited a significantly greater conversion rate of inhibitory furaldehydes compared with the reference strain S. cerevisiae 27P. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing a strain of S. cerevisiae able to produce an ethanol yield equal to 89% of theoretical maximum yield in the presence of high concentrations of inhibitors from sugarcane bagasse. Conclusions: This study showed that yeasts with high tolerance to multiple stress factors can be obtained from unconventional ecological niches. Grape marc appeared to be an unexplored and promising substrate for the isolation of S. cerevisiae strains showing enhanced inhibitor, temperature, and osmotic tolerance compared with established industrial strains. This integrated approach of selecting multiple resistant yeasts from a single source demonstrates the potential of obtaining yeasts that are able to withstand a number of fermentation-related stresses. The yeast strains isolated and selected in this study represent strong candidates for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates.

13 April 2012 in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EREugene van Rensburg
Eugene van Rensburg
RDRiaan DenHaan
Riaan DenHaan
JSJustin Smith
Justin Smith
WZWillem Heber van Zyl
Willem Heber van Zyl
JGJohann Gorgens
Johann Gorgens

15 May 2014 in BMC Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJustin Smith
Justin Smith
EREugene van Rensburg
Eugene van Rensburg
JGJohann Gorgens
Johann Gorgens
Yeasts tolerant to toxic inhibitors from steam-pretreated lignocellulose with xylose co-fermentation capability represent an appealing approach for 2nd generation ethanol production. Whereas rational engineering, mutagenesis and evolutionary engineering are established techniques for either improved xylose utilisation or enhancing yeast tolerance, this report focuses on the simultaneous enhancement of these attributes through mutagenesis and evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase in anoxic chemostat culture using non-detoxified pretreatment liquor from triticale straw.