Bone mineral density (BMD) is an essential indicator of bone strength and plays a crucial role in the clinical management of various spinal pathologies. Hounsfield units (HUs) calculated from computed tomography (CT) scans are a well-established, effective, and non-invasive method to determine bone density in the lumbar spine when juxtaposed to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, the gold standard for assessing trabecular bone density. Only recently have studies begun to investigate and establish HUs as a reliable and valid alternative for bone quality assessment in the cervical spine as well. In addition, multiple recent studies have identified cervical HUs as an accurate predictor of cage subsidence, an undesired complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) procedures. Subsidence involves migration of the spinal fusion cage into vertebral bodies, causing a loss of disk space, negatively altering spine alignment, and possibly necessitating further unwanted surgical intervention. Using the PRISMA-ScR checklist and the registered scoping review protocol (INPLASY2024100126), this review explores the current research on the use of cervical spine HU measurements as both a determinant of BMD and as a prognosticator of postoperative subsidence following cervical spine procedures (i.e., ACDFs and ACCFs) with the aim of improving clinical and surgical outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Failure to rescue (FTR), defined as the occurrence of a major complication plus death within 30 days, is a key measure of surgical safety. Hypoalbuminemia is a known risk factor for poor outcome in metastatic spinal tumor surgery, yet its association with FTR has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to evaluate serum albumin level as predictor of FTR after surgery for spinal metastases. Methods: A total of 1749 patients with disseminated cancer who underwent oncologic surgery for spinal metastases (identified by CPT codes) and met our inclusion criteria were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database (2018–2023). The primary endpoint was FTR, defined as a major complication plus death occurring within 30 days of surgery. Serum albumin was analyzed both as a continuous and categorical variable (hypoalbuminemia < 3.5 g/dL, normal albumin > 3.5 g/dL). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for demographic and operative variables. Results: The mean preoperative serum albumin level was 3.63 g/dL (standard deviation = 0.642) and the FTR rate was 4% (71 of 1749). After adjusting for potential confounders such as modified Frailty Index 5, ASA class, functional status, emergent case, and reoperation, higher preoperative albumin levels (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.26–0.61]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with decreased odds of FTR. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest an association between preoperative serum albumin level and FTR in oncologic surgery for spinal metastases. This highlights the importance of albumin assessment for perioperative prognosis, but the findings require further validation.

Background/Objectives: Metastatic spine disease (MSD) affects a significant proportion of patients with advanced malignancies and often necessitates surgical intervention to preserve neurological function, alleviate pain, and maintain spinal stability. While oncologic spine surgery is ideally performed in a planned, semi-elective setting, a substantial number of patients require unplanned (urgent or emergent) surgery due to acute deterioration. The impact of surgical planning status on postoperative outcomes following metastatic spine tumor surgery remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the patient characteristics and short-term outcomes of those undergoing planned versus unplanned surgery for spinal metastases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2018 to 2023. Patients with disseminated cancer undergoing tumor surgery were identified. Case types were grouped into planned (elective) and unplanned (urgent or emergent). The primary endpoint was failure to rescue (FTR); secondary endpoints included 30-day major complications, 30-day mortality, and length of hospital stay. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed. Results: A total of 2147 patients met our inclusion criteria, out of whom 60% (n = 1284) underwent planned and 40% (n = 863) underwent unplanned surgery. Patients in the unplanned surgery group had a significantly higher prevalence of severe hypoalbuminemia, severe anemia, and ASA class IV status (p ≤ 0.001 for all). For our primary endpoint, a multivariable analysis showed a significant association between unplanned surgery and FTR (OR 2.11 [95% CI 1.24 to 3.56]; p = 0.005). Significant associations were also found with 30-day mortality (OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.25 to 2.72]; p = 0.002) and length of hospital stay (β 2.7 [95% CI 1.97 to 3.43]; p < 0.001). However, unplanned surgery could not independently predict 30-day major complications (OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.97 to 1.51]; p = 0.08). Conclusions: Our study found that unplanned surgery for spinal metastases was associated with significantly higher rates of FTR, 30-day mortality, and extended hospital stay, independent of other covariates. These findings highlight the importance of the timely identification of patients requiring surgery and the potential benefits of semi-elective care.

BACKGROUND: Scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome is one of the most challenging spinal deformities to manage. Multiple surgical approaches have been developed, including traditional staged and concomitant procedures, spine-shortening osteotomies, and individual vertebral column resections. OBSERVATIONS: A 10-year-old female presented with congenital kyphoscoliosis with worsening curve progression, tethered spinal cord, and a history of enuresis. The scoliosis had progressed to a 26° coronal curve and 55° thoracolumbar kyphosis. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the spine revealed a tethered cord between the levels of L3–4 and a large kyphotic deformity at L1. The patient underwent laminectomy, during which intraoperative motor signals were lost. A planned hemivertebrectomy at L1 was performed prior to an L4 laminectomy, untethering of the filum terminale, and posterior spinal fusion from T11 to L2. After surgery, the patient experienced transient lower-extremity weakness, with her neurological function improving from baseline over the next 2 months. Ultimately, the goal of this surgery was to halt the progressive decline in motor function, which was successfully achieved. LESSONS: Much remains to be learned about the treatment of this complicated disease, especially in the setting of concomitant scoliosis. This case serves to exemplify the complex treatment paradigms that exist when attempting to manage this clinical syndrome and that more remains to be learned.

Background: Performance status is often cited as an independent predictor of survival after metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS), but its standalone predictive value for short-term outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate how well Karnofsky (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) predict 90-day survival, a common surgical candidacy threshold, in patients managed with MSTS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 175 adult patients who underwent MSTS at a single institution (2012–2025). All patients had documented preoperative KPS and ECOG-PS scores. Univariable logistic regression was used to assess associations with 90-day survival. Predictive performance was assessed by discrimination (AUC), diagnostic accuracy, calibration (Brier score), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Results: The crude 90-day survival rate was 73%. Both KPS (OR 1.02 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.05]; p = 0.001) and ECOG-PS (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.36 to 0.73]; p < 0.001) were statistically associated with survival. However, discrimination was modest (AUC 0.65 for KPS, 0.68 for ECOG-PS), with the most balanced diagnostic accuracy achieved at KPS ≥ 70 (sensitivity 0.66, specificity 0.62) and ECOG-PS ≤ 2 (sensitivity 0.76, specificity 0.5). Calibration was fair (Brier scores 0.185 and 0.182, respectively). Decision curve analysis showed minimal net benefit across most threshold probabilities, with ECOG-PS performing slightly better at intermediate thresholds (30–60%), the zone of greatest clinical uncertainty. Conclusions: Despite being widely cited as an independent predictor of postoperative survival in patients with metastatic spine disease, performance status assessed via the KPS and ECOG-PS demonstrated only modest overall discriminatory ability, diagnostic accuracy, calibration, and clinical utility when used alone to predict 90-day survival after MSTS. While both scores retained meaningful value at the extremes (i.e., patients with very poor or very good performance status had more predictable outcomes), caution is warranted in intermediate cases, where performance status alone may be insufficient to guide treatment decisions. These findings highlight the critical difference between statistical association and the real-world clinical utility of a single metric to predict outcome in this patient population.