Amanda K Ashley

Dr. Amanda K Ashley

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 September 2012 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShengqin Liu
Shengqin Liu
SOStephen O. Opiyo
Stephen O. Opiyo
KMKaroline Manthey
Karoline Manthey
JGJason G. Glanzer
Jason G. Glanzer
Amanda K AshleyAmanda K Ashley
Amanda K Ashley
GOGreg Oakley
Greg Oakley
DNA damage encountered by DNA replication forks poses risks of genome destabilization, a precursor to carcinogenesis. Damage checkpoint systems cause cell cycle arrest, promote repair and induce programed cell death when damage is severe. Checkpoints are critical parts of the DNA damage response network that act to suppress cancer. DNA damage and perturbation of replication machinery causes replication stress, characterized by accumulation of single-stranded DNA bound by replication protein A (RPA), which triggers activation of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) and phosphorylation of the RPA32, subunit of RPA, leading to Chk1 activation and arrest. DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) [a kinase related to ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATR] has well characterized roles in DNA double-strand break repair, but poorly understood roles in replication stress-induced RPA phosphorylation. We show that DNA-PKcs mutant cells fail to arrest replication following stress, and mutations in RPA32 phosphorylation sites targeted by DNA-PKcs increase the proportion of cells in mitosis, impair ATR signaling to Chk1 and confer a G2/M arrest defect. Inhibition of ATR and DNA-PK (but not ATM), mimic the defects observed in cells expressing mutant RPA32. Cells expressing mutant RPA32 or DNA-PKcs show sustained H2AX phosphorylation in response to replication stress that persists in cells entering mitosis, indicating inappropriate mitotic entry with unrepaired damage.

1 September 2014 in DNA Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Amanda K AshleyAmanda K Ashley
Amanda K Ashley
MSMeena Shrivastav
Meena Shrivastav
JNJingyi Nie
Jingyi Nie
CACourtney Amerin
Courtney Amerin
KTKyle Troksa
Kyle Troksa
JNJac A. Nickoloff
Jac A. Nickoloff

30 January 2011 in Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAChris Allen
Chris Allen
Amanda K AshleyAmanda K Ashley
Amanda K Ashley
RHRobert Hromas
Robert Hromas
JNJac A. Nickoloff
Jac A. Nickoloff
High-fidelity replication of DNA, and its accurate segregation to daughter cells, is critical for maintaining genome stability and suppressing cancer. DNA replication forks are stalled by many DNA lesions, activating checkpoint proteins that stabilize stalled forks. Stalled forks may eventually collapse, producing a broken DNA end. Fork restart is typically mediated by proteins initially identified by their roles in homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In recent years, several proteins involved in DSB repair by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) have been implicated in the replication stress response, including DNA-PKcs, Ku, DNA Ligase IV-XRCC4, Artemis, XLF and Metnase. It is currently unclear whether NHEJ proteins are involved in the replication stress response through indirect (signaling) roles, and/or direct roles involving DNA end joining. Additional complexity in the replication stress response centers around RPA, which undergoes significant post-translational modification after stress, and RAD52, a conserved HR protein whose role in DSB repair may have shifted to another protein in higher eukaryotes, such as BRCA2, but retained its role in fork restart. Most cancer therapeutic strategies create DNA replication stress. Thus, it is imperative to gain a better understanding of replication stress response proteins and pathways to improve cancer therapy.


1 January 2011 in Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMarie E. Legare
Marie E. Legare
JBJamie Bush
Jamie Bush
Amanda K AshleyAmanda K Ashley
Amanda K Ashley
TKTaka Kato
Taka Kato
WHWilliam H. Hanneman
William H. Hanneman
Canine and human osteosarcoma (OSA) have many similarities, with the majority of reported cases occurring in the appendicular skeleton, gender predominance noted, high rate of metastasis at the time of presentation, and a lack of known etiology for this devastating disease. Due to poor understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying OSA, we have characterized seven different OSA canine cell lines: Abrams, D17, Grey, Hughes, Ingles, Jarques, and Marisco and compared them to U2, a human OSA cell line, for the following parameters: morphology, growth, contact inhibition, migrational tendencies, alkaline phosphatase staining, heterologous tumor growth, double-strand DNA breaks, and oxidative damage. All results demonstrated the positive characteristics of the Abrams cell line for use in future studies of OSA. Of particular interest, the robust growth of a subcutaneous tumor and rapid pulmonary metastasis of the Abrams cell line in an immunocompromised mouse shows incredible potential for the future use of Abrams as a canine OSA model. Further investigations utilizing a canine cell model of OSA, such as Abrams, will be invaluable to understanding the molecular events underlying OSA, pharmaceutical inhibition of metastasis, and eventual prevention of this devastating disease.

1 April 2014 in Domestic Animal Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KQK.E. Quinn
K.E. Quinn
Amanda K AshleyAmanda K Ashley
Amanda K Ashley
LRLawrence Reynolds
Lawrence Reynolds
AGA.T. Grazul-Bilska
A.T. Grazul-Bilska
Ryan AshleyRyan Ashley
Ryan Ashley