Mingtao Jiang

Dr. Mingtao Jiang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

12 November 2024 in Journal of Ocean University of China
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
HBHaoyang Ban
Haoyang Ban
CMChenhao Mao
Chenhao Mao
HLHuidi Liang
Huidi Liang
MJMingtao Jiang
Mingtao Jiang

11 January 2023 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
WLWenlong Liu
Wenlong Liu
HLHuidi Liang
Huidi Liang
MJMingtao Jiang
Mingtao Jiang
Zili DaiZili Dai
Zili Dai

10 March 2025 in Journal of Ocean University of China
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZDZili Dai
Zili Dai
BLBaisen Lan
Baisen Lan
MJMingtao Jiang
Mingtao Jiang
JSJiang Shenghui
Jiang Shenghui

10 February 2026 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZDZili Dai
Zili Dai
CWChong Wang
Chong Wang
RPRenfeng Peng
Renfeng Peng
MJMingtao Jiang
Mingtao Jiang

1 January 2025 in Physics of Fluids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MJMingtao Jiang
Mingtao Jiang
XTXingrui Tao
Xingrui Tao
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
Zili DaiZili Dai
Zili Dai
In underwater explosion simulations, the accuracy is critically affected by numerical diffusion and the quality of the computational grid. An enhanced interface-sharpening algorithm, based on the five-equation model and an anti-diffusion source term, is proposed to simulate the strongly compressible multiphase flow with an arbitrary number of phases in underwater explosions. To enhance the precision of interface and maintain computational stability on nonuniform and unstructured grids, an adaptive factor algorithm and a continuous interface capture function are developed. Furthermore, a redesigned fractional step method incorporating a special iteration stop criteria is proposed to solve the volume fraction equation. A pressure–density cutoff model is used to calculate the mixture density at the saturation pressure to account for the effect of cavitation. The quadratic monotone upstream-centered scheme for conservation laws reconstruction scheme and the improved advection upstream splitting method (AUSM+-up) flux scheme are also adopted to compute the flux across the grid interfaces. The overall computational framework is constructed upon a density-based explicit finite volume method. To assess the accuracy and robustness of the proposed numerical model, four representative test cases were chosen. The results reveal that the model refines the phase interface, adeptly capturing the complexities inherent in underwater explosion scenarios with both precision and efficiency across a diverse array of conditions.