Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is associated with delayed MTX-excretion and life-threatening toxicity. Glucapridase, the recommended therapy, is expensive and not always available. Case series: We describe 3 cases (69, 67, 73 years) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who developed AKI and early-onset severely delayed MTX elimination after HD-MTX. MTX serum concentrations were 101 and 69 μmol/L at 24 h after administration in two patients and 34 μmol/L at 32 h in the third. Management and outcome: Since glucarpidase was unavailable, we performed daily high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) or online hemodiafiltration (HDF) sessions (median duration, 6 h). The median serum MTX elimination half-life during HDF/HF-HD sessions was similar in all patients (median, 4.4 h; IQR, 3.8–5.3 h), but serum MTX concentrations rebounded after each dialysis by a median of 40% of the trough concentrations. The three patients underwent multiple dialysis sessions, until MTX serum concentrations remained sufficiently low to be neutralized by leucovorin. Only 1 patient developed severe pancytopenia, and renal function normalized in all patients after 3–6 weeks. Discussion: In conclusion, when glucarpidase is unavailable or delayed, early, repeated and prolonged HDF/HF-HD effectively enhance MTX elimination and prevent toxicity in patients with AKI and severely delayed MTX elimination after HD-MTX.

Purpose: To examine the feasibility and utility of a clinical pharmacist-led multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention in hospitalized cancer patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among cancer patients hospitalized in oncology department who underwent a medication review by a clinical pharmacist. The pharmacist's recommendations were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. We collected demographic and clinical information, including information on medication burden before and after intervention and number and types of deprescribing recommendations and their acceptance, and compared them among patients with different estimated life expectancies. Results: During a 2-year study period, 392 patients evaluated by the clinical pharmacist received 2808 prescriptions (median, 7 per patient). The clinical pharmacist recommended deprescribing of 559 medications (19.9%; 95 CI, 18.4–21.4%), at least 1 medication in 321 patients (82%). The multidisciplinary team accepted 89.6% of deprescribing recommendations, resulting in a reduction of the medication burden by 501 medications ( P < 0.001). 12.8% of deprescriptions addressed clinically manifested adverse drug effects in 15.1% of patients. The estimation of life expectancy by the senior oncologist was reasonably accurate, but did not affect deprescribing rate. Conclusions: A clinical pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention within a multidisciplinary team effectively reduces medication burden and addresses adverse drug effects in cancer patients. Deprescribing interventions should be incorporated in cancer patients at any stage of the disease.

To report a case of ribavirin-associated severe hyperuricemia in an immunocompromised patient treated for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. A 21-year-old male with a past medical history of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia was in full remission after allogenic bone marrow transplantation complicated with chronic graft-versus-host disease. He was hospitalized due to fever, malaise, and respiratory symptoms. A diagnosis of RSV upper respiratory tract infection complicated by secondary pneumonia was made, and oral ribavirin (600 mg in 3 divided doses daily) and intravenous levofloxacin (750 mg once daily) were initiated. On day 2 of the hospital admission, the patient’s uric acid levels had increased from a baseline of 4 to 6 mg/dL to 19.3 and 22.2 mg/dL after the fourth and fifth doses of ribavirin, respectively, and his serum creatinine steadily had increased from a baseline of 0.7 to 0.8 mg/dL to 1.6 mg/dL. Ribavirin was discontinued after the sixth dose, and a single dose of intravenous rasburicase (7.5 mg) was administered. On day 3, the patient’s serum uric and creatinine concentrations had decreased to 4.7 mg/dL and 1.1 mg/dL, respectively. He continued to recover on antibiotics and was discharged with normal uric acid and serum creatinine levels. We report a case of severe hyperuricemia and acute kidney injury that developed early after initiation of ribavirin for RSV infection and suspected bacterial pneumonia in an immunocompromised patient without hepatitis C, requiring ribavirin discontinuation and rasburicase administration. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of severe hyperuricemia in a patient treated with ribavirin for RSV infection rather than chronic hepatitis C. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of acute and severe hyperuricemia following ribavirin administration.

Background/Objectives: Busulfan is a key component of myeloablative conditioning regimens in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia, solid tumors, and certain non-malignant diseases. This study compares the clinical outcomes of once-daily (BU1) versus four-times-daily (BU4) busulfan dosing regimens in pediatric HSCT recipients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 70 pediatric patients who underwent HSCT at Hadassah Medical Center between June 2018 and October 2023. Thirty-five patients received the BU4 regimen, and 35 received BU1. The primary endpoint was 100-day event-free survival (EFS). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in 100-day event-free survival between the BU1 group (88.6%) and the BU4 group (85.7%; p = 0.768). Similarly, no significant differences were found in time to neutrophil engraftment (p = 0.251) or platelet engraftment (p = 0.688). Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) occurred in 17.1% of patients in each group. No significant differences were observed in the increase in liver enzyme levels (p = 1.0). The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was comparable between the groups (41.9% for BU1 vs. 40.0% for BU4; p = 0.878). Conclusions: Once-daily and four-times-daily busulfan regimens demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes in terms of efficacy and adverse events. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.