Shailendra Maurya

Dr. Shailendra Maurya

Developmental Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2021 in Epigenomes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shailendra MauryaShailendra Maurya
Shailendra Maurya
Enhancers are cis-regulatory elements containing short DNA sequences that serve as binding sites for pioneer/regulatory transcription factors, thus orchestrating the regulation of genes critical for lineage determination. The activity of enhancer elements is believed to be determined by transcription factor binding, thus determining the cell state identity during development. Precise spatio-temporal control of the transcriptome during lineage specification requires the coordinated binding of lineage-specific transcription factors to enhancers. Thus, enhancers are the primary determinants of cell identity. Numerous studies have explored the role and mechanism of enhancers during development and disease, and various basic questions related to the functions and mechanisms of enhancers have not yet been fully answered. In this review, we discuss the recently published literature regarding the roles of enhancers, which are critical for various biological processes governing development. Furthermore, we also highlight that altered enhancer landscapes provide an essential context to understand the etiologies and mechanisms behind numerous complex human diseases, providing new avenues for effective enhancer-based therapeutic interventions.

14 November 2014 in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shailendra MauryaShailendra Maurya
Shailendra Maurya
TKTridiv Katiyar
Tridiv Katiyar
ADAnkur Dhawan
Ankur Dhawan
SSSudhir Singh
Sudhir Singh
SJSwatantra K. Jain
Swatantra K. Jain
DPDevendra Parmar
Devendra Parmar

23 September 2024 in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNitin Sagar
Nitin Sagar
BCBandana Chakravarti
Bandana Chakravarti
Shailendra MauryaShailendra Maurya
Shailendra Maurya
ANAnshul Nigam
Anshul Nigam
PMPushkar Malakar
Pushkar Malakar
RKRajesh Kashyap
Rajesh Kashyap
Introduction: 3D-printed scaffolds have emerged as an alternative for addressing the current limitations encountered in bone reconstruction. This study aimed to systematically review the feasibility of using 3D bio-printed scaffolds as a material for bone grafting in animal models, focusing on femoral and tibial defects. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and overall impact of these scaffolds on bone regeneration.Methods: Electronic databases were searched using specific search terms from January 2013 to October 2023, and 37 relevant studies were finally included and reviewed. We documented the type of scaffold generated using the 3D printed techniques, detailing its characterization and rheological properties including porosity, compressive strength, shrinkage, elastic modulus, and other relevant factors. Before incorporating them into the meta-analysis, an additional inclusion criterion was applied where the regenerated bone area (BA), bone volume (BV), bone volume per total volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th.), trabecular number (Tb. N.), and trabecular separation (Tb. S.) were collected and analyzed statistically.Results: 3D bio-printed ceramic-based composite scaffolds exhibited the highest capacity for bone tissue regeneration (BTR) regarding BV/TV of femoral and tibial defects of animal models. The ideal structure of the printed scaffolds displayed optimal results with a total porosity >50% with a pore size ranging between 300- and 400 µM. Moreover, integrating additional features and engineered macro-channels within these scaffolds notably enhanced BTR capacity, especially observed at extended time points.Discussion: In conclusion, 3D-printed composite scaffolds have shown promise as an alternative for addressing bone defects.

17 February 2020 in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TKTridiv Katiyar
Tridiv Katiyar
VYVinay Yadav
Vinay Yadav
Shailendra MauryaShailendra Maurya
Shailendra Maurya
MRMunindra Ruwali
Munindra Ruwali
MSMadhu Singh
Madhu Singh
DPDevendra Parmar
Devendra Parmar

5 December 2013 in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Shailendra MauryaShailendra Maurya
Shailendra Maurya
GAGautam Anand
Gautam Anand
ADAnkur Dhawan
Ankur Dhawan
AKAnwar J. Khan
Anwar J. Khan
SJSwatantra K. Jain
Swatantra K. Jain
DPDevendra Parmar
Devendra Parmar

25 July 2021 in Epigenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Shailendra MauryaShailendra Maurya
Shailendra Maurya
WYWei Yang
Wei Yang
MTMinori Tamai
Minori Tamai
QZQiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang
PEPetra Erdmann-Gilmore
Petra Erdmann-Gilmore
TDTodd E. Druley
Todd E. Druley
Germline or somatic variation in the family of KMT2 lysine methyltransferases have been associated with a variety of congenital disorders and cancers. Notably, KMT2A-fusions are prevalent in 70% of infant leukaemias but fail to phenocopy short latency leukaemogenesis in mammalian models, suggesting additional factors are necessary for transformation. Given the lack of additional somatic mutation, the role of epigenetic regulation in cell specification, and our prior results of germline KMT2C variation in infant leukaemia patients, we hypothesized that germline dysfunction of KMT2C altered haematopoietic specification. In isogenic KMT2C KO hPSCs, we found genome-wide differences in histone modifications at active and poised enhancers, leading to gene expression profiles akin to mesendoderm rather than mesoderm highlighted by a significant increase in NODAL expression and WNT inhibition, ultimately resulting in a lack of in vitro hemogenic endothelium specification. These unbiased multi-omic results provide new evidence for germline mechanisms increasing risk of early leukaemogenesis.