The magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stagnation point flow of Casson nanofluid over a nonlinear stretching sheet in the presence of velocity slip and convective boundary condition is examined. In this analysis, various effects such as velocity ratio, viscous dissipation, heat generation/absorption and chemical reaction are accentuated. Possessions of Brownian motion and thermophoresis are also depicted in this study. A uniform magnetic field as well as suction is taken into account. Suitable similarity transformations are availed to convert the governing nonlinear partial differential equations to a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations and then series solutions are secured using a homotopy analysis method (HAM). Notable accuracy of the present results has been obtained with the earlier results. Impact of distinct parameters on velocity, temperature, concentration, skin friction coefficient,Nusselt number and Sherwood number is canvassed through graphs and tabular forms.

In this paper, we rely on the Constructal method to optimize the geometry of a Y-shaped cavity embedded into a solid conducting wall. The structure has four degrees of freedom. The objective is to minimize the global thermal resistance between the solid and the cavity. The optimization procedure has demonstrated that for larger solids, a cavity shaped as T led to a minimization of the global thermal resistance, while the opposite effect is observed for tall solids, where the optimal shapes are reached when the bifurcated branches deeply penetrates the solid in the vertical direction, according to the Constructal principle of “optimal distribution of imperfections”. The three times minimized global thermal resistance of the Y-shaped cavity has been correlated by power laws as a function of its corresponding optimal configurations. Finally, the performance of the Y-shaped intrusion proved to be superior to that of other basic geometries: the optimized global thermal resistances of the Y-shaped cavities obtained for H/L = 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 were, respectively 66.61%, 55.37%, and 19.05% lower than the optimal T-shaped cavities under the same thermal and geometric conditions. Furthermore, in comparison with the “finger cavity” shaped as C, the Y-shaped cavities increased the thermal performance in 109.12%, 84.45%, 59.32%, and 20.10% for H/L = 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0, respectively.