Wound management represents a substantial clinical challenge due to the growing incidence of chronic skin wounds resulting from venous insufficiency, diabetes, and obesity, along with acute injuries and surgical wounds. The risk of infection, a key impediment to healing and a driver of increased morbidity and mortality, is a primary concern in wound care. Recently, antimicrobial dressings have emerged as a promising approach for bioburden control and wound healing. The selection of a suitable antimicrobial dressing depends on various parameters, including cost, wound type, local microbial burden and the location and condition of the wound. This review covers the different types of antimicrobial dressings, their modes of action, advantages, and drawbacks, thereby providing clinicians with the knowledge to optimize wound management.

Background: Fluoroquinolones, available in topical and oral formulations, are used to manage bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, atypical mycobacteria, and select multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. Their excellent tissue penetration, bactericidal activity, and convenient dosing make them effective for certain skin and soft tissue infections. However, their use is limited by potential safety concerns, including tendinopathy (odds ratio up to 9.1 in corticosteroid users), QT interval prolongation with risk of torsades de pointes, phototoxicity, and rising antimicrobial resistance. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for articles from January 1985 to April 2025 with the search terms (quinolone OR fluoroquinolone) AND (dermatology OR “skin and soft tissue infection” OR “skin structure infection”). Abstracts and presentations were excluded. A Google search used the same terms for articles from government regulatory agencies. Results: This review provides practical guidance on the clinical use of topical and oral fluoroquinolones in dermatology. Delafloxacin demonstrated over 90% cure rates in trials for complicated skin infections. However, serious safety concerns remain, including a ninefold increase in tendinopathy risk among older adults on corticosteroids and corrected QT intervals exceeding 500 milliseconds in high-risk patients. Phototoxicity varies, with agents like sparfloxacin linked to heightened ultraviolet sensitivity. Resistance to ciprofloxacin exceeds 20 percent in Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa in some populations. Culture-based prescribing, shorter treatment courses, and preference for topical treatments can reduce risk and preserve efficacy. Conclusions: Fluoroquinolones remain clinically useful in dermatology when prescribed selectively. Their appropriate use requires careful attention to patient risk factors along with their evolving resistance patterns and ongoing stewardship efforts.

Ameneni G, et al. Ann Dermatol. 2026 Jun;38(3):256-258. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.25.069