Objective To measure the global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of IV thrombolysis (IVT), IVT transfers, and stroke hospitalizations over 4 months at the height of the pandemic (March 1 to June 30, 2020) compared with 2 control 4-month periods. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study across 6 continents, 70 countries, and 457 stroke centers. Diagnoses were identified by their ICD-10 codes or classifications in stroke databases. Results There were 91,373 stroke admissions in the 4 months immediately before compared to 80,894 admissions during the pandemic months, representing an 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] −11.7 to −11.3, p < 0.0001) decline. There were 13,334 IVT therapies in the 4 months preceding compared to 11,570 procedures during the pandemic, representing a 13.2% (95% CI −13.8 to −12.7, p < 0.0001) drop. Interfacility IVT transfers decreased from 1,337 to 1,178, or an 11.9% decrease (95% CI −13.7 to −10.3, p = 0.001). Recovery of stroke hospitalization volume (9.5%, 95% CI 9.2–9.8, p < 0.0001) was noted over the 2 later (May, June) vs the 2 earlier (March, April) pandemic months. There was a 1.48% stroke rate across 119,967 COVID-19 hospitalizations. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was noted in 3.3% (1,722/52,026) of all stroke admissions. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a global decline in the volume of stroke hospitalizations, IVT, and interfacility IVT transfers. Primary stroke centers and centers with higher COVID-19 inpatient volumes experienced steeper declines. Recovery of stroke hospitalization was noted in the later pandemic months.

Background: The prognostic value of the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in ischemic stroke remains debated due to cohort variability and treatment heterogeneity across studies. This study evaluates the relationship between admission NLR, stroke severity and 90-day outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing early, successful revascularization. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with 1082 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. The relationship between admission NLR, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), 24 h NIHSS and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcomes was analyzed using logistic regression. Results: Admission NLR correlated weakly but significantly with both baseline (p = 0.018) and 24 h (p = 0.005) NIHSS scores, reflecting stroke severity. However, multivariate analysis showed that higher 24 h NIHSS scores (OR 0.831, p = 0.000) and prolonged puncture-to-recanalization times (OR 0.981, p = 0.000) were independent predictors of poor 90-day outcomes, whereas NLR was not (p = 0.557). Conclusions: Admission NLR is associated with stroke severity but does not independently predict clinical outcomes at 90 days in patients achieving early and successful revascularization. These findings underscore the critical role of inflammation in the acute phase of stroke but suggest that its prognostic value for long-term outcomes is limited in this context.

Background/Objectives: The C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) has emerged as an inflammatory biomarker reflecting innate and adaptive immune responses. Its prognostic value in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy remains unclear. This study investigated whether CLR predicts functional outcome, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 714 patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy between January 2024 and January 2025 were analyzed. Clinical, angiographic, and laboratory data, including CLR, were collected. CLR was calculated as CRP divided by lymphocyte count/1000. Outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS; poor outcome = 3–6; mortality = 6) and sICH per ECASS II. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified optimal CLR cut-offs. Logistic regression analyses determined independent predictors of outcomes. Results: sICH occurred in 39 patients (5.5%). CLR correlated with higher baseline NIHSS and lower ASPECTS. ROC analyses showed that CLR predicted poor functional outcome and mortality with an identical cut-off (≥7.51; AUCs 0.634 and 0.664), and demonstrated strong discrimination for sICH (cut-off ≥ 10.64; AUC 0.855). In multivariable analyses, CLR remained an independent predictor across all outcomes (ORs 1.02, 1.02, and 1.03, all p < 0.001), in addition to established clinical factors. Conclusions: Admission CLR was independently associated with poor outcomes, mortality, and sICH after mechanical thrombectomy. As an easily obtainable marker from routine laboratory tests, CLR may provide additional prognostic information and complement established predictors, but prospective validation is required.

Purpose: In a minority of cases, the transfemoral approach cannot be performed due to unfavorable anatomical barriers. In such cases, direct common carotid artery puncture (DCCAP) is an important alternative for rescue mechanical thrombectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCCAP in patients with an unaccessible femoral route for mechanical thrombectomy.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study using data in the Turkish Interventional Neurology Database recorded between January 2015 and April 2019. Twenty-five acute stroke patients treated with DCCAP were analyzed in this study. Among 25 cases with carotid puncture, 4 cases were excluded due to an aborted thrombectomy attempt resulting from unsuccessful sheath placement.Results: Patients had a mean age of 69±12 years. The average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 16±4. Successful revascularization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 2b-3) rate was 86% (18/21), and 90-day good functional outcome rate (modified Rankin Scale 0–2) was 38% (8/21).Conclusion: DCCAP is a rescue alternative for patients with unfavorable access via the transfemoral route. Timely switching to DCCAP is crucial in these cases.