Background: Olmesartan-induced enteropathy is a rare complication of a widely used angiotensin II receptor blocker. Patients usually present with chronic diarrhea and weight loss. Histologically, villous atrophy and intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltrates within the duodenum confirm the diagnosis. The prognosis is usually good after withdrawal of the offending drug. Case presentation: Here, we report the case of a 76-year-old woman who developed a severe form of Olmesartan-induced enteropathy complicated by acute kidney injury and acute recurrence after drug rechallenge. After definite cessation of the drug, the patient did not experience any gastrointestinal (GI) symptom recurrence after 6 months of follow-up. However, she experienced chronic kidney disease stage G3b. Histological analysis did not show any villous atrophy or intraepithelial lymphocyte infiltrates within the duodenum or the colon biopsy. Discussion and conclusion: This case highlights the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and histological findings in Olmesartan-induced enteropathy. It also highlights the importance of rapid diagnosis in order to limit organ damage such as chronic kidney disease.

Introduction: Endothelial dysfunction is a common feature of end-stage kidney disease, requiring hemodialysis (HD) and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) persistent positivity. Endothelial dysfunction can be assessed with noninvasive tests such as flow-mediated dilation (FMD). In the HD population, it is not known whether aPL persistent positivity is associated with a more severe endothelial dysfunction. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study in our HD patients. The FMD of the brachial artery was measured in 17 aPL-positive patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were matched to 17 controls according to age, gender, diabetes mellitus, smoking status and markers of dialysis adequacy (Kt/V). Results: FMD was significantly lower in the aPL group with a mean of 6.9% and 11.8% in the aPL-positive and the control groups, respectively (mean difference (IC 95%): −4.9 (−8.3; −1.6), p = 0.006). aPL was associated with a higher c-reactive protein level, and longer HD vintage. There was no statistical difference between groups in terms of pre-dialysis urea and urinary output, dialysis adequacy (Kt/V), and history of cardiovascular disease or treatments. Conclusions: aPL persistent positivity in HD patients was associated with worse endothelial dysfunction, reflected by FMD measurements. These findings have to be confirmed in larger studies.