Background and Objectives: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems represent a major advancement in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, particularly in pediatric populations. However, real-world evidence comparing their effectiveness to conventional multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy in youth remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of transitioning from MDI therapy to AID systems on glycemic control in children and adolescents with T1D, and to explore potential differences based on baseline HbA1c levels and device type. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, 76 children and adolescents with T1D were evaluated before and after switching from MDI to either the Medtronic MiniMed™ 780G or Tandem t:slim X2™ Control-IQ system. Glycemic control was assessed using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics at three time points: the last 15 days of MDI therapy (T0), 15 days after (T1), and 6 months after (T2) AID initiation. Statistical comparisons were conducted across time points and between subgroups stratified by baseline HbA1c and AID system. Results: Significant improvements in glycemic control were observed as early as 15 days after AID initiation, with sustained benefits at 6 months. Time in range (TIR) increased from 62.0% at baseline to 76.7% at 15 days and 75.8% at 6 months, and time in tight range (TITR) from 39.8% to 53.9% at T1 and 52.1% at T2 (both p < 0.001). Improvements were more pronounced in participants with higher baseline HbA1c (+16.9% for TITR and +22.3% for TIR). No significant differences in glycemic outcomes were observed between device groups, although algorithm-driven differences in insulin delivery patterns were noted. Total daily insulin dose and BMI increased significantly over time (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively). Conclusions: AID therapy leads to rapid and sustained improvements in glycemic control among youth with T1D, particularly in those with suboptimal baseline control. These benefits highlight the clinical value of AID systems, while also emphasizing the need for monitoring potential metabolic impacts.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a common chronic autoimmune disease in childhood, often presenting abruptly and frequently complicated by diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis. T1D develops through well-defined presymptomatic stages characterized by islet autoimmunity and progressive dysglycemia, offering a window for early identification. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on screening for T1D in children and adolescents, focusing on target populations, screening strategies, and methodological approaches for autoantibody detection. Data from major international programs involving familial, high-risk, and general population screening are discussed, highlighting their impact on reducing diabetic ketoacidosis at onset, improving metabolic outcomes, and facilitating structured follow-up and family education. Advances in assay technologies, including electrochemiluminescence, multiplex platforms, and novel ultrasensitive methods, have enhanced the feasibility and accuracy of large-scale screening. The review also examines the public health implications, cost-effectiveness, and ethical considerations of implementing population-based screening, particularly in light of emerging disease-modifying therapies such as teplizumab. Overall, available evidence supports screening as a meaningful strategy to shift T1D diagnosis from an acute emergency to a predictable clinical trajectory, with potential benefits extending from individual patient outcomes to healthcare system sustainability.