Michael R. Sperling

Dr. Michael R. Sperling

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 May 2022 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EHEdouard Hirsch
Edouard Hirsch
JFJacqueline French
Jacqueline French
ISIngrid E. Scheffer
Ingrid E. Scheffer
ABAlicia Bogacz
Alicia Bogacz
Taoufik AlsaadiTaoufik Alsaadi
Taoufik Alsaadi
EWElaine C. Wirrell
Elaine C. Wirrell
In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of Epilepsies described the “genetic generalized epilepsies” (GGEs), which contained the “idiopathic generalized epilepsies” (IGEs). The goal of this paper is to delineate the four syndromes comprising the IGEs, namely childhood absence epilepsy, juvenile absence epilepsy, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, and epilepsy with generalized tonic–clonic seizures alone. We provide updated diagnostic criteria for these IGE syndromes determined by the expert consensus opinion of the ILAE’s Task Force on Nosology and Definitions (2017–2021) and international external experts outside our Task Force. We incorporate current knowledge from recent advances in genetic, imaging, and electroencephalographic studies, together with current terminology and classification of seizures and epilepsies. Patients that do not fulfill criteria for one of these syndromes, but that have one, or a combination, of the following generalized seizure types: absence, myoclonic, tonic‐clonic and myoclonic‐tonic‐clonic seizures, with 2.5–5.5 Hz generalized spike‐wave should be classified as having GGE. Recognizing these four IGE syndromes as a special grouping among the GGEs is helpful, as they carry prognostic and therapeutic implications.

23 April 2025 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBSándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky
ETEugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka
EWElaine Wirrell
Elaine Wirrell
FAFatema Abdulla
Fatema Abdulla
RBRaidah Al Baradie
Raidah Al Baradie
JCJ. Helen Cross
J. Helen Cross
The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has updated the operational classification of epileptic seizures, building upon the framework established in 2017. This revision, informed by the implementation experience, involved a working group appointed by the ILAE Executive Committee. Comprising 37 members from all ILAE regions, the group utilized a modified Delphi process, requiring a consensus threshold of more than two thirds for any proposal. Following public comments, the Executive Committee appointed seven additional experts to the revision task force to address and incorporate the issues raised, as appropriate. The updated classification maintains four main seizure classes: Focal, Generalized, Unknown (whether focal or generalized), and Unclassified. Taxonomic rules distinguish classifiers, which are considered to reflect biological classes and directly impact clinical management, from descriptors, which indicate other important seizure characteristics. Focal seizures and those of unknown origin are further classified by the patient's state of consciousness (impaired or preserved) during the seizure, defined operationally through clinical assessment of awareness and responsiveness. If the state of consciousness is undetermined, the seizure is classified under the parent term, that is, the main seizure class (focal seizure or seizure of unknown origin). Generalized seizures are grouped into absence seizures, generalized tonic–clonic seizures, and other generalized seizures, now including recognition of negative myoclonus as a seizure type. Seizures are described in the basic version as with or without observable manifestations, whereas an expanded version utilizes the chronological sequence of seizure semiology. This updated classification comprises four main classes and 21 seizure types. Special emphasis was placed on ensuring translatability into languages beyond English. Its aim is to establish a common language for all health care professionals involved in epilepsy care, from resource‐limited areas to highly specialized centers, and to provide accessible terms for patients and caregivers.

8 April 2021 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VSVicenta Salanova
Vicenta Salanova
MSMichael R. Sperling
Michael R. Sperling
RGRobert E. Gross
Robert E. Gross
CIChris P. Irwin
Chris P. Irwin
JVJim A. Vollhaber
Jim A. Vollhaber
SGSANTÉ Study Group
SANTÉ Study Group

11 October 2006 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJyoti Pillai
Jyoti Pillai
MSMichael R. Sperling
Michael R. Sperling

27 October 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GUGray Umbach
Gray Umbach
PKPranish Kantak
Pranish Kantak
JJJoshua Jacobs
Joshua Jacobs
MKMichael Kahana
Michael Kahana
BPBrad E. Pfeiffer
Brad E. Pfeiffer
BLBradley Lega
Bradley Lega
Significance: Time cells are neurons in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex that fire at specific moments within a cognitive task or experience. While many prominent theories of memory encoding offer time cells as the source of the temporal component to memory, they have never been observed in human recordings. We identify time cell populations in the medial temporal lobe of humans during memory encoding and retrieval. Further, we demonstrate that the stability of the time signal provided by time cells during encoding influences the ability to temporally order memories at time of retrieval.

12 May 2020 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichael R. Sperling
Michael R. Sperling
PKPavel Klein
Pavel Klein
SASami Aboumatar
Sami Aboumatar
MGMichael Gelfand
Michael Gelfand
JHJonathan J. Halford
Jonathan J. Halford
MKMarc Kamin
Marc Kamin
Objective: During the development of cenobamate, an antiseizure medication (ASM) for focal seizures, three cases of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) occurred. To mitigate the rate of DRESS, a start‐low, go‐slow approach was studied in an ongoing, open‐label, multicenter study. Also examined were long‐term safety of cenobamate and a method for managing the pharmacokinetic interaction between cenobamate, a 2C19 inhibitor, and concomitant phenytoin or phenobarbital.Methods: Patients 18‐70 years old with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of one to three ASMs were enrolled. Cenobamate 12.5 mg/d was initiated and increased at 2‐week intervals to 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/d. Additional biweekly 50 mg/d increases to 400 mg/d were allowed. During titration, patients taking phenytoin or phenobarbital could not have their cenobamate titration rate or other concomitant ASMs adjusted; phenytoin/phenobarbital doses could be decreased by 25%‐33%.Results: At data cutoff (median treatment duration = 9 months), 1347 patients were enrolled, of whom 269 (20.0%) discontinued, most commonly due to adverse events (n = 137) and consent withdrawn for reason other than adverse event (n = 74); 1339 patients received ≥1 treatment dose (median modal dose = 200 mg). The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were somnolence (28.1%), dizziness (23.6%), and fatigue (16.6%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 108 patients (8.1%), most commonly seizure (n = 14), epilepsy (n = 5), and pneumonia, fall, and dizziness (n = 4 each). No cases of DRESS were identified. In the phenytoin/phenobarbital groups, 43.4% (36/114) and 29.7% (11/51) of patients, respectively, had their doses decreased. At the end of titration, mean plasma phenytoin/phenobarbital levels were generally comparable to baseline.Significance: No cases of DRESS were identified in 1339 patients exposed to cenobamate using a start‐low (12.5 mg/d), go‐slow titration approach. Cenobamate was generally well tolerated in the long term, with no new safety issues found. Phenytoin/phenobarbital dose reductions (25%‐33%), when needed during cenobamate titration, maintained stable plasma levels.