Arabella Young

Arabella Young


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in Cancer Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJing Liu
Jing Liu
SBStephen J. Blake
Stephen J. Blake
MYMichelle C.R. Yong
Michelle C.R. Yong
HHHeidi Harjunpää
Heidi Harjunpää
SNShin Foong Ngiow
Shin Foong Ngiow
MTMichele W.L. Teng
Michele W.L. Teng
Immunotherapy has recently entered a renaissance phase with the approval of multiple agents for the treatment of cancer. Immunotherapy stands ready to join traditional modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and hormone therapy, as a pillar of cancer treatment. Although immunotherapy has begun to have success in advanced cancer treatment, its scheduling and efficacy with surgery to treat earlier stages of cancer and prevent distant metastases have not been systematically examined. Here, we have used two models of spontaneously metastatic breast cancers in mice to illustrate the significantly greater therapeutic power of neoadjuvant, compared with adjuvant, immunotherapies in the context of primary tumor resection. Elevated and sustained peripheral tumor-specific immune responses underpinned the outcome, and blood sampling of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells immediately prior to and post surgery may provide a predictor of outcome. These data now provide a strong rationale to extensively test and compare neoadjuvant immunotherapy in humans. Significance: We demonstrate the significantly greater therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant, compared with adjuvant, immunotherapies to eradicate distant metastases following primary tumor resection. Elevated and sustained peripheral tumor-specific immune responses underpinned the outcome, and blood sampling of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells immediately prior to and post surgery may provide a predictor of outcome. Cancer Discov; 6(12); 1382–99. ©2016 AACR. See related commentary by Melero et al., p. 1312. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1293

1 December 2017 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DVDipti Vijayan
Dipti Vijayan
AYArabella Young
Arabella Young
MTMichele W.L. Teng
Michele W.L. Teng
MSMark J. Smyth
Mark J. Smyth

31 July 2017 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YGYulong Gao
Yulong Gao
Fernando Souza-Fonseca-GuimaraesFernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes
Fernando Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes
TBTobias Bald
Tobias Bald
SNSusanna S Ng
Susanna S Ng
AYArabella Young
Arabella Young
MSMark J Smyth
Mark J Smyth

24 June 2018 in Diabetes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAngeliki M. Stamatouli
Angeliki M. Stamatouli
ZQZoe Quandt
Zoe Quandt
APAna Luisa Perdigoto
Ana Luisa Perdigoto
PCPamela L. Clark
Pamela L. Clark
HKHarriet Kluger
Harriet Kluger
KHKevan C. Herold
Kevan C. Herold
Insulin-dependent diabetes may occur in patients with cancers who are treated with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). We reviewed cases occurring over a 6-year period at two academic institutions and identified 27 patients in whom this developed, or an incidence of 0.9%. The patients had a variety of solid-organ cancers, but all had received either anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 antibodies. Diabetes presented with ketoacidosis in 59%, and 42% had evidence of pancreatitis in the peridiagnosis period. Forty percent had at least one positive autoantibody and 21% had two or more. There was a predominance of HLA-DR4, which was present in 76% of patients. Other immune adverse events were seen in 70%, and endocrine adverse events in 44%. We conclude that autoimmune, insulin-dependent diabetes occurs in close to 1% of patients treated with anti–PD-1 or –PD-L1 CPIs. This syndrome has similarities and differences compared with classic type 1 diabetes. The dominance of HLA-DR4 suggests an opportunity to identify those at highest risk of these complications and to discover insights into the mechanisms of this adverse event.

1 September 2016 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AYArabella Young
Arabella Young
SNShin Foong Ngiow
Shin Foong Ngiow
DBDeborah S. Barkauskas
Deborah S. Barkauskas
ESErin Sult
Erin Sult
CHCarl Hay
Carl Hay
MSMark J. Smyth
Mark J. Smyth

14 February 2018 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AYArabella Young
Arabella Young
SNShin Foong Ngiow
Shin Foong Ngiow
YGYulong Gao
Yulong Gao
APAnn-Marie Patch
Ann-Marie Patch
DBDeborah S. Barkauskas
Deborah S. Barkauskas
MSMark J. Smyth
Mark J. Smyth
Extracellular adenosine is a key immunosuppressive metabolite that restricts activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes and impairs antitumor immune responses. Here, we show that engagement of A2A adenosine receptor (A2AR) acts as a checkpoint that limits the maturation of natural killer (NK) cells. Both global and NK-cell–specific conditional deletion of A2AR enhanced proportions of terminally mature NK cells at homeostasis, following reconstitution, and in the tumor microenvironment. Notably, A2AR-deficient, terminally mature NK cells retained proliferative capacity and exhibited heightened reconstitution in competitive transfer assays. Moreover, targeting A2AR specifically on NK cells also improved tumor control and delayed tumor initiation. Taken together, our results establish A2AR-mediated adenosine signaling as an intrinsic negative regulator of NK-cell maturation and antitumor immune responses. On the basis of these findings, we propose that administering A2AR antagonists concurrently with NK cell–based therapies may heighten therapeutic benefits by augmenting NK cell–mediated antitumor immunity. Significance: Ablating adenosine signaling is found to promote natural killer cell maturation and antitumor immunity and reduce tumor growth. Cancer Res; 78(4); 1003–16. ©2017 AACR.