Alejandra Carla Scannapieco

Prof. Dr. Alejandra Carla Scannapieco


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 July 2005 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jesper Givskov SørensenJesper Givskov Sørensen
Jesper Givskov Sørensen
JGJ. G.
J. G.
FNF. M. Norry
F. M. Norry
ASAlejandra Carla Scannapieco
Alejandra Carla Scannapieco
Volker LoeschchckeVolker Loeschchcke
Volker Loeschchcke

9 October 2008 in Molecular Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FNFabian Norry
Fabian Norry
ASAlejandra Carla Scannapieco
Alejandra Carla Scannapieco
PSPablo Sambucetti
Pablo Sambucetti
CBCarlos I. Bertoli
Carlos I. Bertoli
Volker LoeschchckeVolker Loeschchcke
Volker Loeschchcke

2 May 2024 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFabrice Requier
Fabrice Requier
MLMalena Sibaja Leyton
Malena Sibaja Leyton
CMCarolina L. Morales
Carolina L. Morales
LGLucas Alejandro Garibaldi
Lucas Alejandro Garibaldi
AGAgostina Giacobino
Agostina Giacobino
KAKarina Antúnez
Karina Antúnez
Over the last quarter century, increasing honey bee colony losses motivated standardized large-scale surveys of managed honey bees (Apis mellifera), particularly in Europe and the United States. Here we present the first large-scale standardized survey of colony losses of managed honey bees and stingless bees across Latin America. Overall, 1736 beekeepers and 165 meliponiculturists participated in the 2-year survey (2016–2017 and 2017–2018). On average, 30.4% of honey bee colonies and 39.6% of stingless bee colonies were lost per year across the region. Summer losses were higher than winter losses in stingless bees (30.9% and 22.2%, respectively) but not in honey bees (18.8% and 20.6%, respectively). Colony loss increased with operation size during the summer in both honey bees and stingless bees and decreased with operation size during the winter in stingless bees. Furthermore, losses differed significantly between countries and across years for both beekeepers and meliponiculturists. Overall, winter losses of honey bee colonies in Latin America (20.6%) position this region between Europe (12.5%) and the United States (40.4%). These results highlight the magnitude of bee colony losses occurring in the region and suggest difficulties in maintaining overall colony health and economic survival for beekeepers and meliponiculturists.

1 December 2014 in BMC Genomic Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMaría A Parreño
María A Parreño
ASAlejandra Carla Scannapieco
Alejandra Carla Scannapieco
MRMaría I Remis
María I Remis
MJMarianela Juri
Marianela Juri
SVSantiago de la Vega
Santiago de la Vega
SLSilvia B Lanzavecchia
Silvia B Lanzavecchia
Background: Anastrepha fraterculus is one of the most important fruit fly plagues in the American continent and only chemical control is applied in the field to diminish its population densities. A better understanding of the genetic variability during the introduction and adaptation of wild A. fraterculus populations to laboratory conditions is required for the development of stable and vigorous experimental colonies and mass-reared strains in support of successful Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) efforts. Methods: The present study aims to analyze the dynamics of changes in genetic variability during the first six generations under artificial rearing conditions in two populations: a) a wild population recently introduced to laboratory culture, named TW and, b) a long-established control line, named CL. Results: Results showed a declining tendency of genetic variability in TW. In CL, the relatively high values of genetic variability appear to be maintained across generations and could denote an intrinsic capacity to avoid the loss of genetic diversity in time. Discussion: The impact of evolutionary forces on this species during the adaptation process as well as the best approach to choose strategies to introduce experimental and mass-reared A. fraterculus strains for SIT programs are discussed.

22 October 2020 in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRomina M. Russo
Romina M. Russo
MLMaria C. Liendo
Maria C. Liendo
LLLucas Landi
Lucas Landi
HPHernán Pietronave
Hernán Pietronave
JMJulieta Merke
Julieta Merke
ASAlejandra Carla Scannapieco
Alejandra Carla Scannapieco
The Western honey bee, Apis mellifera, is an important species in providing honey and pollination services globally. The mite Varroa destructor is the major threat to A. mellifera, and it is associated with the severe colony winter mortality reported in recent decades. However, Varroa mite tolerant or resistant populations of A. mellifera have been detected around the world. A proposed mechanism responsible for limiting mite population growth in the colonies is grooming behavior, the physical removal and injury of mites from the adult bee bodies by individual workers or by their nest-mates. This behavioral strategy has been poorly studied in V. destructor-resistant colonies worldwide, especially in honey bee populations of European origin. In Argentina, honey bee stocks showing survival without mite treatment have been reported. In the present study, European-derived A. mellifera populations established in the Transition Chaco eco-region (Santa Fe province), with a subtropical climate, were characterized at the colony level. A honey bee stock showing natural Varroa-resistance (M) was compared to a Varroa-susceptible stock (C) for parameters of colony status (colony strength, percentage of Varroa infestation in adults and brood, hygienic behavior) and for indirect measures of grooming (percentage of fallen mites and damaged mites). M colonies showed lower phoretic and brood infestation and higher hygienic behavior in early autumn, and higher survival and population strength after wintering, in comparison with C colonies. The mean percentages of fallen mites and of damaged mites, and the injury to mites were higher in M than in C colonies. Our results suggest that, by modulating the parasitization dynamics in colonies, grooming behavior would be associated with the higher survival of Varroa-resistant stock. This study sheds light on how honey bee colonies can adaptively respond to mite pressure by modeling their behavior to resist Varroosis and provides evidence for grooming as an emerging factor evolving by natural selection. Percentage of damaged mites appears to be a reliable measure to enhance this behavior in honey bee colonies by selective breeding. Finally, the importance of improving and protecting locally adapted honey bee populations with natural Varroa resistance for regional apiculture is discussed.

1 September 2006 in Genetica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FNFabian Norry
Fabian Norry
PSP. Sambucetti
P. Sambucetti
ASAlejandra Carla Scannapieco
Alejandra Carla Scannapieco
Volker LoeschchckeVolker Loeschchcke
Volker Loeschchcke