Ben A. Croker

Prof. Ben A. Croker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 May 2003 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBen A. Croker
Ben A. Croker
DKDanielle L Krebs
Danielle L Krebs
JZJian-Guo Zhang
Jian-Guo Zhang
SWSam Wormald
Sam Wormald
TWTracy A Willson
Tracy A Willson
WAWarren S Alexander
Warren S Alexander

1 April 2006 in Annual Review of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BBBruce Beutler
Bruce Beutler
ZJZhengfan Jiang
Zhengfan Jiang
Philippe GeorgelPhilippe Georgel
Philippe Georgel
KCKarine Crozat
Karine Crozat
BCBen A. Croker
Ben A. Croker
KHKasper Hoebe
Kasper Hoebe
Classical genetic methods, driven by phenotype rather than hypotheses, generally permit the identification of all proteins that serve nonredundant functions in a defined biological process. Long before this goal is achieved, and sometimes at the very outset, genetics may cut to the heart of a biological puzzle. So it was in the field of mammalian innate immunity. The positional cloning of a spontaneous mutation that caused lipopolysaccharide resistance and susceptibility to Gram-negative infection led directly to the understanding that Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are essential sensors of microbial infection. Other mutations, induced by the random germ line mutagen ENU (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea), have disclosed key molecules in the TLR signaling pathways and helped us to construct a reasonably sophisticated portrait of the afferent innate immune response. A still broader genetic screen—one that detects all mutations that compromise survival during infection—is permitting fresh insight into the number and types of proteins that mammals use to defend themselves against microbes.

18 February 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKate E. Lawlor
Kate E. Lawlor
NKNufail Khan
Nufail Khan
AMAlison Mildenhall
Alison Mildenhall
MGMotti Gerlic
Motti Gerlic
BCBen A. Croker
Ben A. Croker
JVJames E. Vince
James E. Vince
RIPK3 and its substrate MLKL are essential for necroptosis, a lytic cell death proposed to cause inflammation via the release of intracellular molecules. Whether and how RIPK3 might drive inflammation in a manner independent of MLKL and cell lysis remains unclear. Here we show that following LPS treatment, or LPS-induced necroptosis, the TLR adaptor protein TRIF and inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs: X-linked IAP, cellular IAP1 and IAP2) regulate RIPK3 and MLKL ubiquitylation. Hence, when IAPs are absent, LPS triggers RIPK3 to activate caspase-8, promoting apoptosis and NLRP3–caspase-1 activation, independent of RIPK3 kinase activity and MLKL. In contrast, in the absence of both IAPs and caspase-8, RIPK3 kinase activity and MLKL are essential for TLR-induced NLRP3 activation. Consistent with in vitro experiments, interleukin-1 (IL-1)-dependent autoantibody-mediated arthritis is exacerbated in mice lacking IAPs, and is reduced by deletion of RIPK3, but not MLKL. Therefore RIPK3 can promote NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β inflammatory responses independent of MLKL and necroptotic cell death.

1 May 2014 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJames A. Rickard
James A. Rickard
JOJoanne A. O’donnell
Joanne A. O’donnell
JEJoseph M. Evans
Joseph M. Evans
NLNajoua Lalaoui
Najoua Lalaoui
APAshleigh Poh
Ashleigh Poh
JSJohn Silke
John Silke

1 August 2008 in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBen A. Croker
Ben A. Croker
HKHiu Kiu
Hiu Kiu
SNSandra E. Nicholson
Sandra E. Nicholson

1 December 2012 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMSeth L. Masters
Seth L. Masters
MGMotti Gerlic
Motti Gerlic
DMDonald Metcalf
Donald Metcalf
SPSimon Preston
Simon Preston
MPMarc Pellegrini
Marc Pellegrini
BCBen A. Croker
Ben A. Croker