The COPA syndrome is a newly recognized monogenic, autosomal dominant autoimmune disease presenting mostly presenting in childhood. Clinical features include inflammation of the lungs, kidneys, and joints. Approximately twenty-six patients with COPA syndrome worldwide have been investigated all originating from eight families. Patients with this syndrome exhibit heterozygous monogenic missense mutations in the WD40 domain. This domain is a functionally-significant area of the alpha subunit of coatomer-associated protein (COPα) which encodes the coat protein complex I (COPI). The COPI dysfunction is also associated with autoantibody expansion. We report two patients with COPA syndrome. All testing and molecular genetic analysis were performed after obtaining the informed consent of both the patient and parents. A retrospective chart review was carried out on both the patients. Demographic, clinical and laboratory findings were abstracted from outpatient and inpatient encounters. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), chest computed tomography (CT) scans, and lung biopsy histopathology reports were also reviewed and summarized. The index case and the father of the child both demonstrated a unique inflammatory pulmonary, arthritis, and renal disease triad starting in early childhood including pulmonary hemorrhage. The two patients had a novel COPA mutation previously undescribed. To date, only four pathological, genetic mutations have been reported that are compatible with COPA syndrome. We here report two patients with COPA syndrome within the same family with a novel COPA gene mutation different than the heterozygous monogenic missense mutations in the WD40 domain and distinct from the clinical phenotypes reported in the literature so far.

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) until recently have been considered a heterogeneous broad group of six autoimmune muscle diseases. Initially, autoantibodies in IIM (including JDM) and CD8+ T cell-induced cytotoxicity (PM and IBM) were the predominant recognized etiopathology mechanisms used to classify myopathies. In the early late 1990’s to 2000’s, evolving understanding of the molecules such as interleukin (IL), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interferon (IFN), and other cytokines as well as differences in response to therapies, has led IIM researchers to look beyond previous disease mechanisms. For decades the overexpression of Th1- associated cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-12) in the areas of inflammation in skin and muscle in IIM pointed to Th1 as the primary pathway for inflammation in myositis. However, in the last decade overexpression and elevated level of Th17-associated cytokines (IL-17, IL-22, and IL-6) were identified in the blood and the inflamed muscles of myositis patients. We also do not know how Th1 and Th2 cytokines work differently in diverse hosts, in different concentrations, in different inflammatory milieus, and in the presence or absence of each other or other adhesion/co-stimulatory molecules such as NF-κB. Also, several autoantibodies to intracellular organelles have been identified in myositis. In this review, we will discuss the most recent advances in IIM research and how that might bring new biologic therapies to market in the next 5–15 years to assist in the care of our most difficult IIM and JDM patients.

Background/Objectives: Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is the most common autoimmune rheumatic disease in children and can vary in presentation based on the properties of the JIA subtypes. Timely diagnosis and intervention are essential for maximizing quality of life, healthy growth and development, and prevention of long-term disability. This review aims to provide a clinically practical framework for the core elements important in recognition, monitoring, and management of JIA. Methods: We performed a narrative review of the current literature, complemented by real-world clinical experience from academic rheumatology practice. The review synthesizes evidence-based knowledge with practical insights to develop an approach that can be applied in daily clinical decision-making. Results: We propose a structured, stepwise method for evaluating suspected JIA, emphasizing the integration of pattern recognition with differential diagnosis. Our framework emphasizes two principal parameters: (1) the distribution of joint involvement (peripheral vs. axial) and (2) the presence of extra-articular manifestations, including uveitis, cutaneous findings, and gastrointestinal symptoms. This format aids in distinguishing major JIA subtypes and highlights their distinctive features. In addition, we review overarching principles for monitoring, assessing risk for uveitis, and treatment, and the importance of multidisciplinary care. Conclusions: This structured approach is intended to support clinicians in the accurate recognition of JIA and its subtypes, facilitate early diagnosis, and provide insights on management strategies that improve patient outcomes.