Intercropping is an eco-friendly, sustainable agricultural model that significantly improves yield stability, nutrient use efficiency, and soil health through spatiotemporal niche complementarity, increases biodiversity, and improves soil health. Water and nitrogen play crucial roles in limiting and regulating efficient resource utilization and ecological sustainability in intercropping systems. Synchronizing water and nitrogen inputs to match crop demands optimizes the spatiotemporal distribution of these resources, alleviates interspecific competition, and promotes mutualistic interactions, which significantly impacts crop growth, yield, and soil environment. This paper reviews the mechanisms of intercropping and water–nitrogen coupling regulation, aligning water and nitrogen supply with crop growth patterns, spatial configuration parameters, irrigation management techniques, and environmental climate change, and explores the response mechanisms of water–nitrogen coupling on crop growth, yield, and soil environmental adaptation. It can provide some references for researchers, extension agents, and policymakers. Research indicates that water–nitrogen coupling can enhance photosynthetic efficiency, promote root development, optimize nutrient uptake, and improve soil water dynamics, nitrogen cycling, and microbial community structures. Intercropping enhances the climate resilience of agricultural systems by leveraging species complementarity for resource utilization, strengthening ecosystem stability, and improving buffering capacity against climate change impacts such as extreme precipitation and temperature fluctuations. Future studies should further elucidate the differential effect of water–nitrogen coupling across regions and climatic conditions, focusing on multidimensional integrated administration strategies. Combining precision agriculture technologies and climate change predictions facilitates the development of more adaptive water–nitrogen coupling models to provide theoretical support and technical guarantees for sustainable agriculture.

Agricultural microplastics threaten soil health, yet rhizosphere microecological responses to microplastic stress in intercropping systems remain unclear. We conducted a pot experiment using two cropping systems (maize monocropping and maize–soybean intercropping) and four polyethylene microplastic (PE-MP) levels (0%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%) to investigate rhizosphere physicochemical properties and enzyme activities. Results showed a significant interaction between PE-MPs and cropping systems (p < 0.05). In MM, 0.1% PE-MPs exacerbated soil acidification (pH −4.32%) and ionic fluctuations (electrical conductivity +11.12%). At ≥0.5%, PE-MPs significantly decreased total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus, induced abnormal available phosphorus accumulation (up to +98.4%), and dose-dependently inhibited β-glucosidase, urease, and catalase activities. Conversely, the IM system exhibited buffering capacity, maintaining pH, electrical conductivity, and TN stability, mitigating nutrient imbalances, and preserving key enzyme functions. PLS-SEM revealed enzyme-specific associations, suggesting that cropping systems and PE-MPs drive enzyme activities primarily by regulating TN and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Conclusively, maize–soybean intercropping can buffer microplastic-induced physicochemical degradations, indicating its potential as an agronomic measure to mitigate microplastic pollution, though field-scale validations remain necessary.