Laboratory studies have shown the impact of phenotypic heterogeneity on the survival and functionality of isogenic populations. Because phenotypic heterogeneity plays an important role in pathogenicity and virulence, antibiotic resistance, biotechnological applications, and ecosystem properties, it is crucial to understand its influencing factors. An unanswered question is whether bacteria in mixed communities influence the phenotypic heterogeneity of their community partners. We found that coculturing bacteria leads to a reduction in their individual phenotypic heterogeneities, which led us to the hypothesis that the individual phenotypic diversity of a taxon is dependent on the community composition.

Summary: The development of effective management strategies to reduce the occurrence of diseases in aquaculture is hampered by the limited knowledge on the microbial ecology of these systems. In this study, the dynamics and dominant community assembly processes in the rearing water of Litopenaeus vannamei larviculture tanks were determined. Additionally, the contribution of peripheral microbiomes, such as those of live and dry feeds, to the rearing water microbiome were quantified. The community assembly in the hatchery rearing water over time was dominated by stochasticity, which explains the observed heterogeneity between replicate cultivations. The community undergoes two shifts that match with the dynamics of the algal abundances in the rearing water. Source tracking analysis revealed that 37% of all bacteria in the hatchery rearing water were introduced either by the live or dry feeds, or during water exchanges. The contribution of the microbiome from the algae was the largest, followed by that of the Artemia , the exchange water and the dry feeds. Our findings provide fundamental knowledge on the assembly processes and dynamics of rearing water microbiomes and illustrate the crucial role of these peripheral microbiomes in maintaining health‐promoting rearing water microbiomes.

Monitoring of microbial community composition is crucial for both microbiome management research and applications. Existing technologies, such as plating and amplicon sequencing, can become laborious and expensive when high-throughput measurements are required.

With the increasing demand for global food resources, improving aquaculture production has been the focus for years. Tilapia has become one of the most commonly farmed and economically important fish species globally. Research efforts have recognized the significant roles that microbial communities play in improving the health and aquaculture performance of tilapia. However, interactions between tilapia and its associated microbial communities remain poorly understood. In this review, the current understanding of tilapia microbiomes is summarized. With fish being in intimate relationship with its environment, studies characterizing the microbial communities present in the rearing environment and how they affect tilapia microbiomes and health are also examined. Having an in‐depth understanding of the different microbiomes and their roles and interactions in the tilapia culture system is a crucial step toward managing and modulating these microbial communities to improve tilapia health. This review also sheds light on the different factors that influence tilapia microbiomes such as developmental stages, organ tissues, and types of culture systems. The effects of on‐farm practices such as diet; feeding regimes; use of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics; vaccination; application of antibiotics; disinfection; and pond fertilization on tilapia microbiome are also discussed. Through this review, future research needs are identified that can provide a deeper understanding of the relationships among tilapia microbiomes, health, and productivity. These knowledge in turn can be harnessed into practical applications and potential microbiome‐based management protocols to improve future best management practices for tilapia aquaculture.

Background: Prebiotics are selectively used by host microorganisms to promote health. Because effective prebiotic doses (1.5–30 g/day) often require inconvenient delivery formats, this study aims to explore whether capsule-compatible doses of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) can effectively modulate the gut microbiome. Methods: The impact of Bimuno^® GOS (Reading, UK) at 0.5, 0.75, 1.83, and 3.65 g on the adult gut microbiome was assessed using the ex vivo SIFR^® technology (n = 8), a clinically validated, bioreactor-based technology. Results: The GOS were rapidly fermented and significantly increased beneficial Bifidobacterium species (B. adolescentis, B. bifidum, and B. longum), even at the lowest tested dose. In doing so, GOS strongly promoted SCFA production, particularly acetate (significant from 0.5 g) and butyrate (significant from 0.75 g). Gas production only mildly increased, likely as Bifidobacterium species do not produce gases. Based on the ability of the SIFR^® technology to cultivate strictly anaerobic, hard-to-culture gut microbes, unlike in past in vitro studies, we elucidated that GOS also enriched specific Lachnospiraceae species. Besides Anaerobutyricum hallii, this included Bariatricus comes, Blautia species (B. massiliensis, Blautia_A, B. faecis), Oliverpabstia intestinalis, Mediterraneibacter faecis, and Fusicatenibacter species. Finally, GOS also promoted propionate (significant from 0.75 g), linked to increases in Phocaeicola vulgatus. Conclusions: GOS displayed prebiotic potential at capsule-compatible doses, offering greater flexibility in nutritional product formulation and consumer convenience. Notably, the strong response at the lowest dose suggests effective microbiome modulation at lower levels than previously expected.

Investigating phenotypic heterogeneity can help to better understand and manage microbial communities. However, characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity remains a challenge, as there is no standardized analysis framework. Several optical tools are available, which often describe properties of the individual cell. In this work, we compare Raman spectroscopy and flow cytometry to study phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial populations. The growth phase of E. coli populations was characterized using both technologies. Our findings show that flow cytometry detects and quantifies shifts in phenotypic heterogeneity at the population level due to its high-throughput nature. Raman spectroscopy, on the other hand, offers a much higher resolution at the single-cell level (i.e. more biochemical information is recorded). Therefore, it is capable of identifying distinct phenotypic populations when coupled with standardized data analysis. In addition, it provides information about biomolecules that are present, which can be linked to cell functionality. We propose an automated workflow to distinguish between bacterial phenotypic populations using Raman spectroscopy and validated this approach with an external dataset. We recommend to apply flow cytometry to characterize phenotypic heterogeneity at the population level, and Raman spectroscopy to perform a more in-depth analysis of heterogeneity at the single-cell level. Importance: Single-cell techniques are frequently applied tools to study phenotypic characteristics of bacterial populations. As flow cytometry and Raman spectroscopy gain popularity in the field, there is a need to understand their advantages and limitations, as well as to create a more standardized data analysis framework. Our work shows that flow cytometry allows to study and quantify shifts at the bacterial population level, but since its resolution is limited for microbial purposes, distinct phenotypic populations cannot be distinguished at the single-cell level. Raman spectroscopy, combined with appropriate data analysis, has sufficient resolving power at the single-cell level, enabling the identification of distinct phenotypic populations. As regions in a Raman spectrum are associated with specific (bio)molecules, it is possible to link these to the cell state and/or its function.