A cytokine storm conceivably contributes to manifestations of corona virus disease (COVID-19). Inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) cause acute liver injury while serum detectability indicates systemic inflammation. We explored a link between systemic IL-6, related acute phase proteins and liver injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. 655 patients with suspected COVID-19 were screened in the emergency department at the University Hospital of Innsbruck, Austria, between February and April 2020. 96 patients (∼15%) were hospitalized with COVID-19. 15 patients required intensive-care treatment (ICT). Plasma aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and gamma glutamyl transferase, as well as IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined by standard clinical assays. Of all hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 41 (42%) showed elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentration. COVID-19 patients with elevated AST exhibited significantly higher IL-6 (p < 0.001), ferritin (p < 0.001), LDH (p < 0.001) and CRP (p < 0.05) serum concentrations compared to patients with normal AST. Liver injury correlated with systemic IL-6 (p < 0.001), CRP (p < 0.001), ferritin (p < 0.001) and LDH (p < 0.001) concentration. In COVID-19 patients requiring ICT, correlations were more pronounced. Systemic inflammation could be a fuel for hepatic injury in COVID-19.

Study Objective:Application of high concentrations of oxygen to increase oxygen partial pressure (pO2) is the most important treatment for patients with carbon monoxide intoxication or divers with suspected decompression illness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oxygenation performance of various non-invasive oxygen systems.Methods:The effect of different oxygen systems on arterial pO2, pCO2 and pH and their subjective comfort was evaluated in 30 healthy participants. Eight devices were included: nasal cannula, non-rebreather mask, AirLife Open mask, Flow-Safe II CPAP device, SuperNO₂VA nasal PAP device, all operated with 15 L/min constant flow oxygen; nasal high-flow (50 L/min flow, 1.0 FiO2), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV, 12 PEEP, 4 ASB, 1.0 FiO2) and a standard diving regulator (operated with pure oxygen).Results:Diving regulator, SuperNO₂VA, nasal high-flow and NPPV achieved mean arterial pO2 concentrations between 538 and 556 mm Hg within 5 minutes. The AirLife Open mask, the nasal cannula and the non-rebreather mask achieved concentrations of 348–451 mm Hg and the Flow-Safe II device 270 mm Hg. Except for the AirLife open mask, pCO2 decreased and pH increased with all devices. The highest pH values were observed with NPPV, diving regulator, Flow-Safe II and nasal high-flow but apparent hyperventilation was uncommon. The AirLife Open and the non-rebreather mask were the most comfortable, the SuperNO₂VA and the nasal cannula the most uncomfortable devices.Conclusion:A standard diving regulator and the SuperNO₂VA device were equally effective in providing highest physiologically possible pO2 as compared to nasal high-flow and NPPV.

Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) is an exaggerated response to carotid sinus baroreceptor stimulation, which may result in hypotension, prolonged asystole, and subsequently transient loss of consciousness due to cerebral hypoperfusion. However, this commonly benign syndrome may have lethal consequences under certain circumstances such as scuba diving. We report the case of a trained 73-year-old male diver, who survived an almost fatal diving accident without any neurological deficits due to cardiac arrest under water. After recovery and intensive diagnostics in the local hospital, the origin of cardiac arrest remained unclear. However, after referral to our tertiary care centre CSS could be diagnosed by provoking syncope and asystole with carotid sinus massage (CSM). Consequently, a leadless pacing system was implanted and his medical diving fitness could then be recertified. In conclusion, CSS may be an underdiagnosed cause of loss of consciousness. Thus, screening for CSS by CSM should be included in medical exams in senior athletes and specifically in senior divers.

Background: There is conflicting data about which ventilation strategy is better when performing external chest compressions with mechanical devices. During manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, continuous ventilation is recommended when the airway is secured and a ventilation rate of 10/min is maintained. However, during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, some expert groups and various data have raised concerns about ineffective ventilation with continuous ventilation due to the high intrathoracic pressure generated by the devices without pauses for effective ventilation. This study compares the two possible ventilation strategies - continuous ventilation and 30:2 (30 compressions followed by 2 ventilations) - during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We analysed the effects of the two resuscitation strategies on ventilatory parameters measured during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and compared mechanical with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation with both ventilation strategies. Methods: 30 students of human medicine performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on endotracheally intubated resuscitation training manikins. The chest compressions were performed manually or by using mechanical chest compression devices (LUCAS ^® , EASY PULSE ^® ). Tidal volume, respiratory minute ventilation volume, ventilation frequency, compression frequency, and chest compression depth were recorded by sensors built into the manikins. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed with either continuous ventilation (ventilations every 6 s; 10/min) or 30:2 in two resuscitation runs of 3 min each. Results: Respiratory minute ventilation volume was significantly higher with continuous ventilation than with 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (4.8 l/min vs. 3.1 l/min, p <.001). Tidal volume was lower with continuous ventilation than with a 30:2 cardiopulmonary resuscitation (521 ml vs. 565 ml; p = .013). There were no significant differences between manual and mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation with both ventilation strategies. Conclusion: This study showed that ventilation during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation using mechanical chest compression devices was efficient with both ventilation strategies. Interestingly, the respiratory minute ventilation volume was even higher with continuous ventilation than with 30:2 due to the higher respiratory rate. In addition, there was no significant difference in ventilation outcome between manual and mechanical chest compressions.

At the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, devastating incidents increased due to frequent oxygen administration to patients. The dangers associated with the use of oxygen, especially through local enrichments and formation of “oxygen clouds”, have been well understood for years. Nevertheless, dramatic incidents continue to occur, since fire hazard increases exponentially with oxygen concentrations above 23%. Rescue helicopters are at a particular high risk, because of technical reasons such as oxygen use in a very small space, surrounded by kerosene lines, electronic relays and extremely hot surfaces. In this study three different sized rescue helicopter models (Airbus H135, H145 and MD902) were examined. Oxygen enrichment in the cabin was measured with an oxymeter during a delivery rate of 15 l/min constant flow for 60 min. Furthermore, the clearance of the enriched atmosphere was tested in different situations and with different ventilation methods. To make the airflow visible, a fog machine was used to fill the helicopter cabin. Oxygen accumulation above 21% was detected in every helicopter. After 10–15 min, the critical 23% threshold was exceeded in all three aircrafts. The highest concentration was detected in the smallest machine (MD902) after 60 min with 27.4%. Moreover, oxygen clouds persisted in the rear and the bottom of the aircrafts, even when the front doors were opened. This was most pronounced in the largest aircraft, the H145 from Airbus Helicopters. Complete and rapid removal of elevated oxygen concentrations was achieved only by cross-ventilation within 1 min. Oxygen should be handled with particular care in rescue helicopters. Adapted checklists and precautions can help to prevent oxygen accumulation, and thus, fatal incidents. To our knowledge, this is the first study, which analyzed oxygen concentrations in different settings in rescue helicopters.