Background: Cervical alignment is vital for maintaining horizontal gaze and sagittal balance. The aims of this study were to summarize previously published descriptions of normative cervical alignment and to analyze a cohort of asymptomatic volunteers in order to identify natural clusters of normal radiographic parameters. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature on radiographic measurements of asymptomatic volunteers through a search of MEDLINE and ScienceDirect databases. We then performed an analysis of demographic and radiographic parameters of volunteers without back or neck complaints. Only subjects with a chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) within previously published normal limits were retained for analysis. A 2-step cluster analysis was used to find natural groups of cervical alignment. Differences among groups were investigated with a post hoc analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: We included 37 articles in our analysis. There was a broad spectrum of both C2-C7 lordosis-kyphosis and T1 slope across ages and sexes. Of the 119 asymptomatic volunteers who were available for analysis, 84 (with a mean age [and standard deviation] of 49.0 ± 17.1 years) had a CBVA ranging from −4.7° to 17.7°. The cluster analysis identified 3 alignment groups based on cervical lordosis-kyphosis and T1 slope (silhouette measure of cohesion, >0.6). Twenty-seven volunteers (32.1%) were identified as the “kyphotic curve cohort” (KCC) (mean C2-C7 Cobb angle, −8.6° ± 7.3°; mean T1 slope, 17.4° ± 6.6°), 43 volunteers (51.2%) were identified as the “medium lordosis cohort” (MLC) (mean C2-C7 Cobb angle, 8.7° ± 7.2°; mean T1 slope, 26.6° ± 4.0°), and 14 volunteers (16.7%) were identified as the “large lordosis cohort” (LLC) (mean C2-C7 Cobb angle, 21.2° ± 7.2°, mean T1 slope, 39.5° ± 6.4°) (p < 0.001 for both). Moving from KCC to LLC, there was a significant decrease in C0-C2 lordosis (p = 0.016). Examination of the cervical vertebral orientation demonstrated that C4 had a constant orientation relative to the horizontal (p = 0.665). Correlation analysis between C2-C7 and vertebral orientations again demonstrated that C4 orientation was independent of C2-C7 alignment. Conclusions: We have identified 3 morphotypes of the cervical spine based on C2-C7 alignment and T1 slope. These findings demonstrate the broad definition of normal cervical alignment and the range of cervical lordosis-kyphosis that is acceptable.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. Methods: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. Results: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. Conclusions: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT.

Study Design: Retrospective single-center study. Objective: Investigate the effect of posterior instrumentation on the relationship between lordosis and kyphosis. Methods: Surgically treated patients with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were analyzed. Asymptomatic volunteers served to show the normal anatomical relationship between thoracic and lumbar curves. Patients were stratified based on postoperative instrumentation: “Thoracic Fusion” = complete fusion of thoracic spine; “Lumbar Fusion” = complete fusion of lumbar spine; and “Complete Fusion” = fusion from sacrum to at least T5. Bivariate correlations and regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between change in thoracic kyphosis (ΔTK) and change in spinopelvic mismatch (ΔPI-LL; pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis) before and after fusion. Analyses were repeated in “Lumbar Fusion” patients with flexible preoperative thoracic spines. Results: For asymptomatic volunteers, the natural anatomical relationship between TK and LL was found to be TK = 41% of LL ( r = 0.425, P < .001). A total of 153 of 167 adult spinal deformity patients were included (62 years old, 26.7 kg/m², 78% female). Mean follow-up was 11.5 ± 6.8 months. “Thoracic Fusion” group showed no alteration in the natural relationship between TK and LL (ΔTK = 39% ΔPI-LL), whereas “Lumbar Fusion” group had a reduction in reciprocal change (ΔTK = 34% ΔPI-LL) although a subanalysis of patients in the “Lumbar Fusion” group with flexible thoracic spines showed a marked compensation in reciprocal change with (ΔTK = 58% ΔPI-LL). Conclusion: The relationship between ΔTK and ΔPI-LL is dependent on level instrumented. “Thoracic Fusion” drives change in LL while this relationship is affected by TK’s natural stiffness in “Lumbar Fusion” patients.