Susan M. Hiniker

Dr. Susan M. Hiniker

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHSusan M. Hiniker
Susan M. Hiniker
DCDaniel S. Chen
Daniel S. Chen
SRSunil Reddy
Sunil Reddy
DCDaniel T. Chang
Daniel T. Chang
Jennifer JonesJennifer Jones
Jennifer Jones
SKSusan J. Knox
Susan J. Knox
Melanoma is a relatively immunogenic tumor, in which infiltration of melanoma cells by T lymphocytes is associated with a better clinical prognosis. We hypothesized that radiation-induced cell death may provide additional stimulation of an anti-tumor immune response in the setting of anti-CTLA-4 treatment. In a pilot melanoma patient, we prospectively tested this hypothesis. We treated the patient with two cycles of ipilimumab, followed by stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to two of seven hepatic metastases, and two additional cycles of ipilimumab. Subsequent positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan indicated that all metastases, including unirradiated liver lesions and an unirradiated axillary lesion, had completely resolved, consistent with a complete response by RECIST. The use of radiotherapy in combination with targeted immunotherapy as a noninvasive in vivo tumor vaccine strategy appears to be a promising method of enhancing the induction of systemic immune responses and anti-tumor effect.

1 November 2016 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSusan M. Hiniker
Susan M. Hiniker
SRSunil A. Reddy
Sunil A. Reddy
HMHolden T. Maecker
Holden T. Maecker
PSPriyanka B. Subrahmanyam
Priyanka B. Subrahmanyam
YRYael Rosenberg-Hasson
Yael Rosenberg-Hasson
SKSusan J. Knox
Susan J. Knox

24 May 2012 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHSusan M. Hiniker
Susan M. Hiniker
DCDaniel S Chen
Daniel S Chen
SKSusan J Knox
Susan J Knox
Postow et al. (March 8 issue)1 report an abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma treated with ipilimumab and radiotherapy, with a response in nonirradiated lesions.

1 August 2012 in Neoplasia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAarif Ahsan
Aarif Ahsan
SRSusmita G. Ramanand
Susmita G. Ramanand
CWChristopher Whitehead
Christopher Whitehead
SHSusan M. Hiniker
Susan M. Hiniker
ARAlnawaz Rehemtulla
Alnawaz Rehemtulla
MNMukesh K Nyati
Mukesh K Nyati
Neoplasia publishes the results of novel investigations in all areas of oncology research.

31 March 2010 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAarif Ahsan
Aarif Ahsan
SHSusan M. Hiniker
Susan M. Hiniker
SRSusmita G. Ramanand
Susmita G. Ramanand
SNShyam Nyati
Shyam Nyati
AHAshok Hegde
Ashok Hegde
MNMukesh K. Nyati
Mukesh K. Nyati
Cisplatin and its analogues are the most commonly used agents in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, we investigated a possible role of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation and degradation in cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. Cisplatin treatment led to an increase in initial EGFR phosphorylation at Y1045, the binding site of ubiquitin ligase, Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (c-Cbl), followed by ubiquitination in the relatively cisplatin-sensitive cell lines. However, cisplatin-resistant cell lines underwent minimal EGFR phosphorylation at the Y1045 site and minimal ubiquitination. We found that EGFR degradation in response to cisplatin was highly correlated with cytotoxicity in seven head and neck cancer cell lines. Pretreatment with EGF enhanced cisplatin-induced EGFR degradation and cytotoxicity, whereas erlotinib pretreatment blocked EGFR phosphorylation, degradation, and cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity. Expression of a mutant Y1045F EGFR, which is relatively resistant to c-Cbl–mediated degradation, in Chinese hamster ovary cells and the UMSCC11B human head and neck cancer cell line protected EGFR from cisplatin-induced degradation and enhanced cell survival compared with wild-type (WT) EGFR. Transfection of WT c-Cbl enhanced EGFR degradation and cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity compared with control vector. These results show that cisplatin-induced EGFR phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination and degradation is an important determinant of cisplatin sensitivity. Our findings suggest that treatment with an EGFR inhibitor before cisplatin would be antagonistic, as EGFR inhibition would protect EGFR from cisplatin-mediated phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination and degradation, which may explain the negative results of several recent clinical trials. Furthermore, they suggest that EGFR degradation is worth exploring as an early biomarker of response and as a target to improve outcome. Cancer Res; 70(7); 2862–9

1 November 2013 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSusan M. Hiniker
Susan M. Hiniker
ARAudrey Roux
Audrey Roux
JMJames D. Murphy
James D. Murphy
JHJeremy P. Harris
Jeremy P. Harris
PTPhuoc Tran
Phuoc Tran
EKElizabeth A. Kidd
Elizabeth A. Kidd