Zhenhui Yi

Dr. Zhenhui Yi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 September 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWei Chen
Wei Chen
JCJie Chen
Jie Chen
JSJian Shi
Jian Shi
SZSuyun Zhang
Suyun Zhang
WZWenjing Zhang
Wenjing Zhang
ZZZhicheng Zhang
Zhicheng Zhang
Wave-induced mixing can enhance vertical mixing in the upper ocean, facilitating the exchange of heat and momentum between the surface and deeper layers, thereby influencing ocean circulation and climate patterns. Building on previous research, this study proposes a wave-induced mixing parameterization scheme (referred to as EXP3) specifically designed for typhoon periods. This scheme was integrated into the fully coupled ocean–wave–atmosphere model COAWST and applied to analyze Typhoon In-Fa (2021) as a case study. The simulation results were validated against publicly available data, demonstrating a good overall match with observed phenomena. Subsequently, a comparative analysis was conducted between the EXP3 scheme, the previous scheme (EXP2) and the original model scheme (EXP1). Validation against Argo and Drifter buoy data revealed that both EXP2 and EXP3, which include wave-induced mixing effects, resulted in a decrease in the simulated mixed layer depth (MLD) and mixed layer temperature (MLT), with EXP3 showing closer alignment with the observed data. Compared to the other two experiments, EXP3 enhanced vertical motion in the ocean due to intensified wave-induced mixing, leading to increased upper-layer water divergence and upwelling, a decrease in sea surface temperature and accelerated rightward deflection of surface currents. This phenomenon not only altered the temperature structure of the ocean surface layer but also significantly impacted the regional ocean dynamics.

23 September 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCCao Cao
Cao Cao
JCJie Chen
Jie Chen
JSJian Shi
Jian Shi
JXJingmin Xia
Jingmin Xia
WZWenjing Zhang
Wenjing Zhang
QWQianhui Wang
Qianhui Wang
The study of upper ocean mixing processes, including their dynamics and thermodynamics, has been a primary focus for oceanographers and meteorologists. Wave breaking in deep water is believed to play a significant role in these processes, affecting air–sea interactions and contributing to the energy dissipation of surface waves. This, in turn, enhances the transfer of gas, heat, and mass at the ocean surface. In this paper, we use the FVCOM-SWAVE coupled wave and current model, which is based on the MY-2.5 turbulent closure model, to examine the response of upper ocean turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and temperature to various wave breaking parametric schemes. We propose a new parametric scheme for wave breaking energy at the sea surface, which is based on the correlation between breaking wave parameter RB and whitecap coverage. The impact of this new wave breaking parametric scheme on the upper ocean under typhoon conditions is analyzed by comparing it with the original parametric scheme that is primarily influenced by wave age. The wave field simulated by SWAVE was verified using Jason-3 satellite altimeter data, confirming the effectiveness of the simulation. The simulation results for upper ocean temperature were also validated using OISST data and Argo float observational data. Our findings indicate that, under the influence of Typhoon Nanmadol, both parametric schemes can transfer the energy of sea surface wave breaking into the seawater. The new wave breaking parameter RB scheme effectively enhances turbulent mixing at the ocean surface, leading to a decrease in sea surface temperature (SST) and an increase in mixed layer depth (MLD). This further improves upon the issue of uneven mixing of seawater at the air–sea interface in the MY-2.5 turbulent closure model. However, it is important to note that wave breaking under typhoon conditions is only one aspect of wave impact on ocean disturbances. Therefore, further research is needed to fully understand the impact of waves on upper ocean mixing, including the consideration of other wave mechanisms.

12 September 2025 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShiyan Li
Shiyan Li
ZYZhenhui Yi
Zhenhui Yi
QSQiwei SUN
Qiwei SUN
HWHanshi Wang
Hanshi Wang
XGXiang Gao
Xiang Gao
JWJie Wu
Jie Wu
Salinity extremes (SEs) play a crucial role in marine ecosystems, ocean circulation, and climate variability. Understanding their distribution and drivers is essential for predicting changes in ocean salinity under climate change, particularly in dynamic regions such as the Hawaiian Islands, where mesoscale eddies significantly modulate water mass properties. This study investigates the three-dimensional characteristics of SEs and their responses to mesoscale eddies using mooring observations and sea surface salinity data. We find that high salinity extremes (HSEs) generally occur more frequently than low salinity extremes (LSEs) in the study region, though LSEs exhibit greater duration and intensity. Mesoscale eddies modulate SEs significantly—anticyclonic eddies (AEs) enhance LSEs, whereas cyclonic eddies (CEs) promote HSEs in the upper layer. This relationship reverses in the deeper layer, with AEs favoring HSEs and CEs enhancing LSEs. These opposing effects are driven by a vertical displacement of the subsurface salinity maximum layer, where CEs lift high-salinity subsurface water to the upper ocean via upwelling, creating HSEs in the upper layer and LSEs in the deeper layer, while AEs subduct high-salinity water downward, reducing upper-layer salinity (LSEs) but increasing deeper-layer salinity (HSEs) via downwelling. Spatially, CEs exhibit a single-core high-salinity anomaly, displaced westward by 0.3 times of the eddy radius from the eddy center, with HSEs peaking in frequency and intensity near the core. In contrast, AEs display a dipole salinity anomaly (low northwest/high southeast), aligning with LSE frequency distribution, while HSEs show an inverse pattern. Mooring data further reveal that AE-LSE co-occurrence is highest within 1.2 times of the eddy radius, whereas CE-HSE probability declines with eddy intensity. Notably, AE-HSE and CE-LSE probabilities, though initially weaker, surpass AE-LSE and CE-HSE at certain depths, underlining the complexity of depth-dependent eddy modulation. These findings may advance understanding of ocean salinity dynamics and provide insights into how mesoscale processes modulate extreme events, with implications for marine biogeochemistry and climate modeling.

5 November 2025 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHanshi Wang
Hanshi Wang
ZYZhenhui Yi
Zhenhui Yi
RDRuibin Ding
Ruibin Ding
HZHua Zheng
Hua Zheng
JSJian Shi
Jian Shi
HHHuaming Huang
Huaming Huang

1 March 2026 in Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
SLShun Liang
Shun Liang
SLShiyan Li
Shiyan Li
CWChengyi Wu
Chengyi Wu
ZWZhili Wang
Zhili Wang
HCHaoxiang Cao
Haoxiang Cao
ZYZhenhui Yi
Zhenhui Yi
This study uses 30 years (1993–2023) of data from the Global Ocean Reanalysis (GLORYS) and applies the Vector Geometry (V-G) method to detect and reconstruct the 3D characteristics of mesoscale eddies in the South China Sea (SCS; 5°N–25°N, 105°E–125°E). We analyze their spatial distribution, shape, radius, duration, depth, and other properties, and select a typical anticyclonic eddy (AE) for case analysis. The main conclusions are as follows: The number of mesoscale eddies peaks at approximately 25 m depth. AEs dominate above 20 m, whereas cyclonic eddies (CEs) are more prevalent below 20 m. The average eddy radius ranges between 35 and 40 km in the upper 100 m; below 100 m down to 700 m, the radius of CEs is significantly larger than that of AEs. The average eddy duration varies with depth, with AEs generally lasting longer than CEs—reaching a maximum difference of 53 days at around 220 m. Horizontally, Layer 14 (25.21 m), identified as the core activity layer, contains the highest number of eddies (2,649). Eddies are concentrated west of the Luzon Strait and in the central SCS. AEs have a larger average radius in the western basin than in the eastern region. Deep eddies exhibit longer durations and form two prominent clusters centered at 19°–21°N, 116°–119°E and 13°–16°N, 115°–117°E. Case analysis of a typical AE west of the Luzon Strait shows that its shape evolved from quasi-triangular to circular and finally to elliptical. Its vertical structure transitioned from bowl-shaped to cone-shaped and back to bowl-shaped. The maximum radius reached 44 km during the mature phase. Simultaneously, the thermocline deepened by 70 m, and a positive temperature anomaly of up to +2.5°C occurred within the 0–200 m layer. Salinity anomalies showed a double-positive structure (0–50 m and 75–230 m) with a negative anomaly at 50–75 m. This study investigates the 3D characteristics and evolution of mesoscale eddies in the SCS, which could enhance the understanding of dynamic processes and thermohaline effects, and provide insights for improving regional ocean modeling.