Classification of pneumonia in animals has been controversial, and the most problematic pattern is interstitial pneumonia. This is true from the gross and histologic perspectives, and also from a mechanistic point of view. Multiple infectious and noninfectious diseases are associated with interstitial pneumonia, all of them converging in the release of inflammatory mediators that generate local damage and attract inflammatory cells that inevitably trigger a second wave of damage. Diffuse alveolar damage is one of the more frequently identified histologic types of interstitial pneumonia and involves injury to alveolar epithelial and/or endothelial cells, with 3 distinct stages. The first is the “exudative” stage, with alveolar edema and hyaline membranes. The second is the “proliferative” stage, with hyperplasia and reactive atypia of type II pneumocytes, infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages in the interstitium and early proliferation of fibroblasts. These stages are reversible and often nonfatal. If damage persists, there is a third “fibrosing” stage, characterized by fibrosis of the interstitium due to proliferation of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts, persistence of type II pneumocytes, segments of squamous metaplasia of alveolar epithelium, plus inflammation. Understanding the lesion patterns associated with interstitial pneumonias, their causes, and the underlying mechanisms aid in accurate diagnosis that involves an interdisciplinary collaborative approach involving pathologists, clinicians, and radiologists.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is a common malignant skin cancer with a significant impact on health, and it is important to determine the degree of reliance of CSCC on angiogenesis for growth and metastasis. Major regulators of angiogenesis are the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and their associated receptors. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing produces multiple isoforms of VEGF-A and PLGF with distinct biological properties. Several studies highlight the function of VEGF-A in CSCC, but there are no studies of the different isoforms of VEGF-A and PLGF for this neoplasm. We characterized the expression of three isoforms of VEGF-A, two isoforms of PLGF, and their receptors in cat CSCC biopsies compared to normal haired skin (NHS). Although our results revealed no significant changes in transcript levels of panVEGF-A or their isoforms, the mRNA levels of PLGF I and the receptors Flt-1 and KDR were downregulated in CSCC compared to NHS. Differences were observed in ligand:receptor mRNA expression ratio, with the expression of VEGF-A relative to its receptor KDR higher in CSCC, which is consistent with our hypothesis and prior human SCC studies. Immunolocalization in tissue showed increased expression of all measured factors and receptors in tumor cells compared to NHS and surrounding vasculature. We conclude that the factors measured may play a pivotal role in CSCC growth, although further studies are needed to clarify the role of angiogenic factors in feline CSCC.

Canine soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are common neoplasms and considered immune deserts. Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes are sparse in STS and, when present, tend to organize around blood vessels or at the periphery of the neoplasm. This pattern is associated with an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment linked to overexpression of molecules of the PD‐axis. PD‐1, PD‐L1 and PD‐L2 expression correlates with malignancy and poor prognosis in other neoplasms in humans and dogs, but little is known about their role in canine STS, their relationship to tumour grade, and how different therapies affect expression. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expression of checkpoint molecules across STS tumour grades and after tumour ablation treatment. Gene expression analysis was performed by reverse‐transcriptase real‐time quantitative PCR in soft tissue sarcomas that underwent histotripsy and from histologic specimens of STS from the Virginia Tech Animal Laboratory Services archives. The expression of PD‐1, PD‐L1 and PD‐L2 was detected in untreated STS tissue representing grades 1, 2, and 3. Numerically decreased expression of all markers was observed in tissue sampled from the treatment interface relative to untreated areas of the tumour. The relatively lower expression of these checkpoint molecules at the periphery of the treated area may be related to liquefactive necrosis induced by the histotripsy treatment, and would potentially allow TILs to infiltrate the tumour. Relative increases of these checkpoint molecules in tumours of a higher grade and alongside immune cell infiltration are consistent with previous reports that associate their expression with malignancy.

A 10-y-old American Paint Horse mare was presented to the Equine Field Services at Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (Blacksburg, VA, USA) for evaluation of mastitis and a possible abscess in the right mamma. Histologic evaluation of a mammary biopsy revealed a densely cellular, infiltrative neoplasm with cells arranged in packets supported by thin stroma. In a neuroendocrine immunohistochemistry panel, the neoplastic cells did not immunolabel for neuron-specific enolase or synaptophysin, positively immunolabeled for chromogranin A, and had moderate scattered immunolabeling for S100. These findings confirmed a diagnosis of mammary neuroendocrine tumor. Although the cells also did not immunolabel for cytokeratin, we cannot rule out a neuroendocrine carcinoma. Neuroendocrine mammary neoplasms are very rare and, to our knowledge, they have not been reported previously in horses. This neoplasm should be considered as a differential diagnosis for mammary tumors in mares.

Background: The minimized pan-coronavirus (CoV) vaccine-1 developed by our laboratory contained pDNA sequences of feline coronavirus serotype-1 (FCoV1) and SARS-CoV2 (SCoV2) spike B-cell epitopes plus FCoV/SCoV2-conserved, CoV-specific polymerase cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes formulated in lipid nanoparticle (LNP). Only FCoV2 infects feline cell lines needed for developing native challenge inoculum that causes feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). Hence, Pilot Study 1 evaluated the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the pan-CoV vaccine-1 in feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)-infected cats, with or without FCoV1 coinfection. Pilot Study 2 evaluated the cross-protective effect of pan-CoV vaccines in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) cats against intranasal challenge with FIP virus serotype 2 (FIPV2). Methods: In Study 1, we vaccinated two FIV-infected cats (one negative and another positive for FCoV1 coinfection) intramuscularly twice with CTL epitopes-LNP vaccine and later twice with pan-CoV vaccine-1. Controls included two unvaccinated FIV-infected cats with or without FCoV1 coinfection. Study 2 assessed the sequential vaccinations of three pan-CoV vaccines in four SPF cats. The first two vaccinations were with pan-CoV vaccine-2, followed by pan-CoV vaccine-3 (twice), and lastly with pan-CoV vaccine-1 (once). Three SPF controls included two cats immunized with LNP and one lacking any immunization. Pan-CoV vaccine-2 contained pDNAs with modified FCoV1/SCoV2 B-cell epitopes plus CTL epitopes in LNP. Pan-CoV vaccine-3 contained only pDNAs with FCoV1 B-cell epitopes plus CTL epitopes in LNP. Results: Study 1 demonstrated no adverse effect with 25 μg and 50 μg CTL epitopes-LNP vaccine and 50 μg pan-CoV vaccine-1. However, 100 μg pan-CoV vaccine-1 caused fever 24 h later, which was resolved by a single Meloxicam treatment. Both vaccinees developed cross-FCoV2 neutralizing antibodies (XNAbs), immunoblot binding antibodies (bAbs) to FCoV1 receptor-binding domain (RBD), and T-cell responses to FCoV1 RBD, whereas one vaccinee also developed bAbs to SCoV2 RBD. Study 2 demonstrated no adverse effects after each vaccination. Three vaccinees developed low-titer XNAbs and bAbs to FCoV2 spike-2 by the fourth vaccination. Upon challenge, all cats developed FCoV2 NAbs and bAbs to FCoV2 nucleocapsid and RBD. High vaccine-induced T-cell responses to FCoV1 RBD and T-cell mitogen responses declined with an increase in responses to FCoV2 RBD at three weeks post-challenge. Two of the three controls died from FIP, whereas one vaccinee, with the lowest vaccine-induced immunity, died from skin vasculitis lesions and detection of FIPV2 infection by semi-nested RT-snPCR in feces. Conclusions: In Pilot Study 1, the pan-CoV vaccine-LNP dose of 50 μg had no adverse effects, but adverse effects were observed at 100 μg dose. In Pilot Study 2, the FCoV1-based B-cell vaccine(s) induced low levels of XNAbs against FIPV2 and delayed challenge infection against high-dose FIPV2. The high-dose FIPV2 infections in the vaccinated and control cats started to clear, by single housing at 23–26 weeks post-challenge, whereas two cats in Pilot Study 1 cleared natural FCoV1 transmission by 26 weeks post-infection.