Tom Farrow

Dr. Tom Farrow

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2001 in NeuroReport
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSean A. Spence
Sean A. Spence
TFTom Farrow
Tom Farrow
AHAmy E. Herford
Amy E. Herford
IWIain D. Wilkinson
Iain D. Wilkinson
YZYing Zheng
Ying Zheng
PWPeter W. R. Woodruff
Peter W. R. Woodruff
Brain activity in humans telling lies has yet to be elucidated. We developed an objective approach to its investigation, utilizing a computer-based interrogation and fMRI. Interrogatory questions probed recent episodic memory in 30 volunteers studied outside and 10 volunteers studied inside the MR scanner. In a counter-balanced design subjects answered specified questions both truthfully and with lies. Lying was associated with longer response times (p < 0.001) and greater activity in bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortices (p < 0.05, corrected). These findings were replicated using an alternative protocol. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex may be engaged in generating lies or withholding the truth.

15 March 2012 in Bipolar Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSudhakar Selvaraj
Sudhakar Selvaraj
Danilo ArnoneDanilo Arnone
Danilo Arnone
DJDominic Job
Dominic Job
ASAndrew Stanfield
Andrew Stanfield
TFTom Farrow
Tom Farrow
AMAndrew M McIntosh
Andrew M McIntosh

1 August 2001 in NeuroReport
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTom Farrow
Tom Farrow
YZYing Zheng
Ying Zheng
IWIain D. Wilkinson
Iain D. Wilkinson
SSSean A. Spence
Sean A. Spence
JDJ. F. William Deakin
J. F. William Deakin
PWPeter W. R. Woodruff
Peter W. R. Woodruff
Previous functional brain imaging studies suggest that the ability to infer the intentions and mental states of others (social cognition) is mediated by medial prefrontal cortex. Little is known about the anatomy of empathy and forgiveness. We used functional MRI to detect brain regions engaged by judging others’ emotional states and the forgivability of their crimes. Ten volunteers read and made judgements based on social scenarios and a high level baseline task (social reasoning). Both empathic and forgivability judgements activated left superior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal gyrus and precuneus. Empathic judgements also activated left anterior middle temporal and left inferior frontal gyri, while forgivability judgements activated posterior cingulate gyrus. Empathic and forgivability judgements activate specific regions of the human brain, which we propose contribute to social cohesion.

29 November 2004 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSean A Spence
Sean A Spence
MHMike D Hunter
Mike D Hunter
TFTom Farrow
Tom Farrow
RGRussell D Green
Russell D Green
DLDavid H Leung
David H Leung
VGVenkatasubramanian Ganesan
Venkatasubramanian Ganesan
An organism may use misinformation, knowingly (through deception) or unknowingly (as in the case of camouflage), to gain advantage in a competitive environment. From an evolutionary perspective, greater tactical deception occurs among primates closer to humans, with larger neocortices. In humans, the onset of deceptive behaviours in childhood exhibits a developmental trajectory, which may be regarded as ‘normal’ in the majority and deficient among a minority with certain neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. autism). In the human adult, deception and lying exhibit features consistent with their use of ‘higher’ or ‘executive’ brain systems. Accurate detection of deception in humans may be of particular importance in forensic practice, while an understanding of its cognitive neurobiology may have implications for models of ‘theory of mind’ and social cognition, and societal notions of responsibility, guilt and mitigation. In recent years, functional neuroimaging techniques (especially functional magnetic resonance imaging) have been used to study deception. Though few in number, and using very different experimental protocols, studies published in the peer-reviewed literature exhibit certain consistencies. Attempted deception is associated with activation of executive brain regions (particularly prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices), while truthful responding has not been shown to be associated with any areas of increased activation (relative to deception). Hence, truthful responding may comprise a relative ‘baseline’ in human cognition and communication. The subject who lies may necessarily engage ‘higher’ brain centres, consistent with a purpose or intention (to deceive). While the principle of executive control during deception remains plausible, its precise anatomy awaits elucidation.

1 November 2005 in Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TFTom Farrow
Tom Farrow
TWThomas J. Whitford
Thomas J. Whitford
LWLeanne M. Williams
Leanne M. Williams
LGLavier Gomes
Lavier Gomes
AHAnthony W.F. Harris
Anthony W.F. Harris

1 December 2004 in Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EWEmma L. Wignall
Emma L. Wignall
JDJon M. Dickson
Jon M. Dickson
PVPaul Vaughan
Paul Vaughan
TFTom Farrow
Tom Farrow
IWIain D. Wilkinson
Iain D. Wilkinson
PWPeter W.R. Woodruff
Peter W.R. Woodruff