When compared with conventional replacement reinforcement methods, the method of replacement using a local reinforcement with an unsupported roof has the advantages of shortening the reinforcement cycle and reducing material loss, and many scholars have carried out useful explorations thereof. At present, the formula for the bearing capacity of reinforcement by replacing concrete in the Code does not consider the effect of stress hysteresis on the parts of the reinforcement; so when the initial stress level is greater than 0.4, the Code’s strength utilization coefficient of 0.8 for the new concrete in the replaced area is on the side of insecurity. In this study, we are trying to improve and supplement the formula in the Code through the following work. Firstly, 18 groups of shear wall models were constructed using a VFEAP finite element analysis program to analyze the bearing performances of the shear walls after the replacement. The results showed that the replacement concrete strength, the initial stress level and the size of the replaced area had a significant influence on the bearing capacity of the shear wall after the replacement. Secondly, utilizing the replacement concrete strength, the initial stress level and the size of the replacement area as key parameters, then introducing the strength improvement coefficient considering the constraints of the stirrups, the modified strength utilization coefficient of new concrete in the replaced area was formulated. Finally, based on the modified strength utilization coefficient, the replacement bearing capacity formulas for the one-batch, two-batch, and three-batch replacements were derived, and an N-batch replacement bearing capacity formula was regressed and fitted on the basis of these equations, which are less discrete and more secure than the Code’s formula.

In this paper, a novel T-shaped steel–concrete composite shear wall (TSCCW) is proposed. Low-cycle reciprocating tests were carried out on the TSCCW to investigate its performance in terms of its damage characteristics, hysteretic properties, energy dissipation capacity, stiffness degradation and ductility. A numerical model was established on the basis of the tests, and the correctness of the numerical model was verified. Afterwards, parameters such as shear span ratio, axial load ratio, rebar diameter, steel thickness, concrete strength grade and axial compression position were analyzed. The results show that the shear span ratio has a great influence on the performance of the TSCCW. A reduction in the shear span ratio from 2.1 to 1 reduces its stiffness by 333%. An increase in the axial load ratio will increase the load carrying capacity and stiffness of the TSCCW, and the deformation capacity will first increase and then decrease; it is recommended that the axial load ratio should be taken as 0.4. Increasing the steel thickness will improve the load carrying capacity, stiffness, deformation capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the TSCCW to a certain extent. Increasing the reinforcement diameter has less effect on the seismic performance of the TSCCW.

The vertical load-bearing performance of slab–column joints is significantly affected by bottom reinforcement and concealed beams, but existing studies remain insufficient in analyzing their influence mechanisms. To address this, the effects of bottom reinforcement, concealed beam width, and punch-to-span ratio on the mechanical properties of joints are systematically investigated in this study through finite element analysis. Validating 2 experimental models and establishing 13 parametric models, the results shows that adding bottom reinforcement can enhance the late-stage bearing capacity and ductility of joints; increasing the ratio of top-to-bottom reinforcement improves bearing capacity but reduces ductility; a wider concealed beam leads to better bearing capacity and ductility performance of the joint; and under the same concealed beam width, a larger punching–span ratio reduces bearing capacity but improves ductility. This study reveals the critical role of bottom reinforcement and concealed beams in joint performance, providing a theoretical basis for optimizing design.

To reduce the modeling effort and computational cost of assembled composite shear walls with C-shaped steel frames in global structural analysis, this study proposes an engineering-oriented simplified mechanical analysis method. Three representative specimens—a C-shaped steel-frame composite shear wall (CSCSW), a rectangular steel-frame composite shear wall (RSCSW), and a T-shaped, C-shaped steel-frame composite shear wall with a vertical connection (VTCSWC)—are decomposed into functional modules according to their load-transfer mechanisms. Simplified models comprising axial springs, diagonal braces, and a modified three-vertical-line-element model are established. Degrading bilinear Clough and trilinear Takeda models are adopted as the restoring-force relationships, and the governing parameters are determined through mechanical equilibrium analyses. The three simplified wall models are implemented in OpenSees to obtain hysteresis curves, skeleton curves, and stiffness-degradation responses. Comparisons with quasi-static test results show that the errors in peak load and secant stiffness are both within 10%, while the models reproduce the stiffness degradation and pinching characteristics of the specimens. Relative to refined three-dimensional solid finite element models, the proposed approach substantially reduces computational cost without compromising engineering accuracy, providing an efficient tool for structural design and seismic performance assessment of assembled C-shaped steel-framed composite shear-wall systems.

With the advancement of construction development, urban renewal, and urbanization, engineering appraisal and structural reinforcement will become crucial tasks in the construction industry, thus presenting both significant challenges and long-term responsibilities. The concept of “partial strengthening and replacement composite shear walls without support roof” refers to a structural system that utilizes the existing load-bearing capacity of RC shear walls. In this method, high-performance materials are used to locally remove and replace critical load-bearing sections of the wall to be strengthened, resulting in a “composite shear wall” structure composed of both strengthened replacement areas and non-replaced sections. This study proposes the concept of composite shear walls, conducts simulation analysis and exploratory research on their bearing performance, and explores engineering applications based on engineering examples. The research conclusions include the following: Compared to only one batch of replacement reinforcement, partial strengthening and replacement in batches can significantly improve the bearing performance of composite shear walls. The use of steel-reinforced concrete for local strengthening and replacement can significantly improve the bearing performance of composite shear walls, and the magnitude of the improvement in bearing performance decreases with the increase in the initial vertical stress level of the components. The overall structural stress condition after local strengthening and replacement reinforcement is good, and its vertical and horizontal bearing capacity can meet the original design requirements (after reinforcement, the vertical bearing capacity of the overall structure increased by about 6.3% compared to the original design, and the horizontal ultimate bearing capacity is about 1.4 times larger compared to the elastic–plastic “large earthquake” effect of the original design). Compared with conventional replacement methods, the unsupported-roof local reinforcement replacement method has the advantages of using high-performance materials, reducing reinforcement engineering, minimizing resource waste, and simplifying construction procedures, and has good application prospects.