Angela Stanisci

Prof. Angela Stanisci

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 January 2012 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMichael Gottfried
Michael Gottfried
HPHarald Pauli
Harald Pauli
AFAndreas Futschik
Andreas Futschik
MAMaia Akhalkatsi
Maia Akhalkatsi
PBPeter Barančok
Peter Barančok
GGGeorg Grabherr
Georg Grabherr

20 April 2012 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HPHarald Pauli
Harald Pauli
MGMichael Gottfried
Michael Gottfried
SDStefan Dullinger
Stefan Dullinger
OAOtari Abdaladze
Otari Abdaladze
MAMaia Akhalkatsi
Maia Akhalkatsi
GGGeorg Grabherr
Georg Grabherr
Climb Every Mountain: Mountaintop floras across Europe appear to be responding to climatic change in terms of upslope species range shifts. Pauli et al. (p. 353 ) systematically analyzed data gathered from standardized permanent plots on 66 high-mountain environments across Europe. On average, mountaintop species numbers have increased significantly during the last decade. However, this increase is a net effect of gains and losses, with losses particularly affecting mountains of Mediterranean regions and their endemic species. This turnover is largely consistent with model predictions and indicates that high-altitude species, and in particular the rich endemic alpine flora of many Mediterranean mountain ranges, will come under increasing pressure in the predicted warmer and drier climates in this region.

24 December 2010 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RERobin Engler
Robin Engler
CRChristophe F. Randin
Christophe F. Randin
WTWilfried Thuiller
Wilfried Thuiller
SDStefan Dullinger
Stefan Dullinger
NZNiklaus Zimmermann
Niklaus Zimmermann
AGAntoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan

26 July 2020 in Applied Vegetation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMilan Chytrý
Milan Chytrý
LTLubomír Tichý
Lubomír Tichý
SHStephan M. Hennekens
Stephan M. Hennekens
IKIlona Knollová
Ilona Knollová
JJJohn A. M. Janssen
John A. M. Janssen
JSJoop H. J. Schaminée
Joop H. J. Schaminée
Aim: The EUNIS Habitat Classification is a widely used reference framework for European habitat types (habitats), but it lacks formal definitions of individual habitats that would enable their unequivocal identification. Our goal was to develop a tool for assigning vegetation‐plot records to the habitats of the EUNIS system, use it to classify a European vegetation‐plot database, and compile statistically‐derived characteristic species combinations and distribution maps for these habitats.Location: Europe.Methods: We developed the classification expert system EUNIS‐ESy, which contains definitions of individual EUNIS habitats based on their species composition and geographic location. Each habitat was formally defined as a formula in a computer language combining algebraic and set‐theoretic concepts with formal logical operators. We applied this expert system to classify 1,261,373 vegetation plots from the European Vegetation Archive (EVA) and other databases. Then we determined diagnostic, constant and dominant species for each habitat by calculating species‐to‐habitat fidelity and constancy (occurrence frequency) in the classified data set. Finally, we mapped the plot locations for each habitat.Results: Formal definitions were developed for 199 habitats at Level 3 of the EUNIS hierarchy, including 25 coastal, 18 wetland, 55 grassland, 43 shrubland, 46 forest and 12 man‐made habitats. The expert system classified 1,125,121 vegetation plots to these habitat groups and 73,188 to other habitats, while 63,064 plots remained unclassified or were classified to more than one habitat. Data on each habitat were summarized in factsheets containing habitat description, distribution map, corresponding syntaxa and characteristic species combination.Conclusions: EUNIS habitats were characterized for the first time in terms of their species composition and distribution, based on a classification of a European database of vegetation plots using the newly developed electronic expert system EUNIS‐ESy. The data provided and the expert system have considerable potential for future use in European nature conservation planning, monitoring and assessment.

11 February 2022 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJonas Lembrechts
Jonas Lembrechts
JHJohan van Den Hoogen
Johan van Den Hoogen
JAJuha Aalto
Juha Aalto
MAMichael B. Ashcroft
Michael B. Ashcroft
PFPieter De Frenne
Pieter De Frenne
JLJonathan Lenoir
Jonathan Lenoir
Research in global change ecology relies heavily on global climatic grids derived from estimates of air temperature in open areas at around 2 m above the ground. These climatic grids do not reflect conditions below vegetation canopies and near the ground surface, where critical ecosystem functions occur and most terrestrial species reside. Here, we provide global maps of soil temperature and bioclimatic variables at a 1‐km2resolution for 0–5 and 5–15 cm soil depth. These maps were created by calculating the difference (i.e. offset) between in situ soil temperature measurements, based on time series from over 1200 1‐km2pixels (summarized from 8519 unique temperature sensors) across all the world's major terrestrial biomes, and coarse‐grained air temperature estimates from ERA5‐Land (an atmospheric reanalysis by the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts). We show that mean annual soil temperature differs markedly from the corresponding gridded air temperature, by up to 10°C (mean = 3.0 ± 2.1°C), with substantial variation across biomes and seasons. Over the year, soils in cold and/or dry biomes are substantially warmer (+3.6 ± 2.3°C) than gridded air temperature, whereas soils in warm and humid environments are on average slightly cooler (−0.7 ± 2.3°C). The observed substantial and biome‐specific offsets emphasize that the projected impacts of climate and climate change on near‐surface biodiversity and ecosystem functioning are inaccurately assessed when air rather than soil temperature is used, especially in cold environments. The global soil‐related bioclimatic variables provided here are an important step forward for any application in ecology and related disciplines. Nevertheless, we highlight the need to fill remaining geographic gaps by collecting more in situ measurements of microclimate conditions to further enhance the spatiotemporal resolution of global soil temperature products for ecological applications.

1 July 2018 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IDIka Djukic
Ika Djukic
SKSebastian Kepfer-Rojas
Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas
ISInger Kappel Schmidt
Inger Kappel Schmidt
KLKlaus Steenberg Larsen
Klaus Steenberg Larsen
CBClaus Beier
Claus Beier
ZTZsolt Tóth
Zsolt Tóth