Retrospective study of a series of 286 patients with congenital scoliosis (CS). To describe a large cohort of patients with CS and to propose an algorithm for genetic investigations CS is characterized by a spine curvature due to congenital malformations of the vertebrae and is frequently associated to other anomalies. The underlying causes remain unclear in most patients, although we know that genetics plays a role in the development of vertebral defects. Institutional review board approval was obtained. We performed a retrospective study by consulting the hospital charts of 286 patients with CS seen at the CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, from 2004 to 2015. We compile information on radiological findings, associated malformations, and genetic tests. Results showed that 67.1% of patients had associated anomalies affecting different systems. Only a minority of patients had a syndromic diagnosis to explain their CS. Nevertheless, array comparative genomic hybridization performed in a minority of patients showed a high detection rate (31.3% had a chromosomal anomaly among 32 tested). We suggest that every patient with CS should have thorough investigations to rule out associated anomalies and that different genetic tests should be offered according to the associated clinical findings. Level of Evidence: 4
27 December 2019 in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
The objective of the present study is to describe a cohort of complex esophageal atresia and the yield of genetic tests performed for such patients. We selected 45 patients with complex esophageal atresia (EA), namely those having at least one associated anomaly. We reviewed their medical records to assess clinical features, other diagnoses, and genetic investigations. Most of the patients had a diagnosis of VACTERL association (56%) with no genetic variant identified. Interestingly, 5 patients in the cohort (11%) had a right pulmonary hypoplasia or agenesis. A majority of our cohort (73%) had genetic testing; 60% were karyotyped (abnormal in 4 of the 27 patients tested), 31% had aCGH (abnormal in 1 of the 14 patients tested), and 31% had diepoxybutane (DEB) testing for Fanconi anemia (abnormal in 2 of the 14 patients tested). One patient had exome sequencing studies, but no candidate gene was identified. Various anomalies were associated with EA, and overall a genetic variant could be identified in 7 of the 33 patients tested. Chromosomal studies such as aCGH and chromosomal breakage studies should be considered, and their yield varied between 7 and 14%. Other genetic investigations such as exome sequencing could possibly have even higher yields but will need to be assessed in a large cohort. Improved genetic diagnoses in EA may improve the management of these patients by directing specific surveillance and management schemes.