In Rwanda, provider reimbursements for oxygen are based on the duration of patient consumption at a fixed hourly tariff rate. This study sought to assess whether the current insurance tariff in Rwanda was adequate to cover the costs of oxygen used in oxygen therapy and to explore alternative tariff models. The assessment found that hospitals make a marginal surplus from low volume flow rate patients and incur losses from patients who require high volume flow rates. In high volume nonspecialized hospitals with a large pool of patients consuming medical oxygen, low flow rate usage patients (e.g., neonates) tend to subsidize high flow usage patients (surgery), if the number of patients consuming low flow oxygen is higher than the latter. The study found that the current tariff was sufficient before the exponential surge in demand for high flow usage during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. A variable tariff that factors both the duration (hours) and the volume (liters) used during the therapy may require more work but better reflects the cost of consumption in each ward. A case-based payment model provides a standard pricing framework based on the patient’s diagnosis, intervention, and intensity of treatment. This study highlights the need for a transition from the time-based tariff structure to a case-based or volume-based tariff to incentivize sustainable production and provision (supply) of medical oxygen services at health facilities in Rwanda. Social health insurance reimbursement tariffs for medical oxygen need to reflect both duration and volume of consumption because oxygen therapy varies based on intervention, disease severity, patient age, length of stay, and responsiveness to treatment.

Background/Objectives: The middle-income countries (MICs) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region face multifaceted challenges—including fiscal constraints, conflict, and vaccine hesitancy—that impede the timely introduction of critical vaccines. This study examines the status, barriers, and facilitators to introducing three critical vaccines— human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), and rotavirus vaccine (RV) vaccine—across seven MENA MICs, to identify actionable solutions to enhance vaccine uptake and immunisation coverage. Methods: Using the READ methodology (ready materials, extract, analyse, and distil data), this review systematically analysed policy documents, reports, and literature on the introduction of HPV, PCV, and RV vaccines in seven MENA MICs. A data extraction framework was designed to capture the status of vaccine introduction and barriers and facilitators to introduction. Findings and data gaps were validated with stakeholder consultations. Results: Of the seven study countries, progress in introducing PCV and RV has been uneven across the region (five countries have introduced PCV while four have introduced the RV vaccine), while HPV vaccine rollout remains limited to one country, hindered by vaccine hesitancy, fiscal challenges, and insufficient epidemiological data. Morocco is the only country to introduce all three vaccines, while Egypt has yet to introduce any. Other common barriers include the impact of conflict and displacement on healthcare infrastructure, delayed introduction due to the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, limited local production facilities and regional cooperation. In addition, not all countries eligible for Gavi MICs support have applied. These findings provide a roadmap for policymakers to accelerate equitable vaccine introduction in the MENA region. Conclusions: Targeted efforts, such as addressing fiscal constraints, improving local manufacturing, tackling gender barriers, and fostering public trust, paired with regional collaboration, can help bridge gaps and ensure no community is left behind in preventing vaccine-preventable diseases.

Background/Objectives: The middle-income countries (MICs) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region face multifaceted challenges—including fiscal constraints, conflict, and vaccine hesitancy—that impede the timely introduction of critical vaccines. This study examines the status, barriers, and facilitators to introducing three critical vaccines—human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), and rotavirus vaccine (RV)—across seven MENA MICs, to identify actionable solutions to enhance vaccine uptake and immunisation coverage. Methods: Using the READ methodology (ready materials, extract, analyse, and distil data), this review systematically analysed policy documents, reports, and the literature on the introduction of HPV, PCV, and RV vaccines in seven MENA MICs. A data extraction framework was designed to capture the status of vaccine introduction and barriers and facilitators to introduction. Findings and data gaps were validated with stakeholder consultations. Results: Of the seven study countries, progress in introducing PCV and RV has been uneven across the region (five countries have introduced PCV, four have introduced RV, and only a single country has introduced HPV at time of writing), hindered by vaccine hesitancy, fiscal challenges, and insufficient epidemiological data. Morocco is the only country to introduce all three vaccines, while Egypt has yet to introduce any. Other common barriers include the impact of conflict and displacement on healthcare infrastructure, delayed introduction due to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and limited local production facilities and regional cooperation. In addition, not all countries eligible for Gavi MICs support have applied. These findings provide a roadmap for policymakers to accelerate equitable vaccine introduction in the MENA region. Conclusions: Targeted efforts, such as addressing fiscal constraints, improving local manufacturing, tackling gender barriers, and fostering public trust, paired with regional collaboration, can help bridge gaps and ensure no community is left behind in preventing vaccine-preventable diseases.