Sofia Silvério Serra

Dr. Sofia Silvério Serra

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 December 2023
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
SSSofia Silvério Serra
Sofia Silvério Serra
Jorge RevezJorge Revez
Jorge Revez
The social inclusion of forced migrants includes responding to their information needs. This investigation seeks to analyze public librarians' perceptions of the role of public libraries in such process. The research framework is the constructivist paradigm and uses the case study method to, through the semi-directive interview technique, investigate sixteen municipal public libraries in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. The results highlight that forced migrants are not identified users of these libraries. However, public librarians equate them to economic migrants in informational needs and behaviors, highlighting the importance of free internet access, the resources in foreign languages, the Portuguese language courses, and the help to interact with online platforms. As shortcomings, there are few Portuguese courses for foreigners, limited practice in job search, housing and inclusive collaboration with schools, and limitations in terms of space and human and financial resources. These difficulties can be overcome with the motivation to fulfil the public library's inclusive social mission, its universal accessibility and informal environment, and the promotions of cohesion and social capital. While the mission of libraries fits the purpose of forced migrants’ inclusion, the education and training of librarians could be improved. It is recommended that the public libraries increase their proactivity and collaboration with existing inclusion networks. In conclusion, this research aims to raise awareness of the urgency of developing a strategic plan for Portuguese public libraries for the social inclusion of forced migrants, and to promote its institutional and social legitimacy.

1 December 2025 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JAJoão Alves
João Alves
TMTânia Meneses
Tânia Meneses
MMMafalda Mariano
Mafalda Mariano
SSSofia Silvério Serra
Sofia Silvério Serra
TCTeresa Costa
Teresa Costa
JLJorge Lima
Jorge Lima
To evaluate the association between the endometriosis staging and the type and intensity of pain reported by patients, describing the pain intensity across different pain types. On January 27, 2025, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The search terms included endometriosis, pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, dyschezia, dysuria, and classification. Eligible studies examined women with endometriosis, assessing how endometriosis staging (rASRM or ENZIAN classification) correlated with pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, dyschezia, dysuria, and chronic pelvic pain) measured with validated tools. Two reviewers extracted data independently, with a third verifying results. Pain scores were log-transformed to stabilize variance, and proportions of women with advanced endometriosis were analyzed on the logit scale. Given high heterogeneity, random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood were used. Of 2527 records, 112 studies were reviewed and eight met inclusion criteria (seven using rASRM, one using ENZIAN). Dysmenorrhea showed the highest mean intensity (6.61, 95% CI: 4.43-10.10), while dysuria was lowest (1.08, 95% CI: 0.62-1.89). Pain intensity did not differ significantly between rASRM stages I/II and III/IV (p > 0.05), though chronic pelvic pain was more frequent in advanced disease (p < 0.05). Dysmenorrhea is linked to higher pain intensity in women with endometriosis, while dysuria is linked to lower intensity. Pain intensity is not associated with the rASRM stage; however, chronic pelvic pain seems more prevalent in advanced stages of the disease.

26 December 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJoão Miguel Casanova
João Miguel Casanova
ABAlexandru Babiciu
Alexandru Babiciu
GDGonçalo Duarte
Gonçalo Duarte
ACAna Costa
Ana Costa
SSSofia Silvério Serra
Sofia Silvério Serra
JLJorge Lima
Jorge Lima
Objective: Our primary objective was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with abnormal p53 FIGO grade 3 (high-grade) endometrioid endometrial cancer. As secondary objectives, we determined the global prevalence of abnormal p53 in grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas and the geographical variations. Methods: The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. We followed the Meta-Analysis for Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (no: CRD42023495192). Bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. For time-to-event data, the effect of p53 status on grade 3 endometrial cancer was described using hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed using one- and two-stage approaches, the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Fifty-seven studies with 2528 patients were included. Patients with abnormal p53 had an increased risk of death (HR, 1.29 (95% CI, 1.11–1.48); I2 = 88%) and disease progression (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.42–1.88; I2 = 2%) compared with patients with wildtype p53 G3 endometrial cancer. The global pooled prevalence of abnormal p53 was 30% (95% CI, 25–34%; tau2 = 0.02; I2 = 74%), with the highest prevalence being found in studies conducted in Asia (95% CI, 27–41%; tau2 = 0.01; I2 = 52%). Conclusions: Abnormal p53 grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer is more common in Asia, and it is associated with decreased overall survival and progression-free survival.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGManuela Gomes
Manuela Gomes
MÂMiguel Ângelo Simão Ângelo-Dias
Miguel Ângelo Simão Ângelo-Dias
GDGonçalo Duarte
Gonçalo Duarte
SDSara Dias
Sara Dias
SSSofia Silvério Serra
Sofia Silvério Serra
JLJorge Lima
Jorge Lima
Background: Low fibrinogen levels are associated with an increased risk of perioperative bleeding. However, there is an ongoing debate over the ideal treatment threshold, the benefits of prophylactic supplementation with fibrinogen concentrate, and the best source of fibrinogen. While fibrinogen concentrate supplementation is being widely used to treat bleeding related to acquired haemostatic deficiencies, there is a lack of evidence regarding its dosage, effectiveness, and safety. This systematic review provides an up-to-date summary of the relationship between fibrinogen concentrate supplementation and safety measures in the perioperative care of non-trauma, non-obstetric adult patients. Methods: A comprehensive online search was conducted on PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis encompasses ten studies involving 1391 patients. There was a decreased risk of total thromboembolic events in patients treated with fibrinogen compared to the control (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.98, I2 = 0%). In addition, when fibrinogen was used prophylactically, it resulted in shorter ICU stays (MD −1.50, 95% CI −2.64 to −0.36), when set against its therapeutic use. A sensitivity analysis on cardiovascular surgery studies did not reveal any statistically significant difference. Conclusions: The use of fibrinogen concentrate in the perioperative care of non-trauma and non-obstetric adult patients may lead to potential benefits.

26 October 2023 in JMIR Research Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRSilvia Rego
Silvia Rego
AHAna Rita Henriques
Ana Rita Henriques
SSSofia Silvério Serra
Sofia Silvério Serra
TCTeresa Costa
Teresa Costa
ARAna Maria Rodrigues
Ana Maria Rodrigues
FNFrancisco Nunes
Francisco Nunes
Background: Clinical trials often use digital technologies to collect data continuously outside the clinic and use the derived digital endpoints as trial endpoints. Digital endpoints are also being developed to support diagnosis, monitoring, or therapeutic interventions in clinical care. However, clinical validation stands as a significant challenge, as there are no specific guidelines orienting the validation of digital endpoints. Objective: This paper presents the protocol for a scoping review that aims to map the existing methods for the clinical validation of digital endpoints. Methods: The scoping review will comprise searches from the electronic literature databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus (including conference proceedings), Embase, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Xplore, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) Digital Library, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science Core Collection (including conference proceedings), and Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. We will also include various sources of gray literature with search terms related to digital endpoints. The methodology will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute Scoping Review and the Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews. Results: A search for reviews on the existing evidence related to this topic was conducted and has shown that no such review was previously undertaken. This review will provide a systematic assessment of the literature on methods for the clinical validation of digital endpoints and highlight any potential need for harmonization or reporting of methods. The results will include the methods for the clinical validation of digital endpoints according to device, digital endpoint, and clinical application goal of digital endpoints. The study started in January 2023 and is expected to end by December 2023, with results to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Conclusions: A scoping review of methodologies that validate digital endpoints is necessary. This review will be unique in its breadth since it will comprise digital endpoints collected from several devices and not focus on a specific disease area. The results of our work should help guide researchers in choosing validation methods, identify potential gaps in the literature, or inform the development of novel methods to optimize the clinical validation of digital endpoints. Resolving these gaps is the key to presenting evidence in a consistent way to regulators and other parties and obtaining regulatory acceptance of digital endpoints for patient benefit. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/47119

2 February 2024 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMargarida Gil Conde
Margarida Gil Conde
ICIsabel Costa
Isabel Costa
SSSofia Silvério Serra
Sofia Silvério Serra
RRRaquel Carmona Ramos
Raquel Carmona Ramos
CRCristina Ribeiro
Cristina Ribeiro
Paulo NicolaPaulo Nicola
Paulo Nicola
Introduction The qualities of primary healthcare (PHC) make it a very relevant environment for research; however, there is still work to be done to enhance the research capabilities of family physicians in healthcare units. Considering there is no ongoing review that specifically addresses this objective, the proposed goal of this scoping review is to determine the depth of the literature on the current strategies that support research capacity building among family physicians in the context of PHC. Methods and analysis The scoping review will include studies from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and grey literature, published from 2008 to 2023, that address strategies to promote research capacity building among family physicians in the context of PHC. Only studies published in English, Portuguese or Spanish will be considered. All study designs, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies, will be eligible for inclusion. The literature search will be performed from January to March of 2024 and data charting will employ a descriptive-analytical method, systematically summarising study objectives, methodologies, findings and implications. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the review will employ the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Ethics and dissemination This review does not need ethical approval. Peer-reviewed publications, policy summaries, presentations at conferences and involvement with pertinent stakeholders are all part of our outreach approach.