Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) causes severe central nervous system damage. M2 macrophages within the lesion are crucial for SCI recovery. Our previous research revealed that M2 macrophages transfected with magnetotactic bacteria–derived Mms6 gene can resist ferroptosis and enhance SCI recovery. To address the limitations of M2 macrophage transplantation, we developed lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) encapsulating Mms6 mRNA targeting macrophages ( Mms6 mRNA-PS/LNPs). The targeting efficiency and therapeutic effect of these LNPs in SCI mice were evaluated. Intravenous administration of Mms6 mRNA-PS/LNPs delivered more Mms6 mRNAs to lesion-site macrophages than those in the Mms6 mRNA-LNP group, which resulted in enhancing motor function recovery, reducing lesion area and scar formation, and promoting neuronal survival and nerve fiber repair. These effects were nullified when macrophages were depleted. These findings suggest that macrophage-targeted delivery of Mms6 mRNA is a promising therapeutic strategy for promoting spinal cord repair and motor function recovery in patients with traumatic SCI.

Sigma‐1 receptor (Sigmar1) is a specific chaperone located in the mitochondria‐associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane (MAM) and plays a role in several physiological processes. However, the role of Sigmar1 in bone homeostasis remains unknown. Here, we show that mice lacking Sigmar1 exhibited severe osteoporosis in an ovariectomized model. In contrast, overexpression of Sigmar1 locally alleviated the osteoporosis phenotype. Treatment with Sigmar1 agonists impaired both human and mice osteoclast formation in vitro. Mechanistically, SERCA2 was identified to interact with Sigmar1 based on the immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrum (IP‐MS) and co‐immunoprecipitation (co‐IP) assays, and Q615 of SERCA2 was confirmed to be the critical residue for their binding. Furthermore, Sigmar1 promoted SERCA2 degradation through Hrd1/Sel1L‐dependent ER‐associated degradation (ERAD). Ubiquitination of SERCA2 at K460 and K541 was responsible for its proteasomal degradation. Consequently, inhibition of SERCA2 impeded Sigmar1 deficiency enhanced osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, we found that dimemorfan, an FDA‐approved Sigmar1 agonist, effectively rescued bone mass in various established bone‐loss models. In conclusion, Sigmar1 is a negative regulator of osteoclastogenesis, and activation of Sigmar1 by dimemorfan may be a potential treatment for osteoporosis in clinical practice.

Emerging evidence indicates that circRNAs are broadly expressed in osteosarcoma (OS) cells and play a crucial role in OS progression. Recently, cancer-specific circRNA circPRKAR1B has been identified by high-throughput sequencing and is recorded in publicly available databases. Nevertheless, the detailed functions and underlying mechanisms of circPRKAR1B in OS remains poorly understood. By functional experiments, we found that circPRKAR1B enhanced OS cell proliferation, migration, and promotes OS epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Mechanistic investigations suggested that circPRKAR1B promotes OS progression through sponging miR-361-3p to modulate the expression of FZD4. Subsequently, we identified that EIF4A3 promoted cirPRKAR1B formation through binding to the downstream target of circPRKAR1B on PRKAR1B mRNA. Further rescue study revealed that overexpression of the Wnt signalling could impair the onco-suppressor activities of the silencing of circPRKAR1B. Interestingly, further experiments indicated that circPRKAR1B is involved in the sensitivity of chemoresistance in OS. On the whole, our results demonstrated that circPRKAR1B exerted oncogenic roles in OS and suggested the circPRKAR1B/miR-361-3p/FZD4 axis plays an important role in OS progression and might be a potential therapeutic target.