Among patients with treatment-naive hepatocellular carcinoma, glass microsphere radiation segmentectomy before liver transplant achieved high rates of complete pathologic necrosis, which was positively associated with the number of optimized treatment parameter thresholds.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as first-line therapy for advanced-stage HCC with modest response rates (<33%). Combination treatments offer the potential to improve response rates while improving outcomes. This study evaluates the safety and outcomes of first-line Yttrium-90 plus ICI (⁹⁰Y-ICI). A retrospective, multi-center study was conducted in HCC patients receiving first-line ⁹⁰Y-ICI with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) or tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Treme/Durva). Treatment response was evaluated at follow-up for planned ⁹⁰Y treatment cycle. Time-to-event measures of time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) served as primary endpoints, with first cycle response rates and AEs as secondary outcomes. This study included 37 patients receiving ⁹⁰Y-ICI from 2021 to 2024 (16-month median follow-up). The cohort was predominantly Child-Pugh A (92%) with HCV-related cirrhosis (67%), advanced stage (54%), and a median index HCC size of 8.0 cm (IQR: 6—12 cm). Grade 3–4 AEs occurred in six patients (16%). The target objective response (OR) rate was 83%, with a 50% target complete response (CR) rate. Overall OR was 61% with an overall CR of 39%. Median PFS was 11 months with 1-year rates of 50%. Patients with a target CR had improved TTP (p = 0.004), PFS (p = 0.003), and OS (p = 0.003). The cohort’s 2-year OS was 41% with a median OS of 19 months (CI: 12–37 months). First-line ⁹⁰Y-ICI therapy in HCC is safe and effective, with no deviation in anticipated results. Patients achieving target CR showed significantly improved TTP, PFS, and OS, supporting target CR as an optimal treatment target.

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an established therapy for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Outcomes depend heavily on dosimetry, which has evolved from empirical and body-surface-area methods to partition and voxel-based approaches. This review summarizes current evidence for advanced (personalized) dosimetry across tumor types, highlights emerging dose–response concepts, and outlines practical barriers and implementation strategies. A narrative review of peer-reviewed clinical studies and trials evaluating dosimetry in TARE, with emphasis on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and breast cancer liver metastases, was performed with comparison of single-compartment medical internal radiation dosimetry method (MIRD), partition (multicompartment) methods, and voxel-based dosimetry methodologies. Personalized dosimetry improves outcomes in multiple tumor types. A randomized trial in HCC showed superior overall survival with partition-based dosing versus MIRD. In selective HCC treatments, voxel-derived metrics (e.g., D95) correlate with complete pathologic necrosis, suggesting benefit beyond mean dose targets. For iCCA, data associate higher tumor doses with better radiologic response, progression-free survival, and downstaging. In mCRC, voxel-based and threshold analyses link specific tumor and margin doses with metabolic/radiographic response and survival. Smaller series in NET and breast cancer indicate dose–response relationships using advanced dosimetry. Evidence supports broader adoption of advanced dosimetry in TARE. Emerging strategies that ensure adequate coverage of the “coldest” tumor regions and thoughtful particle-load planning may further optimize results. Standardized protocols, prospective validation, and scalable workflows are needed to accelerate implementation.

Translational strategies to characterize and monitor extracellular vesicles such as exosome (EX) shedding and the clinical impact of this data within hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. In this study, EX shedding was assessed in early-stage HCC and evaluated as a stratification factor for time to progression (TTP) following first-cycle liver-directed therapy (LDT). Plasma EXs were isolated from HCC patients undergoing LDT using ultracentrifugation. Purified EXs were stained using markers CD9 and CD63 and quantified using an ImageStreamX flow cytometer. Circulating EXs expressing CD9 were isolated at 10-fold higher levels compared to CD63. The intensity of CD9+ EX shedding following LDT was positively correlated with treatment response. High post-LDT CD9+ EX shedding stratified TTP risk with a 30% lower frequency of disease progression at 1 year following LDT. Post-LDT high CD9+ EX shedding was observed in 100% (10/10) of patients successfully bridged to liver transplantation while only 22% (2/9) of patients with tumor progression had high CD9+ EX shedding post-LDT. CD9+ EX shedding also stratified TTP risk within the first cycle objective response rate (ORR) group, identifying patients still at higher disease progression. EX shedding was concordant with imaging response rate, stratified TTP in early-stage HCC, and may have important implications for assessing post-LDT viable, biologically aggressive HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in the world. Patients with early-stage HCC are treated with liver-directed therapies to bridge or downstage for liver transplantation (LT). In this study, the impact of HCC care delay on HCC progression among early-stage patients was investigated. Early-stage HCC patients undergoing their first cycle of liver-directed therapy (LDT) for bridge/downstaging to LT between 04/2016 and 04/2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline variables were analyzed for risk of disease progression and time to progression (TTP). HCC care delay was determined by the number of rescheduled appointments related to HCC care. The study cohort consisted of 316 patients who received first-cycle LDT. The HCC care no-show rate was associated with TTP (p = 0.004), while the overall no-show rate was not (p = 0.242). The HCC care no-show rate and HCC care delay were further expanded as no-show rates and rescheduled appointments for imaging, laboratory, and office visits, respectively. More than 60% of patients experienced HCC care delay for imaging and laboratory appointments compared to just 8% for office visits. Multivariate analysis revealed that HCC-specific no-show rates and HCC care delay for imaging (p < 0.001) were both independently associated with TTP, highlighting the importance of minimizing delays in early-stage HCC imaging surveillance to reduce disease progression risk.