Patrick Harrington

Dr. Patrick Harrington

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 June 2021 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPatrick Harrington
Patrick Harrington
KDKatie J. Doores
Katie J. Doores
DRDeepti H. Radia
Deepti H. Radia
AOAmy O’rEilly
Amy O’rEilly
HLHo Pui Jeff Lam
Ho Pui Jeff Lam
HLHugues de Lavallade
Hugues de Lavallade
Summary: Patients receiving targeted cancer treatments such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been classified in the clinically extremely vulnerable group to develop severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), including patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) taking TKIs. In addition, concerns that immunocompromised individuals with solid and haematological malignancies may not mount an adequate immune response to a single dose of SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT162b2 (Pfizer‐BioNTech) vaccine have been raised. In the present study, we evaluated humoral and cellular immune responses after a first injection of BNT162b2 vaccine in 16 patients with CML. Seroconversion and cellular immune response before and after vaccination were assessed. By day 21 after vaccination, anti‐Spike immunoglobulin G was detected in 14/16 (87·5%) of the patients with CML and all developed a neutralising antibody response [serum dilution that inhibits 50% infection (ID50) >50], including medium (ID50 of 200–500) or high (ID50 of 501–2000) neutralising antibodies titres in nine of the 16 (56·25%) patients. T‐cell response was seen in 14/15 (93·3%) evaluable patients, with polyfunctional responses seen in 12/15 (80%) patients (polyfunctional CD4+ response nine of 15, polyfunctional CD8+ T‐cell response nine of 15). These data demonstrate the immunogenicity of a single dose of SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT162b2 vaccine in most patients with CML, with both neutralising antibodies and polyfunctional T‐cell responses seen in contrast to patients with solid tumour or lymphoid haematological malignancies.

22 May 2021 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PHPatrick Harrington
Patrick Harrington
HLHugues de Lavallade
Hugues de Lavallade
KDKatie J. Doores
Katie J. Doores
AOAmy O’rEilly
Amy O’rEilly
JSJeffrey Seow
Jeffrey Seow
DMDonal P. McLornan
Donal P. McLornan

8 August 2024 in HemaSphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ADAndrea Duminuco
Andrea Duminuco
JYJoshua Au Yeung
Joshua Au Yeung
RVRaj Vaghela
Raj Vaghela
SVSukhraj Virdee
Sukhraj Virdee
CWClaire Woodley
Claire Woodley
PHPatrick Harrington
Patrick Harrington

9 March 2021 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PDPaul Deschamps
Paul Deschamps
MMMufaddal Moonim
Mufaddal Moonim
DRDeepti H. Radia
Deepti H. Radia
NCNATALIA CURTO-GARCIA
NATALIA CURTO-GARCIA
CWClaire Woodley
Claire Woodley
DMDonal P. McLornan
Donal P. McLornan

24 July 2025 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrea DuminucoAndrea Duminuco
Andrea Duminuco
RVRaj Vaghela
Raj Vaghela
SVSukhraj Virdee
Sukhraj Virdee
CWClaire Woodley
Claire Woodley
SASusan Asirvatham
Susan Asirvatham
PHPatrick Harrington
Patrick Harrington
Thromboembolic events (TE) represent the commonest cause of morbidity and mortality in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET). The QRISK3 model is a tool for predicting TE in the general population, with 7.5% recognised as a threshold to identify high-risk patients. We analyzed data of 937 patients (490 ET and 447 PV) with a median follow-up of 85 and 95 months, reporting an occurrence of 52 and 73 TE, respectively. Median QRISK3 scores at diagnosis were higher in conventional high-risk patients in both cohorts (ET; 4.2 in high-risk vs. 2.4 in low-risk, PV; 8.8 vs. 2.8, p < 0.001). During follow-up, a QRISK3 score greater than 7.5%, demonstrated potential to further stratify individuals at high risk of TE, outperforming standard risk assessments in both low and high-risk patients. Using cytoreductive treatment instead of active surveillance in patients with QRISK3 ≥ 7.5% conferred a reduced risk of thrombosis in both cohorts. Of this group, 79.7% with ET and 86.9% with PV, on cytoreductive therapy, remained thrombosis free, compared with 64.1% and 57.1% of those not receiving cytoreductive therapy (p = 0.018/0.034). QRISK3 identifies patients in whom cytoreductive therapies may be indicated, and provides a tool that allows patients to assess, monitor and reduce their cardiovascular risk.

10 July 2017 in Obstetric Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPatrick Harrington
Patrick Harrington
CNCatherine Nelson-Piercy
Catherine Nelson-Piercy
CWCatherine Williamson
Catherine Williamson
NCNichola Cooper
Nichola Cooper
RKRachel Kesse-Adu
Rachel Kesse-Adu
SRSusan Robinson
Susan Robinson
A 34-year-old woman presented at 29 weeks gestation of a twin pregnancy, with a platelet count of 1 × 109/l. She was extensively investigated and was subsequently diagnosed with severe immune thrombocytopenia. She did not respond to initial treatment with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. She also failed to respond to second-line therapies of Anti-D immunoglobulin, Azathioprine and the thrombopoietin agonist Romiplostim. Her case was further complicated by an episode of obstetric cholestasis possibly related to Azathioprine treatment. She went on to require plasma exchange around the time of an elective Caesarean section which provided temporary improvement in the platelet count and enabled safe delivery. This case highlights some of the challenges faced in the management of patients with severe and refractory immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy.