Arkajyoti Sarkar

Mr. Arkajyoti Sarkar

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2026 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
YLYingnan Lei
Yingnan Lei
NKNusa Krivec
Nusa Krivec
ASArkajyoti Sarkar
Arkajyoti Sarkar
MDMai Chi Duong
Mai Chi Duong
AHAnfien Huyghebaert
Anfien Huyghebaert
CSClaudia Spits
Claudia Spits
Background: Gains of chromosome 20q11.21 are among the most common culture-acquired abnormalities in human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC), conferring a well-defined survival advantage while altering differentiation capacity. However, it remains unclear whether this advantage persists during differentiation, how the aneuploidy alters ectodermal and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) lineage specification, and which genes within the minimal amplicon drive these effects. Methods: We used three isogenic human embryonic stem cell line pairs (wild-type and 20q11.21 gain) and assessed their behaviour in two neuroectoderm differentiation systems: directed neuroectoderm induction (dual SMAD inhibition) and long-term spontaneous RPE differentiation. Competitive dynamics were measured in mixed cultures, and lineage outcomes were analysed using immunostaining, gene expression profiling and single-cell RNA sequencing. To identify driver genes, we generated BCL2L1 and ID1 overexpression lines and tested their effects under both directed and spontaneous differentiation conditions. Results: Across all lines and conditions, 20q cells expanded from a minor fraction to dominate mixed cultures, indicating that their competitive advantage persists beyond the undifferentiated state. Despite this dominance, pure 20q cells failed to specify to neuroectoderm or RPE. Single-cell transcriptomics revealed consistent diversion toward non-neural ectodermal and extraembryonic fates. Mechanistically, overexpression of BCL2L1 and ID1 alone or in combination impaired neuroectoderm specification, while synergistic effect of both genes promoted non-neural ectodermal outcomes under directed differentiation conditions. In spontaneous differentiation, both genes could disrupt differentiation. Conclusions: The 20q11.21 gain couples a persistent survival advantage with a disruption of neural and RPE lineage competence, redirecting cells toward alternative ectodermal and extraembryonic fates. These effects arise from the combined action of two dosage-sensitive genes BCL2L1 and ID1 within the amplicon, illustrating how regional gene dosage can reshape developmental signalling responses in hPSC.

11 August 2025 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Diana Al DelbanyDiana Al Delbany
Diana Al Delbany
MDMai Chi Duong
Mai Chi Duong
MRMarius Regin
Marius Regin
ASArkajyoti Sarkar
Arkajyoti Sarkar
ARAyoub Radi
Ayoub Radi
CSClaudia Spits
Claudia Spits
C-C motif chemokine receptor-like 2 (CCRL2) is an atypical chemokine receptor (ACKR) that binds chemerin with high affinity but lacks classical G protein-coupled signaling. Instead, it functions as a non-signaling presenter of chemerin to CMKLR1-expressing cells, modulating antitumor immunity. CCRL2 is highly expressed in the tumor microenvironment and various human cancers, and its expression has been linked to delayed tumor growth in mouse models, primarily through the chemerin/CMKLR1 axis. While CCRL2’s role in immune surveillance is well established, its tumor cell-intrinsic functions remain less clear. Here, we investigated the impact of CCRL2 overexpression and knockout on tumor cell behavior in vitro. Although CCRL2 did not affect proliferation, migration, or clonogenicity in B16F0 melanoma and LLC cells, it significantly influenced spheroid morphology in B16F0 cells. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that CCRL2 modulates innate immune signaling pathways, including TLR4 and IFN-γ/STAT1, with context-dependent downstream effects. These findings suggest that CCRL2 shapes tumor architecture by rewiring inflammatory signaling networks in a cell-intrinsic manner. Further studies in other cancer types and cell models are needed to determine whether CCRL2’s regulatory role is broadly conserved and to explore its potential as a therapeutic target in solid tumors.