OBJECTIVE: Placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) in CSF can provide a very high diagnostic value in cases of intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs), especially in pure germinomas, to the level of not requiring histological confirmation. Unlike other tumor markers, reliable data analysis with respect to the diagnostic value of PLAP serum or CSF levels has not been available until now. This is the first systematic and comprehensive study examining the diagnostic value of CSF PLAP in patients with intracranial GCTs.METHODS: From 2004 to 2014, 74 patients (average age 19.6 ± 10.6 years) with intracranial GCTs were evaluated using PLAP from their CSF and histological samples. Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay was utilized to measure CSF PLAP in the following tumor sites: pineal (n = 32), pituitary stalk, suprasellar (n = 16), basal ganglia (n = 15), intraventricular (n = 9), and cerebellar (n = 5) regions. In addition to classifying GCT cases, all patients underwent tumor biopsy for correlation with tumor marker data.RESULTS: PLAP in combination with other tumor markers resulted in extremely high sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic value of intracranial GCTs. Intracranial GCT cases were classified into 1) germinomas, both “pure” and syncytiotrophoblastic giant cell types (n = 38); 2) nongerminomatous GCTs, choriocarcinomas (n = 9) and teratomas (n = 4); and 3) nongerminomas, other kinds of tumors (n = 23). Consequently, all patients received chemoradiation therapy based on elevation of PLAP and the histopathological results. It was also speculated that the level of PLAP could show the amount of intracranial germ cell components of a GCT. PLAP was 100% upregulated in all intracranial germinoma cases. The absence of CSF PLAP proved that the tumor was not a germinoma.CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the first systematic and comprehensive examination of the diagnostic value of the tumor marker PLAP in pediatric patients with intracranial GCT. Using the level of PLAP in CSF, we were able to detect the instances of intracranial germinoma with very high reliability, equivalent to a pathological diagnosis.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) targets tumor cell remnants after resection. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of PDT for malignant brain tumors in children and young adolescents. This was a single-center, non-randomized, phase I/II clinical study. The primary endpoints were the safety of treatment with talaporfin sodium (TS) (phase I) and overall survival (OS) after PDT (phase II). The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after PDT. The TS dose was determined by dose escalation from 10 to 20 to 40 mg/m² for every three cases starting from the initial enrolled case. Eight patients with a mean age of 170.2 months (129–214 months) at the time of PDT received nine procedures with a mean follow-up duration of 16.8 months (1–42 months) after PDT. Histopathological diagnoses included supratentorial anaplastic ependymoma (n = 2), anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 1), diffuse midline glioma with H3K27M mutation (n = 1), glioblastoma (n = 3), and pediatric high-grade glioma (n = 1). The outcome was survival in five patients and death in three patients. Recurrence occurred in six of the eight patients; the remaining two were recurrence-free after PDT. Therefore, OS and PFS were calculated as 21 and 6 months, respectively. Seizures and fevers, which were likely surgery-related symptoms, were commonly observed. Photosensitive skin rashes or liver dysfunction, which are common adverse effects in adults, were not observed. Our results showed that TS can be used safely in children at doses comparable to those used in adults, as there was no major complication associated with TS administration. However, we cannot make a definitive conclusion about the efficacy of PDT because of the small number of participants. Accumulating cases was difficult because of the rarity of pediatric brain tumors and the difficulty in making a preoperative differential diagnosis, considering the wide range of histopathological findings. Moreover, the psychological stress associated with light-shielding management in pediatric patients was more severe than initially expected. In conclusion, TS at doses comparable to those used in adults may be safe for use in children and young adolescents between the ages of 6 and 20 years. However, further studies are needed to clarify its efficacy.