The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission was recommended by the 2007 National Research Council Decadal Survey to expand on previous altimetry missions like TOPEX/Poseidon. Utilizing wide-swath altimetry technology, SWOT aims to achieve complete coverage of the world’s oceans and freshwater bodies through high-resolution elevation measurements. SWOT received approval for implementation in 2016, it was ultimately launched in December 2022, and it is currently delivering preliminary data to the public. The primary instrument in SWOT is the Ka-band Radar Interferometer (KaRIn) which utilizes JPL-developed radar interferometry technology to measure ocean and surface water levels with unprecedented accuracy. This paper focuses on the challenges in designing, testing, and finally commissioning in flight a complex instrument like KaRIn. We also present preliminary flight performance and compare it with ground measurements and simulations. Our analysis indicates that KaRIn meets or exceeds all its requirements, but it has also revealed several interesting and unexpected observations, offering just a glimpse of future scientific discoveries that KaRIn will enable.

Estimates of above ground biomass density in forests are crucial for refining global climate models and understanding climate change. Although data from field studies can be aggregated to estimate carbon stocks on global scales, the sparsity of such field data, temporal heterogeneity and methodological variations introduce large errors. Remote sensing measurements from spaceborne sensors are a realistic alternative for global carbon accounting; however, the uncertainty of such measurements is not well known and remains an active area of research. This article describes an effort to collect field data at the Harvard and Howland Forest sites, set in the temperate forests of the Northeastern United States in an attempt to establish ground truth forest biomass for calibration of remote sensing measurements. We present an assessment of the quality of ground truth biomass estimates derived from three different sets of diameter-based allometric equations over the Harvard and Howland Forests to establish the contribution of errors in ground truth data to the error in biomass estimates from remote sensing measurements.

Estimating the amount of above ground biomass in forested areas and the measurement of carbon flux through the quantification of disturbance and regrowth are critical to develop a better understanding of ecosystem processes. Well-resolved and globally consistent inventories of forest carbon must rely on remote sensing measurements, particularly from polarimetric radars. While a wide variety of studies conducted over the past three decades have shown how radar polarimetric measurements can be used to estimate above ground carbon for regions with less than 100 Mg of biomass per hectare, there is no established methodology for assessing biomass estimation accuracy based on a priori instrument and mission parameters. In this paper, a framework for assessing biomass estimation accuracy is presented that is a blend of the basic imaging physics and empirically derived parameters that describe various relationships between biomass and radar polarimetric observable quantities. The implications of this error model on the design and performance of a polarimetric radar are explored using instrument, mission, and science parameters from a notional Earth observing mission.

A better understanding of ecosystem processes requires accurate estimates of forest biomass and structure on global scales. Recently, there have been demonstrations of the ability of remote sensing instruments, such as radar and lidar, for the estimation of forest parameters from spaceborne platforms in a consistent manner. These advances can be exploited for global forest biomass accounting and structure characterization, leading to a better understanding of the global carbon cycle. The popular techniques for the estimation of forest parameters from radar instruments, in particular, use backscatter intensity, interferometry, and polarimetric interferometry. This paper analyzes the uncertainty in biomass estimates derived from single-season L-band cross-polarized (HV) radar backscatter over temperate forests of the Northeastern United States. An empirical approach is adopted, relying on ground-truth data collected during field campaigns over the Harvard and Howland Forests in 2009. The accuracy of field biomass estimates, including the impact of the diameter-biomass allometry, is characterized for the field sites. A single-season radar data set from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory's L-band Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar instrument is analyzed to assess the accuracy of the backscatter-biomass relationships with a theoretical radar error model.