Karl-Erik Eilertsen

Prof. Karl-Erik Eilertsen

UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Troms, Norway
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2014 in Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHanne K. Maehre
Hanne K. Maehre
MMMarian K Malde
Marian K Malde
KEKarl-Erik Eilertsen
Karl-Erik Eilertsen
EEEdel O Elvevoll
Edel O Elvevoll

1 September 2011 in Biotechnology Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RLRune Larsen
Rune Larsen
KEKarl-Erik Eilertsen
Karl-Erik Eilertsen
EEEdel O. Elvevoll
Edel O. Elvevoll

26 October 2016 in Marine Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHanne K. Maehre
Hanne K. Maehre
IJIda Jensen
Ida Jensen
KEKarl-Erik Eilertsen
Karl-Erik Eilertsen
Several common protein extraction protocols have been applied on seaweeds, but extraction yields have been limited. The aims of this study were to further develop and optimize existing extraction protocols and to examine the effect of enzymatic pre-treatment on bioaccessibility and extractability of seaweed proteins. Enzymatic pre-treatment of seaweed samples resulted in a three-fold increase in amino acids available for extraction. Combining enzymatic pre-treatment with alkaline extraction resulted in a 1.6-fold increase in the protein extraction yield compared to a standard alkaline extraction protocol. A simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model showed that enzymatic pre-treatment of seaweed increased the amount of amino acids available for intestinal absorption 3.2-fold. In conclusion, enzymatic pre-treatment of seaweeds is effective for increasing the amount of amino acids available for utilization and may thus be an effective means for increasing the utilization potential of seaweed proteins. However, both the enzymatic pre-treatment protocol and the protein extraction protocol need further optimization in order to obtain optimal cost-benefit and results from the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion model need to be confirmed in clinical models.

25 April 2015 in Journal of Applied Phycology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HMHanne K. Maehre
Hanne K. Maehre
GEGuro K. Edvinsen
Guro K. Edvinsen
KEKarl-Erik Eilertsen
Karl-Erik Eilertsen
EEEdel O. Elvevoll
Edel O. Elvevoll

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHanne K. Maehre
Hanne K. Maehre
IJIda Jensen
Ida Jensen
EEEdel O. Elvevoll
Edel O. Elvevoll
KEKarl-Erik Eilertsen
Karl-Erik Eilertsen
ω-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) have, since the 1970s, been associated with beneficial health effects. They are, however, prone to lipid peroxidation due to their many double bonds. Lipid peroxidation is a process that may lead to increased oxidative stress, a condition associated with adverse health effects. Recently, conflicting evidence regarding the health benefits of intake of n-3 from seafood or n-3 supplements has emerged. The aim of this review was thus to examine recent literature regarding health aspects of n-3 FA intake from fish or n-3 supplements, and to discuss possible reasons for the conflicting findings. There is a broad consensus that fish and seafood are the optimal sources of n-3 FA and consumption of approximately 2–3 servings per week is recommended. The scientific evidence of benefits from n-3 supplementation has diminished over time, probably due to a general increase in seafood consumption and better pharmacological intervention and acute treatment of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

1 December 2006 in Lipids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EEEdel O. Elvevoll
Edel O. Elvevoll
HBHarald Barstad
Harald Barstad
EBEinar S. Breimo
Einar S. Breimo
JBJan Brox
Jan Brox
KEKarl-Erik Eilertsen
Karl-Erik Eilertsen
BØBjarne Østerud
Bjarne Østerud