Zhijun Zhao

Dr. Zhijun Zhao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 June 2021 in Lab on a Chip
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Xue BaiXue Bai
Xue Bai
BSBin Song
Bin Song
ZCZiteng Chen
Ziteng Chen
WZWei Zhang
Wei Zhang
DCDixiao Chen
Dixiao Chen
Lin FengLin Feng
Lin Feng
Anticipating tumor metastasis by circulating tumor cells captured by acoustic microstreaming.

27 March 2018 in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YTYong-Qing Tong
Yong-Qing Tong
ZZZhijun Zhao
Zhijun Zhao
BLBei Liu
Bei Liu
ABAnyu Bao
Anyu Bao
HZHongyun Zheng
Hongyun Zheng
YLYan Li
Yan Li
Detecting an ALK fusion gene in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could provide evidence to guide individualized therapy. The 5′/3′ imbalance strategy for quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) was developed to detect ALK fusion genes in circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA) of NSCLC patients. This method was validated in patients with the ALK fusion gene confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). The amount of the ALK fusion gene detected by the new method ranged from 33.2 to 987.4, (mean 315.2), in the patients confirmed to have the ALK fusion gene (+). This is much higher than the amount of fusion gene detected in the patients who are negative for the ALK fusion gene (−). The amount detected in the ALK fusion gene (−) samples ranged from 0.36 to 13.04, (mean 4.58). In 188 NSCLC patients, the specificity and sensitivity of the method was compared to that of the FISH method. About 10.64% of the patients showed higher ALK fusion gene expression, and were classified as ALK fusion gene (+). This is identical to the percentage of patients detected by the FISH method to be ALK fusion gene (+). The cutoff value for diagnosis of ALK fusion (+) is 32.9 as determined by this method. A new RT-PCR method using a 5′/3′ imbalance strategy was developed, with high specificity and sensitivity, for detection of the ALK fusion gene in ctRNA of NSCLC patients. This method can rapidly detect ALK fusion genes in patients, which will be helpful for guiding targeted therapy, particularly the individualized usage of TKIs in these patients.

2 November 2020 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YTYong-Qing Tong
Yong-Qing Tong
ABAnyu Bao
Anyu Bao
HCHongbing Chen
Hongbing Chen
JHJingtao Huang
Jingtao Huang
ZLZhihua Lv
Zhihua Lv
YLYan Li
Yan Li
Background: The SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected positive again after discharged from hospital in some COVID-19 patients, with or without clinical symptoms such as fever or dry cough. Methods: 1008 severe COVID-19 patients, with SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive detected with the mixed specimen of nasopharyngeal swab and oropharyngeal swab by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), were selected to monitor SARS-CoV-2 RNA with the 12 types of specimens by RT-qPCR during hospitalization. All of 20 discharged cases with COVID-19 were selected to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in isolation period with 7 types of specimens by RT-qPCR before releasing the isolation period. Results: Of the enrolled 1008 severe patients, the nasopharyngeal swab specimens showed the highest positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (71.06%), followed by alveolar lavage fluid (66.67%), oropharyngeal swab (30.77%), sputum (28.53%), urine (16.30%), blood (12.5%), stool (12.21%), anal swab (11.22%) and corneal secretion (2.99%), and SARS-CoV-2 RNA couldn’t be detected in other types of specimen in this study. Of the 20 discharged cases during the isolation period, the positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was 30% (6/20): 2 cases were positive in sputum at the eighth and ninth day after discharge, respectively, 1 case was positive in nasopharynx swab at the sixth day after discharge, 1 case was positive in anal swab at the eighth day after discharge, and 1 case was positive in 3 specimens (nasopharynx swab, oropharynx swab and sputum) simultaneously at the fourth day after discharge, and no positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in other specimens including stool, urine and blood at the discharged patients. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 RNA should be detected in multiple specimens, such as nasopharynx swab, oropharynx swab, sputum, and if necessary, stool and anal swab specimens should be performed simultaneously at discharge when the patients were considered for clinical cure and before releasing the isolation period.

18 July 2020 in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GZGaohua Zhang
Gaohua Zhang
LZLin Zhu
Lin Zhu
YXYucong Xue
Yucong Xue
ZZZhijun Zhao
Zhijun Zhao
HLHonglin Li
Honglin Li
XZXuan Zhang
Xuan Zhang

8 March 2018 in American Journal of Audiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XHXuehu He
Xuehu He
XLXiuzhong Li
Xiuzhong Li
YGYaqi Guo
Yaqi Guo
YZYue Zhao
Yue Zhao
HDHui Dong
Hui Dong
ZZZhijun Zhao
Zhijun Zhao
Purpose: This study screens for deafness gene mutations in newborns in the Northwest China population. Method: The 9 sites of 4 common deafness genes ( GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A 4, and mt 12S rRNA ) were detected by bloodspot-based gene chip array in 2,500 newborns. Results: We detected mutations of the 4 genes in 101 (4.04%) newborns; particularly, 0.20% detected the double mutations. In the Hui population, 4.58% of the newborns tested positive for mutations, whereas 4.01% of Han newborns tested positive for mutations. The detective rates are as follows: 1.44% for GJB2 235delC, 1.08% for SLC26A4 IVS7-2A>G, 0.48% for GJB2 299 _300delAT, 0.28% for SLC26A4 2168A>G, 0.2% for mt 12S rRNA 1555A>G, and 0.16% for GJB3 538C>T. The 31.25% (5/16) of infants with GJB2 235delC, 50% (3/6) with GJB2 299_300delAT, and 25% (3/12) with SLC26A4 IVS7-2A>G showed abnormal hearing when tested; only 1 double mutation case received the hearing test, and this infant showed abnormality in both ears on the hearing test. Conclusions: High mutation rates in the common deafness genes were detected in newborns in Northwest China. Our study is helpful in understanding the deafness genomic epidemiology and also provides evidence for prenatal and postnatal care as well as policy making on population health in the region.

1 June 2025 in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiale Zhao
Jiale Zhao
XGXiahui Ge
Xiahui Ge
HLHailong Li
Hailong Li
GJGenfei Jing
Genfei Jing
WMWeirong Ma
Weirong Ma
JHJia Hou
Jia Hou
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a complex respiratory disorder, results from genetic and environmental factors. Uncovering its genetic basis is vital for diagnostics and treatment. Robust genetic analysis is essential to establish a causal link. Methods: Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation850 BeadChip in peripheral blood from 8 COPD patients and 8 healthy smoking controls. Differentially methylated genes (DMGs) were cross-analyzed with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset GSE38974 (23 COPD, 9 controls). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were utilized to identify COPD-associated hub genes. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis examined the causal relationship between hub genes and COPD. The expression of selected hub genes was validated through RT-qPCR (80 COPD, 62 controls), immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analyses (10 COPD and 10 controls). Results: We found 10,593 DMGs and 646 DEGs associated with COPD. These genes were compared with WGCNA module genes, and the Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network interaction diagram was drawn, thereby identifying five Hub genes: PPIB, HSPA2, PRPF19, FKBP10 and DOHH. The expression levels of DOHH, FKBP10, PPIB and PRPF19 are higher in COPD, while the expression level of HSPA2 is lower. MR results indicate a potential causal relationship between PRPF19, PPIB and COPD. RT-qPCR, immunohistochemistry and Western blot experiments verified that the expression of PRPF-19 and PPIB was up-regulated in peripheral blood and lung tissue, which was consistent with the results of bioinformatics analysis. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that PRPF19 and PPIB may serve as promising diagnostic biomarkers in COPD. Further studies are required to fully elucidate their roles in COPD pathogenesis.