Fay Helena Johnston

Dr. Fay Helena Johnston

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 1 Liverpool St, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2009 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid M.J.S. Bowman
David M.J.S. Bowman
JBJennifer K. Balch
Jennifer K. Balch
Paulo ArtaxoPaulo Artaxo
Paulo Artaxo
WBWilliam J. Bond
William J. Bond
JCJean M. Carlson
Jean M. Carlson
SPStephen J. Pyne
Stephen J. Pyne
Burn, Baby, Burn: Wildfires can have dramatic and devastating effects on landscapes and human structures and are important agents in environmental transformation. Their impacts on nonanthropocentric aspects of the environment, such as ecosystems, biodiversity, carbon reserves, and climate, are often overlooked. Bowman et al. (p. 481 ) review what is known and what is needed to develop a holistic understanding of the role of fire in the Earth system, particularly in view of the pervasive impact of fires and the likelihood that they will become increasingly difficult to control as climate changes.

1 September 2016 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CRColleen Reid
Colleen Reid
MBMichael Brauer
Michael Brauer
FJFay Helena Johnston
Fay Helena Johnston
MJMichael Jerrett
Michael Jerrett
JBJohn R. Balmes
John R. Balmes
CECatherine T. Elliott
Catherine T. Elliott
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

14 September 2011 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavid M.J.S. Bowman
David M.J.S. Bowman
JBJennifer Balch
Jennifer Balch
Paulo ArtaxoPaulo Artaxo
Paulo Artaxo
WBWilliam J Bond
William J Bond
MCMark A Cochrane
Mark A Cochrane
RWRobert Whittaker
Robert Whittaker
Humans and their ancestors are unique in being a fire-making species, but ‘natural’ (i.e. independent of humans) fires have an ancient, geological history on Earth. Natural fires have influenced biological evolution and global biogeochemical cycles, making fire integral to the functioning of some biomes. Globally, debate rages about the impact on ecosystems of prehistoric human-set fires, with views ranging from catastrophic to negligible. Understanding of the diversity of human fire regimes on Earth in the past, present and future remains rudimentary. It remains uncertain how humans have caused a departure from ‘natural’ background levels that vary with climate change. Available evidence shows that modern humans can increase or decrease background levels of natural fire activity by clearing forests, promoting grazing, dispersing plants, altering ignition patterns and actively suppressing fires, thereby causing substantial ecosystem changes and loss of biodiversity. Some of these contemporary fire regimes cause substantial economic disruptions owing to the destruction of infrastructure, degradation of ecosystem services, loss of life, and smoke-related health effects. These episodic disasters help frame negative public attitudes towards landscape fires, despite the need for burning to sustain some ecosystems. Greenhouse gas-induced warming and changes in the hydrological cycle may increase the occurrence of large, severe fires, with potentially significant feedbacks to the Earth system. Improved understanding of human fire regimes demands: (1) better data on past and current human influences on fire regimes to enable global comparative analyses, (2) a greater understanding of different cultural traditions of landscape burning and their positive and negative social, economic and ecological effects, and (3) more realistic representations of anthropogenic fire in global vegetation and climate change models. We provide an historical framework to promote understanding of the development and diversification of fire regimes, covering the pre-human period, human domestication of fire, and the subsequent transition from subsistence agriculture to industrial economies. All of these phases still occur on Earth, providing opportunities for comparative research.

18 August 2020 in Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDavid M.J.S. Bowman
David M.J.S. Bowman
CKCrystal Kolden
Crystal Kolden
JAJohn T. Abatzoglou
John T. Abatzoglou
FJFay Helena Johnston
Fay Helena Johnston
GWGuido R. van der Werf
Guido R. van der Werf
MFMike Flannigan
Mike Flannigan

1 May 2012 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FJFay Helena Johnston
Fay Helena Johnston
SHSarah B. Henderson
Sarah B. Henderson
YCYang Chen
Yang Chen
JRJames T. Randerson
James T. Randerson
MMMiriam Marlier
Miriam Marlier
MBMichael Brauer
Michael Brauer
Background: Forest, grass, and peat fires release approximately 2 petagrams of carbon into the atmosphere each year, influencing weather, climate, and air quality. Objective: We estimated the annual global mortality attributable to landscape fire smoke (LFS). Methods: Daily and annual exposure to particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) from fire emissions was estimated globally for 1997 through 2006 by combining outputs from a chemical transport model with satellite-based observations of aerosol optical depth. In World Health Organization (WHO) subregions classified as sporadically affected, the daily burden of mortality was estimated using previously published concentration–response coefficients for the association between short-term elevations in PM2.5 from LFS (contrasted with 0 μg/m3 from LFS) and all-cause mortality. In subregions classified as chronically affected, the annual burden of mortality was estimated using the American Cancer Society study coefficient for the association between long-term PM2.5 exposure and all-cause mortality. The annual average PM2.5 estimates were contrasted with theoretical minimum (counterfactual) concentrations in each chronically affected subregion. Sensitivity of mortality estimates to different exposure assessments, counterfactual estimates, and concentration–response functions was evaluated. Strong La Niña and El Niño years were compared to assess the influence of interannual climatic variability. Results: Our principal estimate for the average mortality attributable to LFS exposure was 339,000 deaths annually. In sensitivity analyses the interquartile range of all tested estimates was 260,000–600,000. The regions most affected were sub-Saharan Africa (157,000) and Southeast Asia (110,000). Estimated annual mortality during La Niña was 262,000, compared with 532,000 during El Niño. Conclusions: Fire emissions are an important contributor to global mortality. Adverse health outcomes associated with LFS could be substantially reduced by curtailing burning of tropical rainforests, which rarely burn naturally. The large estimated influence of El Niño suggests a relationship between climate and the burden of mortality attributable to LFS.

26 November 2020 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rongbin XuRongbin Xu
Rongbin Xu
PYPei Yu
Pei Yu
MAMichael J. Abramson
Michael J. Abramson
FJFay Helena Johnston
Fay Helena Johnston
JSJonathan M. Samet
Jonathan M. Samet
Yuming GuoYuming Guo
Yuming Guo
The world has already observed many devastating effects of human-induced climate change.1 A vivid manifestation is the several large wildfires that have occurred recently — in some cases, fires of unprecedented scale and duration — including wildfires in Australia in 2019 to 2020, the Amazon rainforest in Brazil in 2019 and 2020, the western United States in 2018 and 2020, and British Columbia, Canada, in 2017 and 2018. Since August of this year, record-breaking wildfires have burned 2.7 million hectares (as of September 18, 2020) along the West Coast of the United States, killing more than 30 people and leaving tens of thousands homeless.2 Robust projections indicate that the risk of wildfires will continue to increase in most areas of the world as climate change worsens3-6 and that the fires will increase excess mortality and morbidity from burns, wildfire smoke, and mental health effects.7-9