AIM: To determine whether the endoscopic transorbital (ETO) approach could be an alternative and a safer route to access the cavernous sinus (CS) lateral compartment. MATERIAL and METHODS: ETO technique was studied on 3 cadavers and 6 CSes of these cadavers. Endoscopic dissection was visualized with a 0-degree angle endoscope and recorded with fiberoptic cable, light source and camera system and digital video recording system. RESULTS: Superior orbital fissure (SOF), optic canal (OC), anterior ethmoidal artery (AEA) and posterior ethmoidal artery (PEA) foramens were visualized with periorbital dissection. Anterior wall of CS was reached after drilling the optic strut (OS). When the wall was opened, CS lateral and anteroinferior compartments were visualized. Internal carotid artery (ICA) were visualized from proximal ring to the last 2 cm of paraclival carotid artery. Cranial nerves (CNs) within the CS and the course of the interclinoid ligament were revealed. CONCLUSION: The transorbital endoscopic method is an alternative approach to other techniques for accessing the lateral and anteroinferior compartments of CS. The advantages, disadvantages and limitations of the technique have been determined.

Background/Objectives: Giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) pose significant surgical challenges due to their large size, parasellar/suprasellar extensions, and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Although the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is preferred for pituitary tumors, achieving gross total resection (GTR) in GPAs remains difficult. Additional transcranial approaches may improve resection rates while minimizing morbidity. This study evaluates the impact of endoscopic and combined surgical approaches on resection outcomes using a classification system previously defined in GPA patients treated over the past year. Methods: Among 517 pituitary adenomas treated in our clinic between September 2023 and September 2024, 49 GPA patients underwent endoscopic endonasal, transcranial, or combined surgery. Their medical records and surgical videos were retrospectively reviewed. Data included demographics, symptoms, imaging, surgical details, and follow-up outcomes. Tumor resection rates were analyzed based on the “landmark-based classification”, considering radiological and pathological features and surgical approach. Results: The mean age was 45.5 years (female/male: 14/35). Zone distribution was 8 (Zone 1), 21 (Zone 2), and 20 (Zone 3). GTR was achieved in 34.6%, near-total resection in 36.7%, and subtotal resection in 28.5%. Endoscopic surgery was performed in 41 patients, combined surgery in 7, and a transcranial approach in 1. Complications included diabetes insipidus (9/49), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (2/49), apoplexy (2/49), hypocortisolism (3/49), epidural hematoma (1/49), and epistaxis (1/49). Conclusions: While EEA is effective for Zone 1 and 2 GPAs, Zone 3 tumors often require combined or transcranial approaches for better resection. A multimodal strategy optimizes tumor removal while minimizing morbidity. Individualized surgical planning based on tumor classification is crucial for improving outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is the preferred approach for treating sellar and parasellar lesions due to its panoramic view and detailed anatomical definition. This study aims to review major arterial injuries during EES, a rare but critical complication associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted, including 15 patients from 5640 EES procedures performed between August 1997 and February 2024 at in our center/Department of Neurosurgery. The study focuses on perioperative and postoperative management strategies, highlighting the use of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel®)/gelatin-thrombin matrix (Floseal®) and multidisciplinary collaboration to achieve hemostasis. RESULTS: The incidence of major arterial injury was 0.2%, with a mean patient age of 38.4 years and a female-to-male ratio of 10:5. The most common tumors were adenomas (n = 7) and chordomas (n = 5). The most commonly bleeding arteries in 6 patients each are the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery and the paraclival carotid artery. Low-flow bleeding was observed in 10 of our patients, while high-flow bleeding was seen in 5 patients, 4 of whom were recurrent cases (P < .05). In 3 patients with high-flow bleeding from segments of the carotid artery, digital subtraction angiography was performed for stent placement or coil embolization, while in 1 patient with high-flow bleeding, digital subtraction angiography was used for monitoring cerebral blood flow. One of our patients died of a myocardial infarction at the 14th month of follow-up and 1 of our patients developed left-hemiparesis. CONCLUSION: The study underscores the importance of preoperative planning, surgical expertise, and multidisciplinary teamwork in managing major arterial injuries during EES. The authors advocate for the development of standardized treatment algorithms to improve outcomes in these patients. The findings contribute to the limited literature on managing internal carotid artery injuries in EES, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and algorithm development.