Kezia Gaitskell

Dr. Kezia Gaitskell

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2024 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMagda Marečková
Magda Marečková
LGLuz Garcia-Alonso
Luz Garcia-Alonso
MMMarie Moullet
Marie Moullet
VLValentina Lorenzi
Valentina Lorenzi
RPRobert Petryszak
Robert Petryszak
RVRoser Vento-Tormo
Roser Vento-Tormo
The complex and dynamic cellular composition of the human endometrium remains poorly understood. Previous endometrial single-cell atlases profiled few donors and lacked consensus in defining cell types. We introduce the Human Endometrial Cell Atlas (HECA), a high-resolution single-cell reference atlas (313,527 cells) combining published and new endometrial single-cell transcriptomics datasets of 63 women with and without endometriosis. HECA assigns consensus and identifies previously unreported cell types, mapped in situ using spatial transcriptomics and validated using a new independent single-nuclei dataset (312,246 nuclei, 63 donors). In the functionalis, we identify intricate stromal–epithelial cell coordination via transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling. In the basalis, we define signaling between fibroblasts and an epithelial population expressing progenitor markers. Integration of HECA with large-scale endometriosis genome-wide association study data pinpoints decidualized stromal cells and macrophages as most likely dysregulated in endometriosis. The HECA is a valuable resource for studying endometrial physiology and disorders, and for guiding microphysiological in vitro systems development.

1 February 2022 in Cancer Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKezia Gaitskell
Kezia Gaitskell
CHCarol Hermon
Carol Hermon
IBIsobel Barnes
Isobel Barnes
KPKirstin Pirie
Kirstin Pirie
SFSarah Floud
Sarah Floud
GRGillian K. Reeves
Gillian K. Reeves
Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in UK women. Ovarian cancer survival varies by disease stage at diagnosis, but evidence is mixed on the effect of tumour histological type (histotype) and other factors. 1.3 million UK women completed a detailed health questionnaire in 1996–2001 and were followed for incident cancers and deaths via linkage to national databases. Using Cox regression models, we estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) of death from ovarian cancer, by stage at diagnosis, tumour histotype, and 16 other personal characteristics of the women. During 17.7 years’ average follow-up, 13,222 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and 8697 of them died from the disease. Stage at diagnosis was a major determinant of survival (stage IV vs I, RR=10.54, 95% CI: 9.16–12.13). Histotype remained a significant predictor after adjustment for stage and other factors, but associations varied over the follow-up period. Histotype-specific survival was worse for high-grade than low-grade tumours. Survival appeared worse with older age at diagnosis (per 5 years: RR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.15–1.22), higher BMI (per 5-unit increase: RR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.02–1.11), and smoking (current vs never: RR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.07–1.27), but there was little association with 13 other pre-diagnostic reproductive, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Stage at diagnosis is a strong predictor of ovarian cancer survival, but tumour histotype and grade remain predictors of survival even after adjustment for stage and other factors, contributing further evidence of biological dissimilarity between the ovarian cancer histotypes. Obesity and smoking represent potentially-modifiable determinants of survival, but the stronger association with stage suggests that improving earlier diagnosis would have a greater impact on increasing ovarian cancer survival.

15 May 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKeren Papier
Keren Papier
JAJoshua R. Atkins
Joshua R. Atkins
TTTammy Tong
Tammy Tong
KGKezia Gaitskell
Kezia Gaitskell
TDTrishna Desai
Trishna Desai
RTRuth C. Travis
Ruth C. Travis
The availability of protein measurements and whole exome sequence data in the UK Biobank enables investigation of potential observational and genetic protein-cancer risk associations. We investigated associations of 1463 plasma proteins with incidence of 19 cancers and 9 cancer subsites in UK Biobank participants (average 12 years follow-up). Emerging protein-cancer associations were further explored using two genetic approaches, cis-pQTL and exome-wide protein genetic scores (exGS). We identify 618 protein-cancer associations, of which 107 persist for cases diagnosed more than seven years after blood draw, 29 of 618 were associated in genetic analyses, and four had support from long time-to-diagnosis ( > 7 years) and both cis-pQTL and exGS analyses: CD74 and TNFRSF1B with NHL, ADAM8 with leukemia, and SFTPA2 with lung cancer. We present multiple blood protein-cancer risk associations, including many detectable more than seven years before cancer diagnosis and that had concordant evidence from genetic analyses, suggesting a possible role in cancer development.

20 September 2017 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKezia Gaitskell
Kezia Gaitskell
JGJane Green
Jane Green
KPKirstin Pirie
Kirstin Pirie
IBIsobel Barnes
Isobel Barnes
CHCarol Hermon
Carol Hermon
VBValerie Beral
Valerie Beral
Ovarian cancer risk is known to be reduced amongst women who have had children, but reported associations with breastfeeding are varied. Few studies have had sufficient power to explore reliably these associations by tumour histotype. In a prospective study of 1.1 million UK women, 8719 developed ovarian cancer during follow‐up. Cox regression yielded adjusted relative risks (RRs) overall and by tumour histotype amongst women with different childbearing patterns. Nulliparous women had a 24% greater ovarian cancer risk than women with one child, with significant heterogeneity by histotype (p = 0.01). There was no significant increase in serous tumours, a modest increase in mucinous tumours, but a substantial increase in endometrioid (RR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.18‐1.89) and clear‐cell tumours (RR = 1.68, 1.29‐2.20). Among parous women, each additional birth was associated with an overall 6% reduction in ovarian cancer risk; this association also varied by histotype (p = 0.0006), with the largest reduction in risk for clear‐cell tumours (RR per birth = 0.75, 0.65‐0.85, p < 0.001) and weak, if any, effect for endometrioid, high‐grade serous, or mucinous tumours. We found little association with age at first or last birth. There was about a 10% risk reduction per 12‐months breastfeeding (RR = 0.89, 0.84‐0.94, p < 0.001), with no significant heterogeneity by histotype, but statistical power was limited. In this large prospective study, ovarian cancer risk associated with parity varied substantially by tumour histotype. Nulliparity was associated with a substantially greater overall risk than expected from the effect of a single birth, especially for clear cell and endometrioid tumours, perhaps suggesting that infertility is associated with these histotypes.

17 September 2015 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKezia Gaitskell
Kezia Gaitskell
JGJane Green
Jane Green
KPKirstin Pirie
Kirstin Pirie
GRGillian Reeves
Gillian Reeves
VCValerie Beral; on behalf of the Million Women Study Collaborators
Valerie Beral; on behalf of the Million Women Study Collaborators
Histopathological and molecular studies suggest that different histological subtypes (histotypes) of ovarian cancer have different aetiologies. Few studies have been large enough to explore reliably the effect of tubal ligation (sterilization), which has been associated with a reduced overall risk of ovarian cancer, on different tumour histotypes. In a prospective study of 1.1 million UK women without prior cancer or bilateral oophorectomy, 8,035 ovarian cancers occurred during mean follow‐up of 13.8 years. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we estimated adjusted relative risks of ovarian cancer associated with tubal ligation. Overall, there was substantial heterogeneity in tumour risk associated with tubal ligation for the four main histotypes, serous, endometrioid, mucinous and clear cell (heterogeneity: p < 0.0001). For serous tumours, the most common histotype (n = 3,515), risks differed significantly between high‐grade (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.89) and low‐grade tumours (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89–1.42); heterogeneity: p = 0.007. Relative risks were almost halved for endometrioid (n = 690, RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43–0.69) and clear cell tumours (n = 401, RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39–0.77), but there was no association between tubal ligation and mucinous tumours (n = 836, RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.84–1.18). For the main tumour histotypes we found little variation of risk by timing of tubal ligation. The significant differences by tumour histotype are unlikely to be due to confounding and are consistent with hypotheses that high‐grade and low‐grade serous tumours have different origins, and that some endometrioid and clear cell tumours might arise from cells and/or carcinogens travelling through the fallopian tubes.

13 June 2019 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTammy Tong
Tammy Tong
TKTimothy Key
Timothy Key
KGKezia Gaitskell
Kezia Gaitskell
TGTim Green
Tim Green
WGWenji Guo
Wenji Guo
Kathryn BradburyKathryn Bradbury
Kathryn Bradbury
There may be differences in hematological parameters between meat-eaters and vegetarians. The aim of this study was to perform cross-sectional analyses of hematological parameters by diet group in a large cohort in the United Kingdom. A complete blood count was carried out in all UK Biobank participants at recruitment (2006–2010). We examined hemoglobin, red and white blood cell counts, and platelet counts and volume in regular meat eaters (>3 times/wk of red/processed meat consumption, n = 212,831), low meat eaters (n = 213,092), poultry eaters (n = 4815), fish eaters (n = 10,042), vegetarians (n = 6548), and vegans (n = 398) of white ethnicity and meat eaters (n = 3875) and vegetarians (n = 1362) of British Indian ethnicity. In both white and British Indian populations, compared with regular meat eaters (or meat eaters in Indians), the other diet groups had up to 3.7% lower age-adjusted hemoglobin concentrations (difference not significant in white vegan women) and were generally more likely to have anemia (e.g., 8.7% of regular meat eaters compared with 12.8% of vegetarians in white premenopausal women; P < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction). In the white population, compared with regular meat eaters, all other diet groups had lower age- and sex-adjusted total white cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils (P-heterogeneity < 0.001 for all), but basophil counts were similar across diet groups; in British Indians, there was no significant difference in any of the white blood cell counts by diet group. Compared with white regular meat eaters, the low meat eaters, poultry eaters, fish eaters, and vegans had significantly lower platelet counts and higher platelet volume, whereas vegetarians had higher counts and lower volume. Compared with British Indian meat eaters, vegetarians had higher platelet count and lower volume. In the UK Biobank, people with low or no red meat intake generally had lower hemoglobin concentrations and were slightly more likely to be anemic. The lower white blood cell counts observed in low and non-meat eaters, and differences in mean platelet counts and volume between diet groups, warrant further investigation. This observational study was registered at http://www.isrctn.com/ as ISRCTN10125697.