Background. Physicomechanical properties and clinical service of bulk-fill composites depend on their adequate polymerization and depth of cure. Some manufacturers claim that these composites can be adequately cured when used in bulks exceeding 4 mm. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare Vickers microhardness (VMH) and depth of cure (DOC) of six contemporary bulk-fill resin composites at depths of 4 mm and 6 mm. Material and methods. Six bulk-fill composites were evaluated in this study: 1. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), (TEC); 2. Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (3M ESPE Dental Products Division, St. Paul, MN, USA), (FBF); 3. Filtek One Bulk Fill (3M ESPE Dental Products Division, St. Paul, MN, USA, (FOB); 4. SonicFill 2 (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), (SF2); 5. Admira Fusion X-tra (Voco, GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany), (AFX); 6. GrandioSO X-tra (Voco, GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany), (GSX). The 18 specimens (3 of each composite) were prepared in split Teflon moulds of 4 mm diameter and 6 mm thickness. All composites were cured in standard mode for 20 s using LED LCU (D-Light Duo, RF-Pharmaceuticals Sarl, Geneva, Switzerland; 1200–1300 mW/cm). The VMH was measured using a digital Micro Hardness Tester Shimadzu (HMV-2T E, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). A 50 g (0.5 N) load force was applied for 30 s. Each specimen was measured at five places selected by chance at each level (N = 15). The hardness ratio or DOC was calculated for all samples as the ratio of bottom and surface microhardness at levels of 4 and 6 mm. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results. Significant reduction in VMH was observed for all tested materials when comparing top surface and bottom (p < 0.01). The highest VMH was obtained for GSX and AFX, and the lowest for TEC. The results show that the degree of polymerization was adequate for all tested materials at a depth of 6 mm, since the hardness ratio exceeded 0.80 in all cases. The hardness ratio at 4 mm was high for all tested composites ranging from 0.91 for TEC to 0.98 for GSX. All composites showed adequate DOC at the bottom of the 6 mm bulk samples. However, the hardness ratio was the highest for Admira Fusion X-tra (0.96) and GrandioSO X-tra (0.97). Conclusions. All tested materials showed a significant decrease in microhardness from the top surface to the bottom. The DOC was adequate for all bulk-fill composites at a depth of 6 mm cured under standard mode for 20 s. All bulk-fill resin composites evaluated in this study can be used in bulk, up to 6 mm.

Traumatised immature permanent teeth with pulp necrosis pose a clinical challenge due to incomplete root development and limited treatment options. This retrospective observational study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of regenerative endodontic treatment (RET) incorporating an additional calcium hydroxide-based step for blood clot stabilisation compared with apexification in traumatised immature teeth. A total of 49 teeth treated between 2015 and 2025 were analysed. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and reassessed at 6- and 12-month follow-up, including root length, dentinal wall thickness, apical diameter, periapical status, and apical closure. RET was associated with significantly greater increases in dentinal wall thickness (p = 0.002), root length (p = 0.010), and reductions in apical diameter (p < 0.001) over time compared with apexification. Apical closure was observed significantly more frequently in the RET group (p < 0.001). Periapical healing improved in both groups, while overall clinical outcomes appeared broadly similar. Within the limitations of this retrospective observational study, RET incorporating an additional calcium hydroxide-based step for blood clot stabilisation appears to be a clinically applicable approach for promoting root development in traumatised immature teeth. Further prospective and controlled studies are required to confirm these findings and to better define the role of this adjunctive step.