Transplantation of cultured epidermal cell sheets (CES) has long been used to treat patients with burns, chronic wounds, and stable vitiligo. In patients with large area burns this can be a life-saving procedure. The ultimate goal, however, is to restore all normal functions of the skin and prevent scar formation. Increased focus on the incorporation of epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs) within CES transplants may ultimately prove to be key to achieving this. Transplanted EpiSCs contribute to restoring the complete epidermis and provide long-term renewal. Maintenance of the regenerative potential of EpiSCs is anchorage-dependent. The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides physical cues that are interpreted by EpiSCs and reciprocal signaling between cells and ECM are integrated to determine cell fate. Thus, the carrier scaffold chosen for culture and transplant influences maintenance of EpiSC phenotype and may enhance or detract from regenerative healing following transfer. Long-term effectiveness and safety of genetically modified EpiSCs to correct the severe skin blistering disease epidermolysis bullosa has been shown clinically. Furthermore, skin is gaining interest as an easily accessible source of adult epithelial stem cells potentially useful for restoration of other types of epithelia. This review highlights the role of EpiSCs in the current treatment of skin injury and disease, as well as their potential in novel regenerative medicine applications involving other epithelia.

Background: Reconstructive procedures with pedicled and free flaps are associated with a risk of ischemia. Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) is a hormone-like substance with known antiischemic and tissue-protective effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of PGE1 on the microcirculation in random pattern skin flaps on rats. Methods: Twenty-four rats were divided into 2 groups: an intervention group given PGE1 for 6 hours and a control group given saline. The flap (2 × 10 cm) was created on the back of the rats, and the microcirculation was monitored with laser Doppler perfusion imaging in 5 different zones (1, proximal; 5, distal) before surgery and after 60, 180, and 360 minutes postoperatively. Results: Before surgery, there was no difference in the perfusion in any zones between the intervention group and the control group. The mean perfusion values in zone 1 in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 60, 180, and 360 minutes postoperatively (P = 0.02, P = 0.05, and P = 0.04, respectively). At 360 minutes, we also found significantly higher levels of perfusion in the intervention group in zones 4 and 5 (P = 0.05 and P = 0.03, respectively) compared with the controls. Comparing the perfusion at 360 to 60 minutes in the intervention group, we found a significant increase in microcirculation in all zones, which were not seen in the control group. Conclusion: PGE1 increased perfusion in the dermal random pattern flaps on rats.

Background: Upper eyelid blepharoplasty is one of the most common aesthetic surgeries performed worldwide. The procedure consists of removing excess skin with or without muscle and/or fat from the upper eyelid by a transcutaneous approach and placement of a supratarsal crease. The surgery is performed in a cosmetically sensitive area and every attempt to avoid poor scar formation should be made. Methods: This review presents a conspectus of the existing medical literature regarding scar-avoiding strategies in upper blepharoplasty with the aim of contributing to the reduction in postoperative scar formation. The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched on 2 September 2025. Results: The search yielded a total of 562 records, and, following screening, eleven publications were included. Conclusions: A systematic approach to pre-, intra-, and postoperative measures to minimize scarring are presented. There is a need to standardize scar assessment and reporting to facilitate inter-study comparison of effects, as well as prospective, randomized studies comparing suture materials and techniques.

Background: Despite the rise of endoscopic approaches, the direct brow lift remains one of the most effective procedures for correcting brow ptosis for both functional and cosmetic indications. It continues to offer superior control when correcting brow shape, height, and asymmetry. However, visible scarring remains a concern. This systematic review was conducted to synthesize recent evidence on strategies that minimize visible scarring in direct brow lift surgery. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to retrieve English-language publications from the past decade, discussing scar-minimization strategies in direct brow lift. A total of 124 records were identified through database searches in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase. Records were screened manually according to predetermined criteria, and those not in English, not addressing scarring, or not focused on direct brow lift were excluded. After this process, ten publications were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Results: The qualitative synthesis of all included publications (together comprising data on approximately 900 patients) revealed several strategies for scar minimization. (1) Incision beveling: A shallow cranially directed bevel between 20° and 45° preserves brow hair follicles and allows hair regrowth through the scar, providing natural camouflage. (2) Undermining: Gentle subcutaneous undermining in a limited 1–2 cm field, while preserving subcutaneous fat, allows tension-free advancement and maintains brow volume. (3) Periosteal suspension: Anchoring the mobilized brow flap to the frontal periosteum redistributes tension away from the dermal closure, maintaining elevation and improving scar quality. (4) Layered closure: Two- or three-layered wound closure with deep dermal anchoring and fine everting skin sutures minimizes dermal traction and scar widening. (5) Adjunctive measures: Evidence for topical silicone gel was inconclusive, whereas postoperative laser therapy and perioperative neuromodulator use demonstrated improved scar appearance. Across studies, outcomes were consistent, with high patient satisfaction, inconspicuous scars in over 85% of cases, and low complication or revision rates. Conclusions: Direct brow lift has historically been criticized for conspicuous scarring, contributing to the popularity of endoscopic techniques. Nevertheless, the traditional direct brow lift remains a fundamental skill in the oculofacial plastic surgeon’s armamentarium, offering unmatched accuracy in brow repositioning, reliability, and symmetry. Contemporary evidence demonstrates refinements that can markedly minimize scar visibility. This systematic review and qualitative synthesis allow us to continue to refine and improve our techniques to minimize scarring in direct brow lift to the benefit of our patients.