Curtiss Jennifer

Dr. Curtiss Jennifer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2009 in Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DODavid D. O'KEefe
David D. O'KEefe
EGEduardo Gonzalez-Niño
Eduardo Gonzalez-Niño
MBMicheal Burnett
Micheal Burnett
LDLayne Dylla
Layne Dylla
SLStacey M. Lambeth
Stacey M. Lambeth
CJCurtiss Jennifer
Curtiss Jennifer

16 April 2007 in Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CJCurtiss Jennifer
Curtiss Jennifer
MBMicheal Burnett
Micheal Burnett
MMMarek Mlodzik
Marek Mlodzik

31 August 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LNLandry E. Nfonsam
Landry E. Nfonsam
CCCarlos Cano
Carlos Cano
JMJoann Mudge
Joann Mudge
FSFaye D. Schilkey
Faye D. Schilkey
CJCurtiss Jennifer
Curtiss Jennifer
Tissue-specific transcription factors are thought to cooperate with signaling pathways to promote patterned tissue specification, in part by co-regulating transcription. The Drosophila melanogaster Pax6 homolog Eyeless forms a complex, incompletely understood regulatory network with the Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic and Notch signaling pathways to control eye-specific gene expression. We report a combinatorial approach, including mRNAseq and microarray analyses, to identify targets co-regulated by Eyeless and Hedgehog, Decapentaplegic or Notch. Multiple analyses suggest that the transcriptomes resulting from co-misexpression of Eyeless+signaling factors provide a more complete picture of eye development compared to previous efforts involving Eyeless alone: (1) Principal components analysis and two-way hierarchical clustering revealed that the Eyeless+signaling factor transcriptomes are closer to the eye control transcriptome than when Eyeless is misexpressed alone; (2) more genes are upregulated at least three-fold in response to Eyeless+signaling factors compared to Eyeless alone; (3) based on gene ontology analysis, the genes upregulated in response to Eyeless+signaling factors had a greater diversity of functions compared to Eyeless alone. Through a secondary screen that utilized RNA interference, we show that the predicted gene CG4721 has a role in eye development. CG4721 encodes a neprilysin family metalloprotease that is highly up-regulated in response to Eyeless+Notch, confirming the validity of our approach. Given the similarity between D. melanogaster and vertebrate eye development, the large number of novel genes identified as potential targets of Ey+signaling factors will provide novel insights to our understanding of eye development in D. melanogaster and humans.

20 August 2010 in Developmental Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChinh Q. Hoang
Chinh Q. Hoang
MBMicheal E. Burnett
Micheal E. Burnett
CJCurtiss Jennifer
Curtiss Jennifer
Specification factors regulate cell fate in part by interacting with transcriptional co‐regulators like CtBP to regulate gene expression. Here, we demonstrate that CtBP forms a complex or complexes with the Drosophila melanogaster Pax6 homolog Eyeless (Ey), and with Distal antenna (Dan), Distal antenna related (Danr), and Dachshund to promote eye and antennal specification. Phenotypic analysis together with molecular data indicate that CtBP interacts with Ey to prevent overproliferation of eye precursors. In contrast, CtBP,dan,danr triple mutant adult eyes have significantly fewer ommatidia than CtBP single or dan,danr double mutants, suggesting that the CtBP/Dan/Danr complex functions to recruit ommatidia from the eye precursor pool. Furthermore, CtBP single and to a greater extent CtBP,dan,danr triple mutants affect the establishment and maintenance of the R8 precursor, which is the founding ommatidial cell. Thus, CtBP interacts with different eye specification factors to regulate gene expression appropriate for proliferative vs. differentiative stages of eye development. Developmental Dynamics 239:2367–2385, 2010.

1 September 2012 in Developmental Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DODavid D. O'Keefe
David D. O'Keefe
EGEduardo Gonzalez-Niño
Eduardo Gonzalez-Niño
BEBruce A. Edgar
Bruce A. Edgar
CJCurtiss Jennifer
Curtiss Jennifer

22 January 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSurya Banerjee
Surya Banerjee
CWChristine Woods
Christine Woods
MBMicheal Burnett
Micheal Burnett
SPScarlet J. Park
Scarlet J. Park
WJWilliam W. Ja
William W. Ja
CJCurtiss Jennifer
Curtiss Jennifer
The prototypical M13 peptidase, human Neprilysin, functions as a transmembrane “ectoenzyme” that cleaves neuropeptides that regulate e.g. glucose metabolism, and has been linked to type 2 diabetes. The M13 family has undergone a remarkable, and conserved, expansion in the Drosophila genus. Here, we describe the function of Drosophila melanogaster Neprilysin-like 15 (Nepl15). Nepl15 is likely to be a secreted protein, rather than a transmembrane protein. Nepl15 has changes in critical catalytic residues that are conserved across the Drosophila genus and likely renders the Nepl15 protein catalytically inactive. Nevertheless, a knockout of the Nepl15 gene reveals a reduction in triglyceride and glycogen storage, with the effects likely occurring during the larval feeding period. Conversely, flies overexpressing Nepl15 store more triglycerides and glycogen. Protein modeling suggests that Nepl15 is able to bind and sequester peptide targets of catalytically active Drosophila M13 family members, peptides that are conserved in humans and Drosophila, potentially providing a novel mechanism for regulating the activity of neuropeptides in the context of lipid and carbohydrate homeostasis.