Background/Aim. There are various opinions regarding the factors motivating women to undergo breast augmentation. The aim of this study was to estimate motivation for augmentation mammaplasty (AM), self-esteem and body image perception in breast augmentation patients. Methods. This prospective study involved AM patients operated in the Clinical Center of Vojvodina during a 3-year period. A total of 45 patients responded to our package of questionnaires designed to assess motivation for surgery, self-esteem level and body image perception. Those patients were compared to the control group of women who did not want to change their breast size, and who were similar in their age, social status and education level. Our package of questionnaires included a general questionnaire, Photographic Figure Rating Scale (PFRS) and Rosenberg?s Self-Esteem Scale. Results. Differences in marital status, educational level, habitation and employment status were statistically insignificant, but there was a significantly lower body mass index (BMI) in the operated women. Considering motives for surgery, a few factors were distinguished: desire to feel more feminine (82.2%), confident (75.5%) and attractive (73.3%), to feel less shy with men (64.4%), to improve their sex life (46.5%), teasing history (42.2%) and easier to find a partner (11.1%) and job (2.2%). Both groups demonstrated a high self-esteem level, but in the AM group results were lower than in the control group. The mean current self-rating by the PFRS in the group AM was lower than in the control group (4.28 ? 1.3 vs 5.12 ? 1.23, respectively) and this coincided with lower BMI in the AM group. The women in the AM group had chosen significantly smaller body size as maximally attractive, and had chosen a narrower attractive body size range than the women in the control group. Conclusion. Preoperative evaluation of patients? motives for surgery can help surgeons to exclude woman with unrealistic expectations and different psychological problems.
Introduction: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a rare type of cancer in which more than 50% of the tumor is composed of extracellular mucin and malignant epithelial cells. MACs account for only 1.8% of all breast cancer cases. Most breast cancers present as localized diseases and are well-differentiated. Breast MAC has a better 5- and 10-year survival rate than ductal and lobular carcinomas. Distant metastasis in breast MAC is rare, especially in the oral cavity. Only 1% of all oral malignancies present with metastases to the oral cavity. The bony structures are more involved than the soft tissues. Involvement of the oral soft tissue is rare, accounting for less than 0.1% of oral metastases. Case description: This report describes a rare case of mucinous breast adenocarcinoma with metastasis to the mandibular molar region. Diagnosis was established based on anamnesis, clinical presentation, tumor biopsy, computed tomography, mammography, and core biopsy of the breast tumor. The patient was sent to the oncology committee for breast disease where chemotherapy was indicated. Discussion: The clinical presentation of oral metastasis is not pathognomonic, and pyogenic granuloma, periodontal abscesses, sarcomas, and squamous carcinoma must be considered in the differential diagnosis. This is a rare case of oral metastasis of breast MAC, which was indicated for detection of the primary tumor.
Background/Aim. Despite all innovations in medicine, melanoma still has a rising incidence and high mortality and thus represents a significant challenge for the healthcare system. The pandemic of the coronavirus dis-ease 2019 (COVID-19), spanning three years, redirected healthcare resources, suspended preventive programs, and strained the healthcare system, significantly impacting melanoma management. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of melanoma patients. Methods. This retrospective study analyzed melanoma patients treated at a single tertiary care center over two distinct three-year periods: pre-COVID period (2017?2020) and the COVID-19 pandemic period (2020?2022). The following data were collected and compared: patient demographics, melanoma characteristics, time intervals from biopsy to surgery, and the share of thin and thick melanoma. Results. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, there was a 3 0% reduction in melanoma patients compared to the pre-COVID- 19 period. The decline was most pronounced in 2020 when the state of emergency was introduced in the country. Thin melanoma percentage as a measurement of successful screening programs decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic (11.57% vs. 24.01%), while median Breslow thickness remained stable. The distribution of different histological types was consistent across both periods. The average time from biopsy to surgery remained similar between the two periods, around 40 days. Conclusion. Despite challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, melanoma remains a critical healthcare issue. This study emphasized the significance of prioritizing melanoma care in emergencies, ensuring patient identification and timely treatment in order to optimize survival and minimize treatment costs.
Introduction. Saber-sheath trachea is a rare malformation of the trachea marked with coronal narrowing with concomitant widening of sagittal diameter, with a sagittal-to-coronal diameter ratio exceeding 2:1. As tracheal rings are stiff and do not collapse around the tube, the intubation is difficult. Case Report. A 53-year-old female was referred to our hospital due to failed intubation at the local hospital during a planned surgery of skin melanoma. The patient was scheduled for surgery in our hospital, her case was presented to a panel of anesthesiologists and she was prepared for surgery. The intubation failed again, even though a video-assisted laryngoscope and endotracheal tube with 5 mm internal diameter was used. The anesthesiologist noticed that the endotracheal tube entered the trachea only 2 cm due to strong resistance, so further intubation was not an option in order to avoid damaging the trachea. The surgery was performed in local anesthesia with analgosedation. Later on, computed tomography was done, because of suspected pathological process compressing trachea, but the radiologist described the anomaly as saber-sheath trachea. One year later, the patient presented with axillary lymph node metastases and needed another surgery. This time the anesthesiologist knew about the trachea malformation, anticipated difficult intubation and used i-gelTM for airway management. Conclusion. Despite the fact that numerous methods have been developed for the purpose of identifying patients at risk of difficult intubation, there are many unexpected airway pathologies that can lead to failed intubation. Adequate preoperative assessment, knowledge of Guidelines for Difficult Intubation Management, availability of supraglottic airway devices, and cooperation between the surgeon and anesthesiologist, are crucial to successful patient management.
Prehabilitation represents a proactive, multimodal strategy to enhance patient resilience prior to plastic and reconstructive surgery, building on the success of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. This narrative review synthesizes the conceptual framework of prehabilitation—encompassing exercise training, nutritional optimization, risk factor modification, and psychological preparation—and examines its current application within plastic surgery. While evidence from selected randomized trials and systematic reviews in orthopedic and colorectal surgery suggests potential reductions in complications (often in the range of 20–40% in higher-risk populations), the results remain heterogeneous and context-dependent. To date, there have been no randomized controlled trials on plastic surgery, despite unique patient populations facing modifiable risks, including smoking, obesity, and malnutrition. This review proposes a risk-stratified prehabilitation framework tailored to key plastic surgery domains: breast reconstruction, head-and-neck microsurgery, post-bariatric body contouring, and major esthetic procedures. Practical implementation strategies address timelines, multidisciplinary teams, and digital delivery tools. By positioning prehabilitation as a structured preoperative component within ERAS pathways, plastic surgeons may support better perioperative readiness, potentially influencing complications, recovery, and patient experience. This review proposes conceptual frameworks intended to guide structured evaluation and future clinical research in plastic surgery.
Introduction. Hand injuries are among the most frequently treated conditions in plastic surgery. Suboptimal management can lead to prolonged healing, complications, significant morbidity, and severe disability. This study aimed to evaluate gender differences in the mechanisms, etiology, physical impairments, and post-traumatic stress symptoms associated with hand and forearm injuries following treatment. Material and Methods. This study included 101 patients with hand injuries treated at the Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinical Center of Vojvodina in Novi Sad, between 2020 and 2023. Data collected encompassed age, gender, education level, injury mechanism, hospitalization duration, defect reconstruction type, number of surgical procedures, and the Modified Hand Injury Severity Score. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the Short Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Rating Interview Score were calculated through telephone interviews. Results. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 37.8 in men, and 55.7 in women, while the mean Short Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Rating Interview Score was 8.6 in men and 12.1 in women. The mean Modified Hand Injury Severity Score was 47.1 in men and 43.2 in women. Conclusion. Women exhibited significantly higher Quick Disabilities the of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Short Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Rating Interview Score scores than men, indicating greater physical impairments and an elevated risk of posttraumatic stress disorder following injuries. Additionally, circular saw injuries emerged as the most common injury mechanism.