Abbie Goldberg

Dr. Abbie Goldberg

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Journal of Counseling Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAbbie Goldberg
Abbie Goldberg
JSJuliAnna Z. Smith
JuliAnna Z. Smith
This is the first study to examine change in depression and anxiety across the first year of adoptive parenthood in same-sex couples (90 couples: 52 lesbian, 38 gay male). Given that sexual minorities uniquely contend with sexual orientation-related stigma, this study examined how both internalized and enacted forms of stigma affect the mental health of lesbians and gay men during the transition to parenthood. In addition, the role of contextual support was examined. Higher perceived workplace support, family support, and relationship quality were related to lower depressive and anxious symptoms at the time of the adoption, and higher perceived friend support was related to lower anxiety symptoms. Lower internalized homophobia and higher perceived neighborhood gay-friendliness were related to lower depressive symptoms. Finally, individuals with high internalized homophobia who lived in states with unfavorable legal climates regarding gay adoption experienced the steepest increases in depressive and anxious symptoms. Findings have important implications for counselors working with sexual minorities, especially those experiencing the transition to parenthood.

3 June 2013 in Journal of Family Theory & Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAbbie Goldberg
Abbie Goldberg

13 July 2012 in Journal of Marriage and Family
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAbbie Goldberg
Abbie Goldberg
JSJuliAnna Smith
JuliAnna Smith
MPMaureen Perry‐Jenkins
Maureen Perry‐Jenkins

19 June 2018 in Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAbbie Goldberg
Abbie Goldberg
GBGenny Beemyn
Genny Beemyn
JSJuliAnna Smith
JuliAnna Smith
This mixed-methods study of 507 trans and gender-nonconforming students (75% undergraduate, 25% graduate) aimed to understand (a) what institutional factors are associated with the presence of more trans-inclusive policies/supports, (b) what trans-inclusive policies/supports are viewed as important by different groups of trans students, and (c) how the presence of such policies/supports is related to trans students’ sense of belonging on campus and their perception of campus climate. Results indicated that religiously affiliated institutions and two-year institutions tend to lag behind in their inclusivity of trans students. Gender-inclusive restrooms, nondiscrimination policies that are inclusive of gender identity, and the ability to change one’s name on campus records without legal name change were among the supports that students valued most. Students articulated many concrete suggestions for institutions seeking to be more inclusive of their trans students. The known presence of trans-inclusive policies/supports was related to a greater sense of belonging and more positive perceptions of campus climate. These findings provide consultants and practitioners with guidance in identifying and promoting systems-level changes needed to support trans students.

14 January 2015 in Journal of Marriage and Family
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGAbbie Goldberg
Abbie Goldberg
KAKatherine R. Allen
Katherine R. Allen

1 April 2007 in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAbbie Goldberg
Abbie Goldberg
MPMaureen Perry-Jenkins
Maureen Perry-Jenkins
No research has examined the division of labor across the transition to parenthood for same-sex couples. The current study examined the division of labor in 29 lesbian couples (58 women) during the transition to parenthood. Women were interviewed during their last trimester and 3—4 months post-natally. Two theoretical approaches — gender theory and economic theory — were used to generate competing hypotheses about the findings. Results revealed that couples divided housework quite equally; however, biological mothers tended to contribute more to child care. Despite this, the majority of couples did not perceive the biological mother as the more `primary' parent. Results highlight both the utility and limitations of current theories for explaining the division of labor in lesbian couples.