Objective: EEG patterns and quantitative EEG (qEEG) features have been poorly explored in monogenic epilepsies. Herein, we investigate regional differences in EEG frequency composition in patients with STXBP1 developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (STXBP1‐DEE).Methods: We conducted a retrospective study collecting electroclinical data of patients with STXBP1‐DEE and two control groups of patients with DEEs of different etiologies and typically developing individuals matched for age and sex. We performed a (1) visual EEG assessment, (b) qEEG analysis, and (c) electrical source imaging (ESI). We quantified the relative power (RP) of four frequency bands (α β, θ, δ), in two electrode groups (anterior/posterior), and compared their averages and dynamics (standard deviation [SD] over time). The ESI was performed by applying the standard Distributed Source Modeling algorithm.Results: We analyzed 42 EEG studies in 19 patients with STXBP1‐DEE (10 female), with a median age at recordings of 9.6 years (range 9 months to 29 years). The δRP was higher in recordings of STXBP1‐DEE (p < .001) compared to both control groups, suggesting the pathogenicity and STXBP1‐specificity of these findings. In STXBP1‐DEE, the δRP was significantly higher in the anterior electrode group compared to the posterior one (p = .003). There was no correlation between the anterior δRP and the epilepsy focus, age at recordings, and concomitant medications The ESI modeling of this activity showed a widespread involvement of the dorsomesial frontal cortex, suggesting a large corticosubcortical pathologic network. Finally, we identified two groups of recordings: cluster.1 with higher anterior δRP and low dynamics and cluster.2 with lower δRP and higher dynamics. Patients in cluster.1 had a more severe epilepsy and neurological phenotype compared to patients in cluster 2.Significance: The qEEG analysis showed a predominant frontal slow activity as a specific STXBP1 feature that correlates with the severity of the phenotype and may represent a biomarker for prospective longitudinal studies of STXBP1‐DEE.

Background: Stress-related disorders, including PTSD, acute stress disorders, adjustment disorder, and attachment disorders, arise from complex interactions between genetic susceptibility and environmental stressors. While early environmental factors play a central role in the development of these disorders, there is growing evidence that genetic predisposition also contributes to individual differences in vulnerability and resilience. This narrative review examines current evidence on genetic predisposition and resilience mechanisms in stress-related psychopathology during developmental age. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, MedRxiv, and Medline databases, focusing on studies published between 2010 and 2025, written in English, in the pediatric and adolescent population. Priority was given to original research articles and high-impact reviews. Studies were selected based on relevance to the genetic mechanisms underlying vulnerability and resilience to stress. 71 of 317 were selected. Two hundred forty-six articles were excluded due to a lack of relevance to the topic or because they included an adult population. Results: Polymorphisms and epigenetic modifications in genes involved in hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis (FKBP5, NR3C1, ADCYAP1R1 and ACE), serotoninergic (SLC6A4 and HTR2A), noradrenergic and dopaminergic system (COMT and MAOA), BDNF, estrogen receptor and excitatory amino acid transporters are associated with increased risk of psychopathology following early trauma, but are also implicated in the development of resilience. Conclusions: Genetic factors influence both vulnerability and resilience to stress-related disorders. However, further studies based on the role of genetics are needed to advance precision and personalized medicine, which is still largely underexplored to this day in the field of stress-induced disorders.

Pathogenic variants in SCN8A are associated with a broad phenotypic spectrum, including Self‐Limiting Familial Infantile Epilepsy (SeLFIE), characterized by infancy‐onset age‐related seizures with normal development and cognition. Movement disorders, particularly paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia typically arising after puberty, may represent another core symptom. We present the case of a 1‐year‐old girl with a familial disposition to self‐limiting focal seizures from the maternal side and early‐onset orofacial movement disorders associated with SCN8A‐SeLFIE. Brain MRI was normal. Genetic testing revealed a maternally inherited SCN8A variant [c.4447G > A; p.(Glu1483Lys)]. After the introduction of valproic acid, she promptly achieved seizure control as well as complete remission of strabismus and a significant decrease in episodes of tongue deviation. Family history, genetic findings, and epilepsy phenotype are consistent with SCN8A‐SeLFIE. Movement disorders are an important part of the SCN8A phenotypic spectrum, and this case highlights the novel early‐onset orofacial movement disorders associated with this condition. The episodes of tongue deviation and protrusion suggest focal oromandibular (lingual) dystonia. Additionally, while infantile strabismus or esophoria is a common finding in healthy individuals, our case raises the possibility of an ictal origin of the strabismus. This study underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing movement disorders in SCN8A‐SeLFIE patients, particularly the rare early‐onset orofacial manifestations. It adds to the growing body of knowledge regarding the diverse clinical presentations of SCN8A‐associated disorders and suggests potential avenues for clinical management and further research.

Background: Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) are a group of enzymes responsible for the first step of protein translation. Among them, the KARS1 gene encodes lysyl-tRNA synthetase 1, an enzyme essential for charging tRNA-Lys with lysine in both the cytoplasm and mitochondria. Mutations in KARS1 are associated with a wide range of clinical phenotypes, including leukoencephalopathy, hereditary deafness, peripheral neuropathies, and multisystemic involvement. Methods: We hereby report a detailed case study of a 15-month-old boy presenting at age 5 months with developmental delay, microcephaly, hypotonia, sensorineural deafness, retinopathy, visual impairment, nystagmoid eye movements, and hepatic and immuno-hematological abnormalities. In addition, he exhibited a severe hyperkinetic movement disorder, not previously reported in the literature, and developed epilepsy at 13 months. Genetic testing identified two rare compound heterozygous variants in the KARS1 gene. Results: With this report, we aim to contribute to the expanding of both the clinical phenotype and the allelic spectrum of lysyl-tRNA synthetase-related disorders. Our study also includes a review of previously described KARS1 cases presenting with movement disorders. Conclusions: Our findings further highlight the importance of assessing systemic involvement and performing brain and spinal neuroimaging, as well as implementing genetic screening, in infants presenting with global developmental delay, sensory deficits, and movement disorders—features that may suggest a mitochondrial disorder such as those involving ARS mutations.