Long-term sequelae may occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We comprehensively assessed organ-specific functions in individuals after mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with controls from the general population. Four hundred and forty-three mainly non-hospitalized individuals were examined in median 9.6 months after the first positive SARS-CoV-2 test and matched for age, sex, and education with 1328 controls from a population-based German cohort. We assessed pulmonary, cardiac, vascular, renal, and neurological status, as well as patient-related outcomes. Bodyplethysmography documented mildly lower total lung volume (regression coefficient −3.24, adjusted P = 0.014) and higher specific airway resistance (regression coefficient 8.11, adjusted P = 0.001) after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cardiac assessment revealed slightly lower measures of left (regression coefficient for left ventricular ejection fraction on transthoracic echocardiography −0.93, adjusted P = 0.015) and right ventricular function and higher concentrations of cardiac biomarkers (factor 1.14 for high-sensitivity troponin, 1.41 for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, adjusted P ≤ 0.01) in post-SARS-CoV-2 patients compared with matched controls, but no significant differences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings. Sonographically non-compressible femoral veins, suggesting deep vein thrombosis, were substantially more frequent after SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio 2.68, adjusted P < 0.001). Glomerular filtration rate (regression coefficient −2.35, adjusted P = 0.019) was lower in post-SARS-CoV-2 cases. Relative brain volume, prevalence of cerebral microbleeds, and infarct residuals were similar, while the mean cortical thickness was higher in post-SARS-CoV-2 cases. Cognitive function was not impaired. Similarly, patient-related outcomes did not differ. Subjects who apparently recovered from mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection show signs of subclinical multi-organ affection related to pulmonary, cardiac, thrombotic, and renal function without signs of structural brain damage, neurocognitive, or quality-of-life impairment. Respective screening may guide further patient management. The key question is: How does a mild to moderate course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mainly non-hospitalized individuals impact intermediate-term organ-specific functions in comparison to the general population? The key findings are (i) a mild to moderate course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with subsequent signs of subclinical multi-organ affection; (ii) associations mainly affect the pulmonary, cardiac, coagulation, and renal system; and (iii) no systematic associations with structural brain damage, neurocognition, or quality of life were observed. The take-home message is systematic screening of multi-organ function even after mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection is recommended to identify individuals at risk and initiate appropriate preventive therapies.

Coffee, next to water the most widespread beverage, is attributed both harmful and protective characteristics concerning cardiovascular health. This study aimed to evaluate associations of coffee consumption with cardiac biomarkers, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic parameters and major cardiovascular diseases. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 9009 participants of the population-based Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS), enrolled between 2016 and 2018 median age 63 [IQR: 55; 69] years. Coffee consumption was classified into three groups: < 3 cups/day (low), 3–4 cups/day (moderate), > 4 cups/day (high). In linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and additives, high coffee consumption correlated with higher LDL-cholesterol (β = 5.92; 95% CI 2.95, 8.89; p < 0.001). Moderate and high coffee consumption correlated with lower systolic (β = − 1.91; 95% CI − 3.04, − 0.78; p = 0.001; high: β = − 3.06; 95% CI − 4.69, − 1.44; p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (β = − 1.05; 95% CI − 1.67, − 0.43; p = 0.001; high: β = − 1.85; 95% CI − 2.74, − 0.96; p < 0.001). Different levels of coffee consumption did neither correlate with any investigated electrocardiographic or echocardiographic parameter nor with prevalent major cardiovascular diseases, including prior myocardial infarction and heart failure. In this cross-sectional analysis, high coffee consumption correlated with raised LDL-cholesterol levels and lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure. However, major cardiovascular diseases including heart failure and its diagnostic precursors were not associated with coffee consumption, connoting a neutral role of coffee in the context of cardiovascular health.

Aims: Data on the association between periodontitis and preclinical cardiac alterations remain scarce. The aim of the current study is to determine if periodontitis is associated with morphological and functional cardiac changes measured by transthoracic echocardiography as well as different heart failure (HF) phenotypes. Methods: Participants from the population-based Hamburg City Health Study [ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03934957)], who underwent transthoracic echocardiography and periodontal screening were included. Periodontitis was classified according to Eke and Page (none/mild, moderate, severe). The 2021 ESC HF guidelines were applied and HF was classified into HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, ejection fraction ≥50%), HF with mid-range and reduced ejection fraction [HF(m)rEF, ejection fraction <50%], and HF in general [HFpEF and HF(m)rEF]. Due to limited size, all subjects with LVEF <50% and symptoms or signs of HF were classified as HF with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction [HF(m)rEF]. Results: Within 6209 participants with full periodontal examination, we identified an overlap of n = 167 participants with periodontitis and HF. Participants with severe periodontitis showed a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors (men at advanced age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension) when compared with participants with none/mild periodontitis. After adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease, severe periodontitis was significantly associated with HF(m)rEF (odds ratio: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.21, 8.22; P = 0.019), although no association was found for HFpEF and HF in general. Conclusions: The current study demonstrated that severe periodontitis was significantly associated with HF(m)rEF, although no relevant associations were found with HFpEF and HF in general as well as echocardiographic variables. The results implicate a potential target group, who need special attention from cooperating physicians and dentists. Future studies are warranted to verify whether systemic inflammation could be the link between the two diseases.

Introduction: Pulsed‐field ablation (PFA) and the multielectrode radiofrequency balloon (RFB) are two novel ablation technologies to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). It is currently unknown whether these technologies differ in lesion formation and lesion extent. We compared the acute lesion extent after PVI induced by PFA and RFB by measuring low‐voltage area in high‐density maps and the release of biomolecules reflecting cardiac injury.Methods: PVI was performed with a pentaspline catheter (FARAPULSE) applying PFA or with the compliant multielectrode RFB (HELIOSTAR). Before and after PVI high‐density mapping with CARTO 3 was performed. In addition, blood samples were taken before transseptal puncture and after post‐PVI remapping and serum concentrations of high‐sensitive Troponin I were quantified by immunoassay.Results: Sixty patients undergoing PVI by PFA (n = 28, age 69 ± 12 year, 60% males, 39.3% persistent atrial fibrillation [AF]) or RFB (n = 32, age 65 ± 13 year, 53% males, 21.9% persistent AF) were evaluated. Acute PVI was achieved in all patients in both groups. Mean number of PFA pulses was 34.2 ± 4.5 and mean number RFB applications was 8.5 ± 3 per patient. Total posterior ablation area was significantly larger in PFA (20.7 ± 7.7 cm²) than in RFB (7.1 ± 2.09 cm²; p < .001). Accordingly, posterior ablation area for each PV resulted in larger lesions after PFA versus RFB (LSPV 5.2 ± 2.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², LIPV 5.5 ± 2.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.8 cm², RSPV 4.7 ± 1.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5 cm², RIPV 5.3 ± 2.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 cm,² respectively; p < .001). In a subset of 38 patients, increase of hsTropI was higher after PFA (625 ± 138 pg/mL, n = 28) versus RFB (148 ± 36 pg/mL, n = 10; p = .049) supporting the evidence of larger lesion extent by PFA.Conclusion: PFA delivers larger acute lesion areas and higher troponin release upon successful PVI than multielectrode RFB‐based PVI in this single‐center series.

Aim: The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) has been refined in several steps in recent years, reflecting evolving diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently published a modified definition of HF in the 2021 heart failure (HF) guidelines. The impact of this new diagnostic algorithm on the prevalence of HF is not known. The aim of this study was to describe the contemporary prevalence of HF in a representative, completely phenotyped sample from the general population. Methods and results: This analysis was conducted among 7074 participants (aged 45–78 years, 51.5% women) from the population-based Hamburg City Health Study. Compared with the 2016 version, HF prevalence increased with the 2021 HF guidelines from 4.31% to 4.83% (12% increase). This increase was driven by a higher number of subjects with HF with reduced/mildly-reduced ejection fraction (0.47% to 0.52%; 1.37% to 2.12%), while the number of subjects with HF with preserved ejection fraction decreased from 2.46% to 2.19%. Importantly, this did not impact the known risk factor profiles of the phenotypes. Although four drugs are recommended for all subjects with HFrEF in the new guidelines, several adjunctive therapies are recommended for dedicated cases/scenarios (e.g. <1% eligibility for ivabradine/vericiguat/devices). Conclusion: Heart failure remains common in a contemporary general population sample. The number of patients with HF will increase when the current diagnostic criteria are applied. This offers opportunities to initiate preventive therapies, especially in patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF.